Our Environment Ministers Conflict of Interest

[donnashuggy]

http://infoaus.net/budget/expenses/pecuniary_interests_namesearch.php?name=greg+hunt&submit=Show

[monman12]

The question DY which I carefully worded  to observe if it might be understood, it was not,  was what shares does Hunt hold ? etc,etc. In view of your original link  I pose the question yet again.

And now a  somewhat dated post/link  from   2 years ago when Libs were in opposition, what topics does it now raise?

MP's spouses, as well as the MP  should not/can not  own/trade shares in opposition (?)  in opposition (poor Clive Palmer, well not poor!!!)

Should Hunt order  his bad naughty wife to cease and desist doing "men's stuff"

What shares would you allow her (him?) to hold, mineral water companies?

Now that Hunt is  in government,  what shares  DY could Hunt's  (compliant) bad naughty wife  hold?

What  should Hunt's (compliant) bad naughty wife do with Tiger Resources as a possible investment?

Finally,  if you followed the stock market DY you might have noticed that BHP, Rio, Fortescue, and Tiger have all declined since 2012 when Hunt,s bad naughty wife started "playing the market.  So it was either her fault or as a result of the ALP's policies   (between the Poor Me Gillard and Rudd Circus act)



PS
DY,  would you allow Hunt's  naughty  bad wife to own Coca-Cola Amatil shares, because CCA own Mount Franklin?.

[donnashuggy]

And now a  somewhat dated post/link  from   2 years ago when Libs were in opposition, what topics does it now raise?

The same. He's not fit, nor is he ethical.

[nero_bolt]

---

@donnashuggy wrote:

And now a  somewhat dated post/link  from   2 years ago when Libs were in opposition, what topics does it now raise?

The same. He's not fit, nor is he ethical.

---

yep... will never answer a question with a factual answer....... 

MM12 would you like to borrow my brick wall 🙂

[*ibis]

geez d-shug its a pretty simple question

[catsnknots]

ANYONE that has superannuation funds and is in politics will have a conflict of interest at those big companies are favorites of the Super 
Funds as they give good returns. 

move on.... and find a real topic. 

[lakeland27]

the Abbott govt has relaxed the rules for ministers anyway, the pecuiary register hasn't been updated since july last year so he could be in possesion of more share holdings now, you just don't know. being one of the ministers in cabinet who lobbied for the change he's almost certain to have taken advantage of it. so, there is almost certainly a conflict in his portfolio by now.

[izabsmiling]

OK.Bye ...you could start your own 'real topic' if you don't find one to your liking on CS ?

[*ibis]

yo lakeland, its a pretty simple question

but nice deflection

[lakeland27]

---

@*ibis wrote:

yo lakeland, its a pretty simple question

but nice deflection

---

he sold the shares. but since he's had ample time to buy them back from whoever held them for him and sarah. thats how it works.

[*ibis]

HHHHHHHHHHHHHYHHHHYHHHHHHH