on 29-06-2013 11:09 AM
Dennis Muller writes about ethical lapses by journalists
disclosure: academic not political writer
I have posted the first part of the article.
An integral power of the media is that of portrayal: the act of determining how people, events, ideas and organisations are described to the public, and therefore how they are perceived by the public. In this way, the media constructs for us our understanding of the world beyond our personal knowledge and experience.
For those of us who have never met Julia Gillard, our perceptions of her are based almost entirely on what we see, hear and read of her in the media. These perceptions are then reflected in public opinion polling, and the publication of these poll results tends to reinforce the perceptions. It becomes a self-perpetuating cycle.
Eventually, in this case, the poll results got so bad that Gillard’s parliamentary colleagues replaced her as Labor leader with Kevin Rudd.
So of course it is true to say the media played a part in the demise of Gillard as prime minister. The harder question is: did the media play a part that was ethically wrong?
Some elements of the media, notably commercial radio talkback shock jocks Alan Jones, Ray Hadley and Chris Smith, clearly did. Their depictions of, and remarks about, Gillard were disgustingly offensive. Not only were they sexist, extremist and malicious, but in Jones’s case involved encouragement of the idea that the prime minister should be dumped at sea.
on 30-06-2013 03:50 AM
By the way that was no implication but straight to the point 🙂
on 30-06-2013 10:17 AM
Its called realism 🙂
If we are talking realism..
media code of ethics,accountability and law are real
on 30-06-2013 10:39 AM
If we are talking realism..
media code of ethics,accountability and law are real
Any idea why that person wants to rid the board of selected people?
Any idea why supposedly adult people wander round playing the troll?
on 30-06-2013 11:14 AM
I'm sorry Freaki..I have some thoughts on that .What I do know is that it is safer for me to be OK with it rather than the opposite .
there are some good media quotes ;
“All I know is just what I read in the papers, and that's an alibi for my ignorance.”
― Will Rogers
The media is the right arm of anarchy.”
― Dan Brown, Angels & Demons
Whoever controls the media, controls the mind”
― Jim Morrison
on 01-07-2013 08:19 AM
lets hope our media gives us what they should in future .
on 01-07-2013 11:47 PM
Our media needs to be able to operate with minimum govt interference. if what the media prints is wrong or libelous, then remedy should be pursued through the courts on a case by case basis.
This law of defamation. Didn't it used to be the case that a statement which was proven to be true was not defamatory? Was that changed? If so, that is infamous.
on 02-07-2013 12:02 AM
Above all, the media should not be cowed or otherwise intimidated by govt or otherwise prevented from making comments which are critical of govt and/or its officers.
on 02-07-2013 09:12 AM
I know this is a couple of weeks old.It mentions public concerns .
Public concern over media standards amid review
There is a ''palpable'' community concern about declining media standards and the way journalists are treating politicians, the head of the communications regulator says.
''The authority is of the view that the trend line is a very unhealthy one,'' said Chris Chapman, chairman of the Australian Communications and Media Authority. ''We need to go back and reaffirm … what is the envelope that we as a society are prepared to tolerate?''
Mr Chapman's comments come as he oversees the first holistic review of broadcasting codes since they were written 20 years ago. All the rules governing the media's behaviour are subject to change, including sections on privacy, accuracy and decency.
The debate about media standards struck a more urgent tenor last week as many expressed outrage about the treatment of Prime Minister Julia Gillard.
Advertisement
Mr Chapman declined to comment specifically on last week's controversies, which have not been referred to ACMA.
on 02-07-2013 09:17 AM
don't threads go in order of the time of last post anymore ?
is there some sort of viewing preference ?
on 02-07-2013 09:18 AM
now it's up...before that post it was below some posted on in the wee hours of the morning ? I've noticed that a few times lately ..has anyone else noticed that ?