on 21-02-2014 09:24 AM
Although I participate in social media on various sites I find the online snitches to be far more virulent re reporting certain posters.
Also the 3rd party boycotts of businesses by the Greens, Crikey, Get up and unions is far more serious than first thought when they started to ruin businesses.
We are also shut down for not showing enough sympathy for people who lose their lives doing things that lead to that very fact & playing the race and redneck card is a particular favourite.
The stifling of opinions by calling to arms their adherents to remove people is a 21st century thing, more people who don't have the education to make an educated comment have access to social media.
The article below should be an eye opener to some but I'm not holding out any hope that they will pull back from this type of activity:
What sort of person posts tasteless things online and what trolling may reveal about society at large.
There is another question that has gone unasked: what type of person grasses on people for saying things they find offensive about people they don’t even know?
The online snitch is not the antidote to the online troll; he is the flipside, indeed, online snitches pursue their targets with the same unflinching obsession as online trolls.
Online snitches repost offending comments and encourage others to share, submit and express their outrage, some even campaign to make the troll ‘famous’ for being offensive.
Like the trolls, snitches express the same egotism and desire for attention and validation, only they want to be validated for their pious outrage rather than their ability to comment & push buttons.
This has a profound negative impact, not least for those people directly affected by trolling. Indeed, if online snitches actually cared about those targeted by online trolling, they should ignore such trolling. Instead, the actions of such people increase the exposure of offensive online posts.
By engaging with trolls and, in many cases, reporting them to the police, snitches turn small, often unnoticed incidents of trolling into full-blown media stories, making it much more likely that those affected by trolling will become aware of the offensive posts.
However, a more worrisome development is the impact the online snitches are having on how speech is policed online.
The online troll and the online snitch are not wholly different creatures: they come from the same swamp. The difference is that trolls don’t actually matter; their attention-seeking outbursts have no meaning outside of the online world.
Trolls
There are a whole bunch of theories about dealing with trolls. The most well-known being that you shouldn't feed the trolls.
It all boils down to this: every so often you have to dispatch a troll.
The snitch, however, has a far greater and more dangerous impact.
In their sanctioning of intervention into speech, online snitches are facilitating the erosion of freedom of speech – and cheering it all the way.
Rob Harries is a writer and researcher based in London.
on 21-02-2014 05:47 PM
@the_great_she_elephant wrote:It has been my experience that many posters here, whenever they get sanctions, convince themselves that they are being unfairly persecuted and that those with whom they have disagreements are somehow a 'protected species."
the sensible ones merely shrug their shoulders,say 'c'est la vie' and resolve in future to be a little more subtle in their comments.
Since none of us has any idea who really reported us - the button-pusher may not not always be the obvious suspect - speculating on who may or may not have it' in' for us is a bit pointless.
Well said She_El
I don't think disliking or disagreeing with someone trolling.
Unless it encroaches on your day to day life, suck it up, put your big girl/boy pants on and go face the world.
Way too much woe is me on here.
on 21-02-2014 05:47 PM
I suspect you might know the answers then.
on 21-02-2014 05:49 PM
@azureline** wrote:I suspect you might know the answers then.
Excuse me?? please extraoplate on your remark.
on 21-02-2014 05:50 PM
Hello, everyone. When you have a different opinion from each other, try to explain further in case others misunderstand you and also don't take things personally. Thanks. 🙂
on 21-02-2014 05:52 PM
@boris1gary wrote:
@love*today wrote:omg op...I'd give up, this thread has gone to the dogs
does this mean we can now post silly dog pics, i love that.
I don't think I would risk it myself ...but that's just going from my own experiences
on 21-02-2014 05:53 PM
@izabsmiling wrote:TGSE, I find those views curious sometimes.Not each and every case is the same.
Why curious, Iza? The mods don't always get it right, but I think it would be extremely arrogant to presume they play favourites, and deserved or not, is a sanction on a chat board really worth getting ones knickers in a not over?
on 21-02-2014 05:56 PM
@the_great_she_elephant wrote:
@izabsmiling wrote:TGSE, I find those views curious sometimes.Not each and every case is the same.
Why curious, Iza? The mods don't always get it right, but I think it would be extremely arrogant to presume they play favourites, and deserved or not, is a sanction on a chat board really worth getting ones knickers in a not over?
the mods act on reports .Posters may play favorites.My knickers aren't in a knot
I don't start threads about sanctions,reports,sore bottoms etc
on 21-02-2014 05:56 PM
why would I?
Thus far I have asked several questions of the op in various places and never been answered.
on 21-02-2014 05:57 PM
things seem more even now...not so during the pre-election years imo
on 21-02-2014 05:57 PM - last edited on 21-02-2014 07:01 PM by li.vish
I can't for the life of me understand why my post has gone "pooff!"
or was it a moderator? no idea.......very strange to remove a post that was positive in its meaning??