on 08-04-2020 01:14 AM
Mitigation and response to detected coronavirus infections is thankfully proving effective , but tends to be reactionary , so what is the situation in the wild ?
Undetected infections ? self recovered ? undetected asymptotic cases ? Who can say at this time.
A random sample of residents in one area might prove interesting and validate to an improved extent current successes , also reduce any surprises.
A representative population group of say 1000 people residing in the same suburb of Sydney , but not having any coronavirus interventions therein as per the immediate area
Notification of intent to test on a relaxed Saturday afternoon , door to door knock, voluntary only , id and address confirmed, $100 thanks for co-operation per person including children , to assist with re-prioritising activities and maintain enthusiasm for the project.
Sort of like a clinical double blind test - a baseline
Any pertinent comments ?
10-04-2020 05:03 PM - edited 10-04-2020 05:06 PM
@rogespeed wrote:
@joz*garage wrote:Seems obvious, if unwanted public replies is a concern, go private.. and invite like minded people.
Even on a public forum there are standards of conduct that need not be proclaimed within a civilised community
Then take heed of your own words.
I do not like to be called a troll by the likes of you.
You have already been warned by the mod.
on 10-04-2020 05:08 PM
@imastawka wrote:
@rogespeed wrote:
@joz*garage wrote:Seems obvious, if unwanted public replies is a concern, go private.. and invite like minded people.
Even on a public forum there are standards of conduct that need not be proclaimed within a civilised community
Then take heed of your own words.
I do not like to be called a troll by the likes of you.
You have already been warned by the mod.
If one replies in a manner which has nothing to do with the post subject matter and reflects badly upon the publisher then one is a troll
on 10-04-2020 05:20 PM
If one replies in a manner which has nothing to do with the post subject matter and reflects badly upon the publisher then one is a troll
Not even a sentence.
Try again.
The heading of the thread is 'Random Sample'
And that is the subject to which people have replied.
Not the OP.
'Random Sample' could be in regard to anything.
on 10-04-2020 05:21 PM
Troll is offensive & interpersonal.
Most of us have been around far longer than you.
We don't seem to have your problem.
Que?????
on 10-04-2020 05:24 PM
Random Sample - as opposed to SPAM.
10-04-2020 05:27 PM - edited 10-04-2020 05:29 PM
@rogespeed wrote:
@joz*garage wrote:Seems obvious, if unwanted public replies is a concern, go private.. and invite like minded people.
Even on a public forum there are standards of conduct that need not be proclaimed within a civilised community
Then what's with the troll accusations? And how have you conducted yourself, baiting? which is the core of disruption.
on 10-04-2020 06:18 PM
on 10-04-2020 06:26 PM
whatever you do, dont mention the war...i did once but i think i got away with it....
on 10-04-2020 07:11 PM
on 10-04-2020 08:34 PM
Dear Rog,
I am sorry but reading your posts puts me to sleep But the answers to your posts make me smile
Regards
LIonrose.7