OBAMA A Lame Duck

nero_bolt
Community Member

Obama is now more of a lame duck after the mid terms than he has been this year.

 

A totally inept leader thats done nothing at all for the USA

 

The American people have spoken and Obama is the loser 

 

Lets see how many of his inept policies get through both houses now......

 

 

 

10669116_814669378574448_4047724627771347592_o.jpg

Message 1 of 82
Latest reply
81 REPLIES 81

Re: OBAMA A Lame Duck

Julia,

Agreed 100%. Glad you stopped in here.
Message 61 of 82
Latest reply

Re: OBAMA A Lame Duck


@*julia*2010 wrote:

@azureline** wrote:

@*julia*2010 wrote:

yeah....aussie 14 year olds are just like any

other 14 year olds.  you won't find many interested

in politics or even know the major parties' political

leaders. 


maybe the 14 yo's I know are smarter than the ones you know?

and the reality is, even the 5 and 7 yo grandchildren in my family know who the PM is and what he does.

 


or maybe it is because i know a lot

more teenagers than you do? Smiley Wink

 

 


that is a possibility but since neither of us knows how many teenagers the other knows, no way to compare?

 

As for knowing about politics, how much do you want them to know and understand?

Many schools take children to Parliament house so they get a basic knowledge of how it works. Many families chat over dinner about the days events, sometimes that includes the political events of the day.

Message 62 of 82
Latest reply

Re: OBAMA A Lame Duck

As for knowing about politics, how much do you want them to know and understand?

 

 

i thought we were discussing teenagers (14 year olds)

having enough knowledge to understand

who would be best suited to lead the country ????

 

 

Message 63 of 82
Latest reply

Re: OBAMA A Lame Duck


@*julia*2010 wrote:

As for knowing about politics, how much do you want them to know and understand?

 

 

i thought we were discussing teenagers (14 year olds)

having enough knowledge to understand

who would be best suited to lead the country ????

 

 


that is not what I was discussing............................. maybe I missed something. 14 year olds aren't allowed to vote.

Message 64 of 82
Latest reply

Re: OBAMA A Lame Duck

goldenjet:

 

So AZ, I'm not talking about having to vote, I'm talking about who what and why. And your telling me every 18 year old is interested in politics to really understand everything about who and why their voting, and that goes for the elderly as well. I'm just having a hard time believing 18 year olds are that interested in politics.

 

azureline:

 

I can only speak about those I know, my 14 yo niece is informed about who what and why but can't vote yet.

 

 

azurline:

 

that is not what I was discussing............................. maybe I missed something. 14 year olds aren't allowed to vote.

 

 

 

 

from the above, i understood we were discussing

14 year olds understanding politics enough to be

able to make an informed decision  even though

they are too young.

 

what am i missing?

Message 65 of 82
Latest reply

Re: OBAMA A Lame Duck

The poster was asking and (skeptical) about 18 yo's knowing who what and why.

A 14 yo I know, is capable of understanding who what and why.................... but at 14 is not able to vote and probably not mature enough to make an informed decision. However, the 18 yo is.

Message 66 of 82
Latest reply

Re: OBAMA A Lame Duck


@azureline** wrote:

@goldenjet16 wrote:
So AZ, I'm not talking about having to vote, I'm talking about who what and why. And your telling me every 18 year old is interested in politics to really understand everything about who and why their voting, and that goes for the elderly as well. I'm just having a hard time believing 18 year olds are that interested in politics.

My point is just because you "have" to vote doesn't mean there's knowledge behind the vote.

I can only speak about those I know, my 14 yo niece is informed about who what and why but can't vote yet. The 18 yo knows probably more than me about the political parties.

I think to vote, you kind of need to know who what and wy to be able to fill out the forms.

 


nah....you can turn up totally clueless and still

be able to fill out the forms.

 

 

 

 

 

 

http://www.prsa.org.au/htv2010xalp.jpg

Message 67 of 82
Latest reply

Re: OBAMA A Lame Duck

 

John Roskam
Australian Financial Review 7th November, 2014

 

 

 

Abbott's big win in Washington DC

 

 

The results of the midterm elections in the United States on Tuesday are good for Australia and good for Tony Abbott.

 

The Republicans gained control of the Senate, increased their majority in the House of Representatives, and won additional governorships.

 

In the Senate there will be at least 52 Republicans to 45 Democrats, in the House 243 Republicans to 179 Democrats, and 32 governors will be Republican against 17 Democrats. Six years ago the Democrats controlled both houses of Congress and most governorships.

 

On energy, on climate change, on trade, and on foreign policy the new US Congress will take positions closer to those held by Australia. If any Democrat could be said to be a winner, it's Hillary Clinton - and even that's good for Australia.

 

Clinton's position as a centrist Democrat and as a potential presidential candidate has been strengthened against the liberal left of her party, whose policies were repudiated at the election.

 

If a Democrat were to be elected president in 2016 by any measure Clinton would be the best for Australia - she knows this country and she's not as protectionist and not as left-wing as other likely Democrat nominees.

 

There's a multitude of explanations for Tuesday's election outcome. The excuse Democrats themselves are giving is they were defending a greater number of marginal seats than Republicans. That's true but doesn't explain Republican victories in states that, at the presidential election, had solid pro-Obama majorities.

 

The one undeniable message from the midterm election is the message that nearly every election sends - it's all about the economy. At exit polls 50 per cent believe the next generation of Americans will have a lower standard of living than the current one, 70 per cent believe the economy is in bad shape, and 78 per cent are worried about the direction of the economy over the next twelve months.

 

Unemployment in the US might have fallen to less than 6 per cent, but Americans remain fearful for their jobs and fearful for the future.

 

JOBS AND ENERGY

 

During the election campaign, while the Obama administration talked more regulations on business to limit greenhouse gases, the Republicans talked about "America's energy renaissance".

 

Republicans unashamedly talked of the benefits of more energy from more coal, more gas, and more oil. The Republicans deliberately and explicitly connected the benefits of more and cheaper energy to jobs and the revival of the manufacturing industry in the US.

 

In the US, there's nothing controversial about Abbott's comment that coal is "good for humanity".

 

Republican senator James Inhofe, from Oklahoma, is likely to be the next chairman of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works.

 

He's compared the United Nations' climate change deliberations to a "Soviet-style trial" where "ideological purity trumps technical and scientific rigour".

 

The chances of the US adopting an emissions trading scheme or carbon tax any time in the foreseeable future are nil.

 

(It's often forgotten that even when the Democrats controlled both houses of Congress, Obama did not attempt to impose a ‘price on carbon'.)

 

The new Republican-controlled Congress is more likely to support the US taking a global leadership role on free trade than was a Congress dominated by Democrats beholden to labour unions.

 

If Obama were to embark on a new round of negotiations to encourage free trade (not that he shows any signs of doing so) he could still leave a significant, positive foreign policy legacy.

 

After Tuesday, while the White House will remain in control of foreign policy, there'll be in Congress a growing number of Republicans impatient with seeming reluctance of the Obama administration to deal with the threat of Islamic fundamentalism.

 

A more assertive American presence in the Middle East especially in dealing with Islamic State would be welcomed by the Abbott government.

 

Probably the only negative for Australia from Tuesday's US midterms is the impact they will have on next week's G20 meeting in Brisbane. The visit of a lame-duck American president is not that exciting and his speech on American leadership in the Asia-Pacific risks being a non-event.

 

Because of the drubbing Obama received this week, unfortunately, the G20 will now be a little less glamorous - and a little less relevant.

 

http://ipa.org.au/news/3199/abbott's-big-win-in-washington-dc

Message 68 of 82
Latest reply

Re: OBAMA A Lame Duck

You would need to be literate....................and know who you wanted to vote for

Message 69 of 82
Latest reply

Re: OBAMA A Lame Duck


@softail-joanie wrote:

but Joanie, can you elaborate as to what happened to his campaign? It's like one minute he was there, then the next he was gone...  

 

I'm not sure I understand it fully, but the talk is that the powers that be, changed the rules in how ballots were counted up. As soon as this was anounced, his supporters who put in so much of thier own efforts in Paul's favor were upset to the point where they turned their chairs away from the stand and ignored the speakers seeing the whole process as not valid and started holding their own as if Ron Paul had gotten the ligitamate nomination. At this point Ron Paul himself attacked his own supporters and steered things back to Mit Romney being the ligitamate republican nominee.

 

Ron Paul had people ready and willing to go to bat for him, to die if need be, but in the intrest of peace in the process, he threw that away.  Heres a video that goes into much more detail-

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o_WBo4sfmi4

 

.


Thankyou so much for posting that link Joanie.  Everyone who has a spare 26 minutes ought to watch it.  

Message 70 of 82
Latest reply