on 18-08-2013 10:38 AM
Good Morning All.
Oh well we had a few refreshingly light-hearted threads yesterdayn now back to politics lol
"For between $US15,000 ($16,350) and $US25,000 per person - three to five times the average boat fare - they will fly them from Indonesia to Thailand or Malaysia, then to Australia on a genuine but altered passport, probably from Europe.
The smugglers say their proposal avoids the Papua New Guinea solution and the opposition's temporary resettlement plan."
Iranian Binai Abdu Samad said many people ''already came here [to Indonesia] with illegal passports … now a smuggler is saying, 'We'll prepare for you a tourist visa.'
''When you get to Australia, you cut the passport and go to immigration and say I am a refugee. They can't send you back then,'' he said. ''And you will get a lawyer with the smuggler's help.''
Another young Iranian, Ali Bahrani, agreed: ''Some of the single people from Pakistan now are just talking about this.'' He had heard a price of $US25,000 and said it was designed because ''in Australia, the rules are just for boats''.
Because the sums are so large, the money would be held in a trust with a third party and released to the smuggler only when the asylum seeker was on Australian territory.
It's all just business as usual isn't it?
on 19-08-2013 07:35 AM
@polksaladallie wrote:How does the amount of money paid translate to "class"? Wealthy people can be shot or hacked to death too.
Yes, but it appears they are not allowed to use any of that wealth the save themselves or their families.
I always thought I was working hard and accumulating wealth for my family, but it appears not. I wonder what the refugee haters would do if they were in that position? I suppose they would just form an orderly queue?
on 19-08-2013 07:41 AM
@moderatemolly wrote:
@polksaladallie wrote:How does the amount of money paid translate to "class"? Wealthy people can be shot or hacked to death too.
Yes, but it appears they are not allowed to use any of that wealth the save themselves or their families.
I always thought I was working hard and accumulating wealth for my family, but it appears not. I wonder what the refugee haters would do if they were in that position? I suppose they would just form an orderly queue?
Of course, and leave their money in the bank.
on 19-08-2013 07:52 AM
@polksaladallie wrote:Asylum seekers (and others who are illegal) have been flying in for years and years.
Asylum seeking is NOT illegal
on 19-08-2013 08:06 AM
@twinkles**stars wrote:
@polksaladallie wrote:Asylum seekers (and others who are illegal) have been flying in for years and years.
Asylum seeking is NOT illegal
Who said they were? Read it again.
on 19-08-2013 08:09 AM
hmmmm you did 🙂
Asylum seekers (and others who are illegal)
on 19-08-2013 08:12 AM
@twinkles**stars wrote:hmmmm you did 🙂
Asylum seekers (and others who are illegal)
No I didn't, read it again.
on 19-08-2013 08:15 AM
You are insinuating that they are illegal....
on 19-08-2013 08:19 AM
@twinkles**stars wrote:You are insinuating that they are illegal....
Do you understand the purpose of brackets? Do you understand why the word "and" is used? Did you read the many posts before?
19-08-2013 08:22 AM - edited 19-08-2013 08:23 AM
Sorry Allie, but the 'and others' kind of reads to me as though the asylum seekers are illegals 'as well' .
I actually thought that when I read it earlier.I know that you wouldn't mean it to read that way though
on 19-08-2013 08:23 AM
Oh please bring back the ignore feature!