OHH PLEASE Gillard is crying in Parliament

[nero_bolt]

OHH PLEASE Gillard is crying in Parliament as she introduces the NDIS bill.  What a CON and total desperation from this fraud of a PM

So much for not playing the gender card as saying she is as good as the men.....  what a total CROCK from this person

Imagine if a male PM cried like she is and in particular a LNP PM... 

Bring on Sept 14 as fast as possible

[cherples]

This was only the amendment to the Medicare Levy wasn't it???? 

Where were the real tears on the day the  NDIS legislation was not only presented to the house but passed??? 

Oh.. thats right.... that was the day that we also had the apology for the forced adoptions AND the same day that Crean forced Gillard to a vote on her leadership... 

So don't go telling me that she is rightfully emotional....

How would we know if she cried that day?

The focus was on Crean.

Much of what the PM does is ignored by the press gallery who were so busy lapping up everything Crean said they wouldn't have noticed.

[silverfaun]

Using children or any other emotive subject is something Labor has never hesitated to do.

As for the insult from iza. using the disabled to insult me is another ploy. I never mentioned anything about the disabled not being worthy of help or that the NDIS is not a good idea so stop right there. I did mention her tears were for another reason, the realisation she is finished, that this was the last time she would commend to the house.

I did mention that if she cared so much why wasn't it introduced 6 years ago before ALL THE WASTE?.

She knows that no decent Australian would ever oppose help for disabled but I didn't see any of her front bench rushing up to her, extending flowers like they did for the "women's quota representation" there was hardly a labor member in the house & Plibersek was invisible too & she's the Minister for health.

Australians know a phoney when they see one, they have a built in BS meter,  she didn't fool anybody that her tears were for anybody else but  herself & the wasted opportunities she presided over.

People just want her & her cohorts gone, simple as that.

[lakeland27]

 well the alien hunting crowd are onside with abbott, i've seen them post.

another bunch of loony fringe dwellers baking tone. he ought to resurrect screaming lord sutch's raving loony party, what with bernardi and morrison and alien hunters..

[lakeland27]

backing tone

[j*oono]

The Coalition are much tougher, aren't they silverfaun.

http://www.news.com.au/national-news/nsw-act/opposition-blocks-bid-to-be-with-sick-baby/story-fndo4b...

[nero_bolt]

 well the alien hunting crowd are onside with abbott, i've seen them post.

another bunch of loony fringe dwellers baking tone. he ought to resurrect screaming lord sutch's raving loony party, what with bernardi and morrison and alien hunters..

MUST HATE MUST HATE MUST HATE

[lakeland27]

more evidence of loonies 🙂

[lakeland27]

The Coalition are much tougher, aren't they silverfaun.

http://www.news.com.au/national-news/nsw-act/opposition-blocks-bid-to-be-with-sick-baby/story-fndo4b...

great humanitarians all :^O

[lakeland27]

what about that abbott character saying "global warming is BS" in order to garner loony votes ?

Overwhelming' consensus for manmade warming: review

By environment reporter Sarah Clarke, wires

Posted 8 minutes ago

Map: QLD

A comprehensive assessment of climate change research has found an overwhelming consensus among scientists that recent warming is human-induced.

The study looked at 12,000 climate research papers from the last two decades, and identified 4,000 that stated a position on the cause of recent global warming.

Those papers, which were all published between 1991 and 2011, were written by more than 10,000 scientists.

Just over 97 per cent of the scientists agreed that man-made warming was a reality.

The assessment's lead author, John Cook from the University of Queensland, says the public perception is that the science is divided.

But he says he hopes this analysis will set the record straight.

"We wanted to measure how much climate scientists agreed on human-caused global warming through the peer-reviewed literature," he said.

"Climate scientists can have their own opinion, but they have to back it up with evidence that they can publish in peer-reviewed journals. So that's why we focussed on what scientists were saying in the public research.

"And among those papers 97 per cent of them endorsed the consensus that humans were causing global warming".  http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-05-16/overwhelming-consensus-for-manmade-warming-says-review/4693016

[lakeland27]

coalition climate advisor Chris Monkton is another fine example of 'Abbott's people'

will abbott give him a position ? head of anti-science maybe ?

he deserves some recognition from the coalition for gathering all sundry lunatrics under their banner,