cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Rich Blasted For C-Section "Epidemic"

THE UN’s World Health Organisation has warned that too many women in developing and wealthy countries are resorting unnecessarily to caesarean sections to give birth.

 

Other pregnant women with a real medical need for a C-section simply do not have access to the operation, the WHO added.

 

“In a lot of developing and developed countries, there is really an epidemic of caesarean sections, even when there is no medical need,” said Marleen Temmerman, director of the WHO’s reproductive health department.

 

In countries like Brazil, where some 53 per cent of births are by C-section according to WHO figures, “there is a culture of ‘let’s go for caesarean’,” Temmerman added.

 

According to the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, almost one in three babies were born via caesarean section in 2011.

Rates have risen sharply in Australia over the past two decades - from 18 percent in 1991 to 32 percent in 2011.

 

Entire Artcle Here

 

C-sections should only be considered in cases of risk to the mother and her unborn child.

I question the ethics of a Surgeon who engages in this type of surgery, simply for cosmetic reasons or to fit in with an agenda.

Message 1 of 35
Latest reply
34 REPLIES 34

Rich Blasted For C-Section "Epidemic"

vicr3000
Community Member

 

Bludy UN telling everyone what to do again.

 

Wish they would concentrate on the really important stuff - like not ignoring Ebola warning signs from Professionals

and so causing the biggest outbreak ever !!!

 

 

 

 

 

Message 2 of 35
Latest reply

Rich Blasted For C-Section "Epidemic"

What makes you think that having unnecessary c-section is not important? There is plenty of evidence that natural birth is beneficial for the baby. 

000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

Voltaire: “Those Who Can Make You Believe Absurdities, Can Make You Commit Atrocities” .
Message 3 of 35
Latest reply

Rich Blasted For C-Section "Epidemic"


I couldn't give a carp about C section or natural birth. That's up to the parents / mother to decide.

It's the fact the UN is telling people what they should do.

Next they will be telling women they can't have abortions.

Message 4 of 35
Latest reply

Rich Blasted For C-Section "Epidemic"

 

You lot go on about it's the womans choice re Abortion but quite happy to allow the UN to dictate about births.

 

 

Message 5 of 35
Latest reply

Rich Blasted For C-Section "Epidemic"


@vicr3000 wrote:

 

You lot go on about it's the womans choice re Abortion but quite happy to allow the UN to dictate about births.

 

 


No, you don't know what ":you lot" think, believe in or choose.  

 

Once again it's just 'any excuse to make a "you lot" attack will do'.  In case you failed to notice this thread is about C-Sections not the UN.

Message 6 of 35
Latest reply

Rich Blasted For C-Section "Epidemic"

LOL, Love it.

 

Hope you are having a nice day ! Smiley LOL

 

 

The UN can go to hell and stop telling everyone what to do.

 

Useless bunch they are, can't even do what they are supposed to anyway,

except infect with eradicated deseases that they are trying to save Smiley LOL

 

 

 

 

 

 

Message 7 of 35
Latest reply

Rich Blasted For C-Section "Epidemic"


@***super_nova*** wrote:

What makes you think that having unnecessary c-section is not important? There is plenty of evidence that natural birth is beneficial for the baby. 


yes, there is.

 

i don't understand why any mother

would choose to have an elective 

c-section.

 

 

Caesarean section births 'increase the risk of autism by 23%', study finds

 

http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/caesarean-section-births-inc...

 

WOMEN who experience difficult births or deliver their babies by caesarean section are more likely to have an autistic child than women who had normal births, according to the largest study of its kind ever undertaken.

 

http://www.autismtoday.com/library-back/Autism_More_Likely_in_C-sections%20.htm

 

During a vaginal delivery, muscles involved in the process are more likely to squeeze out fluid found in a newborn's lungs, Bryant said, which is a benefit because it makes babies less likely to suffer breathing problems at birth. Babies born vaginally also receive an early dose of good bacteria as they travel through their mother's birth canal, which may boost their immune systems and protect their intestinal tracts. 

 

Babies born by Caesarean section may be more likely to have breathing problems at birth and even during childhood, such as asthma. They may also be at greater risk for stillbirth. 

 

http://www.livescience.com/45681-vaginal-birth-vs-c-section.html

Message 8 of 35
Latest reply

Rich Blasted For C-Section "Epidemic"


@vicr3000 wrote:

I couldn't give a carp about C section or natural birth. That's up to the parents / mother to decide.

It's the fact the UN is telling people what they should do.

Next they will be telling women they can't have abortions.


what's wrong with that?  

 

parents need to have a good understanding

re the risks to the babies associated with c-sections.

 

 

Message 9 of 35
Latest reply

Rich Blasted For C-Section "Epidemic"

the term 'elective c section' can be a bit misleading - it is applied to any planned c section regardless of the necessity.

 

I had 2 c sections, in my notes the first was classed as emergency, the second elective despite me being unable to give birth naturally. 

Message 10 of 35
Latest reply

Type a product name