Our Environment Ministers Conflict of Interest

[donnashuggy]

http://infoaus.net/budget/expenses/pecuniary_interests_namesearch.php?name=greg+hunt&submit=Show

[just_me_karen]

Well, you can hardly blame them for calling people names. After all, there's nothing good to say about their beloved Libs...if there was, they'd be telling us.

Donna is this the environment minister who doesn't believe in science? Is he a creationist like tony?

[nero_bolt]

---

monman12 wrote:

Now DY if you  feel like researching (????) 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

That wont ever happen... why let research get in the way of another made up post  or a special by her 🙂

I guess all the greenies and labor loving lefties and moral crusaders on here had better have a word with their super companies and tell them to stop investing in mining as they dont like it... OR if they actually believed in the rubbish they write they would find a super company that doesnt invest in mining and go with them....... 

But na that wont ever happen from this lot... 

[lakeland27]

the so called environment minister definitely has a major conflict of interest there. no wonder the Young man who wrote his masters thesis on the merits of carbon trading decided his personal portfolio was more important. self-interest at its worst.

[*mrgrizz*]

---

@donnashuggy wrote:

Rio Tinto Fortesque BHP and Tiger Resources specifically

---

i see. so they are declared like they are meant to be?

what is the problem?

aren't politicians allowed to invest in shares like the rest off us, to plan for their future?

[lakeland27]

---

@*mrgrizz* wrote:

---

@donnashuggy wrote:

Rio Tinto Fortesque BHP and Tiger Resources specifically

---

i see. so they are declared like they are meant to be?

what is the problem?

aren't politicians allowed to invest in shares like the rest off us, to plan for their future?

---

of course. but greg is minister for the environment. mining and environment don't mix well, its a definite conflict as it cannot help but influence his thinking, he may profit from his own decisions .

[nero_bolt]

---

@*mrgrizz* wrote:

---

@donnashuggy wrote:

Rio Tinto Fortesque BHP and Tiger Resources specifically

---

i see. so they are declared like they are meant to be?

what is the problem?

aren't politicians allowed to invest in shares like the rest off us, to plan for their future?

---

Not in the ops views and her followers.... No  they are not allowed to......

You know hyprocisy is their moto 🙂

Its like bleating about the environment  all the time yet sell massive amounts of polluting plastic and excessive polluting packaging that goes to land fill to polute the environment ... hyprocisy  at its finest

[lakeland27 · Accepted solution]

turns personal again when andrew fails to give you something . are andrew and larry on hols ?

[donnashuggy]

He is the man that gave permission for Australias largest coal mine.

[donnashuggy]

I'm in a generous mood and felt like sharing it here John

[izabsmiling]

Prime Minister Tony Abbott has that covered I think ?

Tony Abbott winds back code of conduct to let ministers keep shares

Rules to avoid conflicts of interest allow shareholdings in public companies that were banned under Rudd and Gillard

16 Dec 2013

 http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/dec/16/tony-abbott-winds-back-code-of-conduct-to-let-ministers...