on โ31-03-2013 08:27 PM
on โ01-04-2013 07:47 AM
THE WOMAN HAS WITHDRAWN HER COMPLAINT.
on โ01-04-2013 07:58 AM
THE WOMAN HAS WITHDRAWN HER COMPLAINT.
what? the complaint against an unnamed celebrity??
How can you tell it is the complaint that has been lodged against the celebrity that is mentioned in this thread.
The only complaint I see withdrawn is the one againsts the named Wilfrid De'ath
Police this week told BBC producer Wilfrid Deโath he was no longer facing charges after a woman who initially claimed he groped her withdrew her complain.
He is the only suspect where the Crown Prosecution Service has made a decision on.
on โ01-04-2013 08:19 AM
I heard on Ch 24 that the unnamed (Aust) celebrity had been released on bail and that since then the woman had withdrawn her complaint against him.
I wish people here would not link him to offences against children, the offence was against a woman.
But if I am wrong, I daresay all the details will emerge later in the year.
on โ01-04-2013 09:24 AM
It's an offence by law to publish his name, his name has been supressed. People ought to be more careful before they convict people on social media.
As psa said, the complaint against the unnamed person has been withdrawn by an ADULT woman.
on โ01-04-2013 09:31 AM
It's an offence by law to publish his name, his name has been supressed. People ought to be more careful before they convict people on social media.
As psa said, the complaint against the unnamed person has been withdrawn by an ADULT woman.
That adult women was once a child.
MSM (main stream media) has since November 2012 published his name.
on โ01-04-2013 10:11 AM
According to Kangaroo Court of Australia
What they have or haven't done is not the point at this time..it is our right to know and the failings of the main stream media and their own self-censorship. The failing of the media is a topic this site has covered numerous times and will continue to do so.
To my knowledge there is no court order here or in Britain restraining the media from naming ......
If this had happened to the average person, a priest or politician etc. they would have been named. No question about it.
Windrake, are you not against media self regulation ?
on โ01-04-2013 10:27 AM
That adult women was once a child.
"That adult woman was once a child"
Of course she was, but she wasn't when the alleged offence occurred.
The unnamed person is part of a third strand of the investigation which does NOT involve children.
.
on โ01-04-2013 10:30 AM
THE WOMAN HAS WITHDRAWN HER COMPLAINT.
Can I ask the source of this.
There is much being reported in the media...............all with slightly differing details.
Here is another version of what might have happened.
http://wordswithmeaning.org/rolf-harris-arrested-over-sexual-offence-allegations-in-operation-yewtree/#axzz2P6vn9en4
on โ01-04-2013 10:43 AM
Can I ask the source of this.
There is much being reported in the media...............all with slightly differing details.
Here is another version of what might have happened.
http://wordswithmeaning.org/rolf-harris-arrested-over-sexual-offence-allegations-in-operation-yewtree/#axzz2P6vn9en4
"Can I ask the source of this"
I have answered this ^^^^
But the link suggests he has no direct involvement. That is a bit hard to believe when he was arrested and released on bail. Although I have no knowledge of the British justice system, that sounds fairly serious to me.
on โ01-04-2013 04:12 PM
.
According to Kangaroo Court of Australia
What they have or haven't done is not the point at this time..it is our right to know and the failings of the main stream media and their own self-censorship. The failing of the media is a topic this site has covered numerous times and will continue to do so.
To my knowledge there is no court order here or in Britain restraining the media from naming ......
If this had happened to the average person, a priest or politician etc. they would have been named. No question about it.
Windrake, are you not against media self regulation ?
It is not your right to know anything & trying to tie me into the freedom of the press is sickening.
The person is not charged with any crime, his name has been suppressed because of that reason. Are you saying he should be named, his reputation trashed for life, the stain of child abuse or child sexual predator when the complaint was made by an adult who has since withdrawn the complaint.
Why are you so rabid for blood, why are you so anxious to name him & destroy a career for something that may or may not have happened. What's your motive? other than smear & innuendo.
Leave me out of your accusations, I don't want any part of them.