on โ20-11-2013 12:12 PM
THE average human says thousands of words a day, so a few of them are bound to be out of place.
There are lots of common words in our complicated language that have lost their meaning with time, or that have had their definitions rewritten by incorrect use over the years.
Here's a list of 10 words that you're probably not using correctly anymore.
LITERALLY
How it's often used: If I see one more person wearing those pants, I'm literally going to go blind.
Why that's wrong: Because you're not going to go blind. The word is incorrectly used to add emphasis to a sentence, when it really means to take a word in its usual or most basic sense without exaggeration.
Yes, you'll find a dictionary definition of the incorrect use, and linguists argue it's been around for a century or longer, but it's informal. And it ain't right.
ULTIMATE
How it's often used: The sundae was the ultimate chocolate indulgence.
Why that's wrong: Ultimate doesn't mean the pinnacle or the best of something, although that's how it's regularly used. It means the last on a list of things, e.g. Their ultimate goal was to win the premiership.
RANDOM
How it's often used: That girl is such a random.
Why that's wrong: Random describes something that happens without method or decision, like random violence or random samples in an experiment. It doesn't mean someone who's odd, unusual or does unexpected things.
IRREGARDLESS
How it's often used: I'll never talk to him again, irregardless of an apology.
Why that's wrong: Because irregardless isn't a word. You're thinking of "regardless".
WOULD OF/SHOULD OF/COULD OF/MUST OF
How it's often used: I would of gone to the shops that afternoon but it rained.
Why that's wrong: The correct contractions are would've/should've/could've/must've. Some people hear the apostrophe-v-e as the word "of". Not right.
IRONIC
How it's often used: It's a death row pardoned two minutes too late/And isn't it ironic?
Why that's wrong: We have Alanis Morissette to blame for many of the wrongly deployed examples of irony in the world today. Irony doesn't refer to really bad things like a black fly in your chardonnay or 10,000 spoons when all you need is a knife. Something is ironic when it is the opposite of what's expected, often in a way that causes wry amusement.
PERUSE
How it's often used: I quickly perused the aisles to see if there was anything I needed.
Why that's wrong: To peruse something means to pay close attention to it, not just to quickly scan it.
ANNIVERSARY
How it's often used: Today is our six-month anniversary.
Why that's wrong: Congrats on reaching that milestone and everything, but an anniversary is technically something that happens once a year. The Latin root "annus" means "year". Maybe the "monthversary" should become a thing?
OVER
How it's often used: There were over 100 people at the party.
Why that's wrong: "Over" should not be used when referring to a number. Use "more than" instead - e.g. There were more than 100 people at the party. The only exception is when you're talking about someone's age, e.g. He is over 40.
DECIMATE
How it's often used: The storm decimated the small village.
Why that's wrong: You'll often hear this word used on the news after a natural disaster when a cyclone decimates a fishing village or a tornado decimates a stadium. But it really means to kill one in every ten, e.g. The colonel decimated the large group of prisoners. Nowadays though, it's acceptable to use the "decimate" when any large proportion of something is killed or destroyed.
on โ20-11-2013 03:34 PM
Should of/could of/ must of....really gets me going. It's bad enough when you hear it
but when you read it in a newspaper I wonder about the education system.
on โ20-11-2013 03:53 PM
Howsabout how media and government use the following terms regularly and unabashedly to describe many people who simply have a different belief, nothing to do with religion just belief..... (look up meaning of these foll terms in a recognised, unaltered (pre-1990's Oxford dictionary)...) seem to have 'twisted' the original meanings by using them in a negative context: somehow
Dissident
Insurgent
Rebel.....there are quite a few more:)
I am not condoning 'bad' things that 'bad' people do here. Just pointing out how things are being forcibly changed and often changed 'slowly' re. The Theory Of Minimum Variation.....where the powers to be change' things' slowly and bombard the peoples with these changes as they occur - end result the peoples don't question as they don't notice these slow changes and then accept these barely unnoticeable changes, without question.
on โ20-11-2013 04:19 PM
I'm surprised at some of the words used incorrectly, such as the use of "over" as in" over 100 people".
I hate the way "uninterested" has taken over from "disinterested", the correct form.
The wrong use of the apostrophe is also a subject for a lengthy discussion! There, their, they're LOL
on โ20-11-2013 04:29 PM
And what about "I could care less"
It always used to be "I couldn't care less" which makes more sense to me
on โ20-11-2013 04:48 PM
@imastawka wrote:And what about "I could care less"
on โ20-11-2013 04:54 PM
I've caught myself saying "irregardless", even though I know it's not right, should be "irrespective".
on โ20-11-2013 05:16 PM
if things are always evolving to improve why can't language?
on โ20-11-2013 05:57 PM
I guess "improvement" is in the eyes of beholder ๐
on โ20-11-2013 06:11 PM
Just for educational purposes.
A LOT is 2 words. 'alot' is NOT a word.
Continue.