on 17-02-2014 03:07 PM
on 17-02-2014 08:10 PM
i didn't know about that. a lot of stock lost up this way, and a lot of feed.
on 17-02-2014 08:21 PM
Bit off the topic--but on the topic of the past few posts.
Living ih the area is a nightmare.
LL will love this--before -blaardy Kennett sold the old SEC.
That open cut had miles of horizontial pipes on both sides.
This was well maintained and used like a home garden watering system.
(on a much larger scale).
Most was removed over the years -as the coal face got close enough to a main freeway.
(the freeway collapsed and was shut for 8 months).
So now the coal seams will burn for years--like the peat moss in pommie
land that has been burning underground for 100s of years..............Richo.
on 17-02-2014 08:43 PM
yes richo i'm no kennet fan , but it wouldn't matter anyway.. thats a shocking fire in brown coal. like you said it could burn for years. i heard some talk on the ABC radio today and over the weekend on the fire, i'd blame it on greed and slack work practices too.. an old hand from down that way said the mines used to have their own fire crews at one time as well. if it keeps going a lot of breathing equipment will be needed i'd say.
on 17-02-2014 10:14 PM
I'm not sure I fully understand what a troll is, I though they were the type of person posting horrendous comments on memorial
Facebook pages and the like. With no person in particular their target.
Then there are what I think are stalkers and they follow a particular poster (or it may be a few posters) and continually turn up where that person is posting or chatting..
One in Twenty seems a lot, but who knows?
Its funny that someone suggested it might be the younger ones because I suspect that they over 40 and more likely in their 50s.
18-02-2014 12:53 AM - edited 18-02-2014 12:54 AM
on 18-02-2014 01:39 AM
Give it ya best shot.....
I'll say you're 1 in 20.....20 of my favourite posters!
on 18-02-2014 12:01 PM
Thanks jimmy. Seems you're the only one with cahonies or at least
an opinion.
So now I know
on 18-02-2014 02:47 PM
@lakeland27 wrote:
@*pepe wrote:
I would like to know how they defined troll for that study.Most people consider trolling to be annoying, poking at people for a laugh or a response.
I highly doubt 1 in 20 online users consider themselves to be psycopathic sadists.
yes, that definition is a bit broad. some people are simply having fun and aren't trying to harm anyone intentionally.
Apparently 4000 Internet users were used in the study and asked a range of questions - none of them being - are you a sadist..or anything like that. People simply having fun and not trying to harm anyone intentionally are not considered trolls, just slightly annoying pests
on 18-02-2014 03:20 PM
Maybe it's more like 1 in 20 think they have a troll 😞
on 18-02-2014 03:45 PM
@imastawka wrote:Thanks jimmy. Seems you're the only one with cahonies or at least
an opinion.
So now I know
I know I'm not the only one who thinks so, so don't sweat it.
And you're right...the others are female, lol.