ROLF HARRIS

lillethbanshee
Community Member

Dear God when will this abuse stop? :_|

Message 1 of 41
Latest reply
40 REPLIES 40

ROLF HARRIS

THE WOMAN HAS WITHDRAWN HER COMPLAINT.


 


 

Message 11 of 41
Latest reply

ROLF HARRIS


THE WOMAN HAS WITHDRAWN HER COMPLAINT.


 


 



 


what?  the complaint against an unnamed celebrity??


 


 


How can you tell it is the complaint that has been lodged against the celebrity that is mentioned in this thread.


 


The only complaint I see withdrawn is the one againsts the named  Wilfrid De'ath


 


Police this week told BBC producer Wilfrid Deโ€™ath he was no longer facing charges after a woman who initially claimed he groped her withdrew her complain.


 


He is the only suspect where the Crown Prosecution Service has made a decision on.

TELL ME AND I WILL FORGET, SHOW ME AND I MAY REMEMBER,, INVOLVE ME AND I WILL UNDERSTAND Confucius 450bc
Message 12 of 41
Latest reply

ROLF HARRIS


 


what?  the complaint against an unnamed celebrity??


 


How can you tell it is the complaint that has been lodged against the celebrity that is mentioned in this thread.


 


The only complaint I see withdrawn is the one againsts the named  Wilfrid De'ath


 


Police this week told BBC producer Wilfrid Deโ€™ath he was no longer facing charges after a woman who initially claimed he groped her withdrew her complain.


 


He is the only suspect where the Crown Prosecution Service has made a decision on.



 


I heard on Ch 24 that the unnamed (Aust) celebrity had been released on bail and that since then the woman had withdrawn her complaint against him.


 


I wish people here would not link him to offences against children, the offence was against a woman.


 


But if I am wrong, I daresay all the details will emerge later in the year.


 


 


 


 


 


 


 

Message 13 of 41
Latest reply

ROLF HARRIS

windrake
Community Member

It's an offence by law to publish his name, his name has been supressed. People ought to be more careful before they convict people on social media.


 


As psa said, the complaint against the unnamed person has been withdrawn by an ADULT woman.

Message 14 of 41
Latest reply

ROLF HARRIS


It's an offence by law to publish his name, his name has been supressed. People ought to be more careful before they convict people on social media.


 


As psa said, the complaint against the unnamed person has been withdrawn by an ADULT woman.



 


That adult women was once a child.


 


MSM (main stream media) has since November 2012 published his name.


 


 

Message 15 of 41
Latest reply

ROLF HARRIS

According to Kangaroo Court of Australia


 


What they have or haven't done is not the point at this time..it is our right to know and the failings of the main stream media and their own self-censorship. The failing of the media is a topic this site has covered numerous times and will continue to do so.


 


To my knowledge there is no court order here or in Britain restraining the media from naming ......


If this had happened to the average person, a priest or politician etc. they would have been named. No question about it.


 


 



Windrake, are you not against media self regulation ?

Message 16 of 41
Latest reply

ROLF HARRIS


 


That adult women was once a child.



 


"That adult woman was once a child"


 


Of course she was, but she wasn't when the alleged offence occurred. 


 


The unnamed person is part of a third strand of the investigation which does NOT involve children.


 


 


 


 


 


 


.

Message 17 of 41
Latest reply

ROLF HARRIS


THE WOMAN HAS WITHDRAWN HER COMPLAINT.


 


 



 


Can I ask the source of this.


 


There is much being reported in the media...............all with slightly differing details.


 


Here is another version of what might have happened.


 


http://wordswithmeaning.org/rolf-harris-arrested-over-sexual-offence-allegations-in-operation-yewtree/#axzz2P6vn9en4

Message 18 of 41
Latest reply

ROLF HARRIS


 


Can I ask the source of this.


 


There is much being reported in the media...............all with slightly differing details.


 


Here is another version of what might have happened.


 


http://wordswithmeaning.org/rolf-harris-arrested-over-sexual-offence-allegations-in-operation-yewtree/#axzz2P6vn9en4



 


"Can I ask the source of this"


 


I have answered this  ^^^^


 


But the link suggests he has no direct involvement.  That is a bit hard to believe when he was arrested and released on bail.  Although I have no knowledge of the British justice system, that sounds fairly serious to me.


 


 

Message 19 of 41
Latest reply

ROLF HARRIS

windrake
Community Member


According to Kangaroo Court of Australia


 


What they have or haven't done is not the point at this time..it is our right to know and the failings of the main stream media and their own self-censorship. The failing of the media is a topic this site has covered numerous times and will continue to do so.


 


To my knowledge there is no court order here or in Britain restraining the media from naming ......


If this had happened to the average person, a priest or politician etc. they would have been named. No question about it.


 


 



Windrake, are you not against media self regulation ?


.


 


It is not your right to know anything & trying to tie me into the freedom of the press is sickening.


 


The person is not charged with any crime, his name has been suppressed because of that reason. Are you saying he should be named, his reputation trashed for life, the stain of child abuse or child sexual predator when the complaint was made by an adult who has since withdrawn the complaint.


 


Why are you so rabid for blood, why are you so anxious to name him & destroy a career for something that may or may not have happened. What's your motive? other than smear & innuendo.


 


Leave me out of your accusations, I don't want any part of them.

Message 20 of 41
Latest reply