Terrorist attack in sydney

dup_fabi
Community Member

YEP! I warned over 5 years ago that this was coming also.It gets worse.All of this is in the Bible.There is a religious war coming soon.Sorry to advise but the atheists lose.

It turns nuclear.

Message 1 of 230
Latest reply
229 REPLIES 229

Re: Terrorist attack in sydney


@opmania wrote:

 

Poms never hardly do

Because its in their best interest

Not to considering they still

Get a uk pension even after

Being in Australia for 50 years


I thought that was the Greeks.

 

I understand that the Aussie pension is reduced according to how much UK pension is received.

 

Message 111 of 230
Latest reply

Re: Terrorist attack in sydney


@opmania wrote:

 

The average man in the street

Has no choice and are unfortunately

Stuck with these people who

 Would be terrorists

You on the other hand seem

To relish there presence here

And one would have to ask

Why?


An underdog to stick up for, whether they need sticking up for or not.

Message 112 of 230
Latest reply

Re: Terrorist attack in sydney

 

Yes its the same for greeks

Poms I'm sure benefit from

This arrangement financially

Otherwise they wouldnt bother

Stuffing around with centrelink

 

And if you've lived in a country

For 50 years married a man

From that country and had

5 children to him why else wouldn't

You unless you had somehing

To gain from it

When others that come here

Gain citizenship after the mandatory

Two years

Message 113 of 230
Latest reply

Re: Terrorist attack in sydney


@the_great_she_elephant wrote:

@*julia*2010 wrote:

@the_great_she_elephant wrote:

Why?


read the comment you initially

responded to.

 

 

immigrants do not need to resort

to any of that.

 

so,  which one are you? 

 


I was an immigrant and I 'resorted' to it - child endowment, medicare, free education for my kids and now a pension - I got the lot. The only thing I didn't do was take out citzenship, so perhaps that redeems me.


It actually makes you a leech.

My parents came from another country. Collected nothing from the government, ever, became citizens as soon as they could.

Message 114 of 230
Latest reply

Re: Terrorist attack in sydney

It used to be that Australia needed immigrants so that they would work and help to build and develop our country.

These immigrants were usually skilled at some trade or had other qualifications which would make them attractive to a small but growing young country.

 

These days immigrants (often in the form of refugees) are needed to swell the ranks of the unemployed, thus having the effect of placing a downward pressure on wages growth.

 

(It's "good for the Economy") Smiley Indifferent

 

I used to work in a profession which regularly advertised for people from other countries to come here to work. The industry said they couldn't find enough suitable Australians to do the job. So, instead of providing more affordable and suitable education for the Aussies here and offering them more attractive working conditions and salaries, workers from overseas are encouraged to come here instead. (this is still the case)

 

 

The net effect is that  these new workers earn many times more than what they would have earned at home. That's the good news.

 

The bad news is that these new workers from overseas will work for less (or at least, will not agitate for more), leaving Aussie workers effectively competing with them for a job and struggling to gain even the meanest improvement to their wages and working conditions.

 

My point is that there is far more than just an humanitarian reason for our govt to encourage an increase in our immigration quotas.

 

 

 

Message 115 of 230
Latest reply

Re: Terrorist attack in sydney

I for one am proud to be an

Australian citizen

I was born here and I love 

Everything that this country 

Stands for 

The standards that have been

Set for the welfare of animals

And how they have been slaughtered

It disgusts me that I have to and

Infact do not knowingly eat food

That is halal certified

That people can come into this 

Country as refugees and try to

Dictate to us how we live our lives

I would rather starve to death

And all the while pretence of 

Such innocence .

It would be so easy for the mainstream

Muslims in the community to report

Radicals to authorities

Yet they dont 

They rather their children trot off

And get killed in the glory of allah 

 

 

Message 116 of 230
Latest reply

Re: Terrorist attack in sydney


@opmania wrote:

I for one am proud to be an

Australian citizen

I was born here and I love 

Everything that this country 

Stands for 

The standards that have been

Set for the welfare of animals

And how they have been slaughtered

It disgusts me that I have to and

Infact do not knowingly eat food

That is halal certified

That people can come into this 

Country as refugees and try to

Dictate to us how we live our lives

I would rather starve to death

And all the while pretence of 

Such innocence .

It would be so easy for the mainstream

Muslims in the community to report

Radicals to authorities

Yet they dont 

They rather their children trot off

And get killed in the glory of allah 

 

 


Okay, but, personally, not that proud of you either.

Message 117 of 230
Latest reply

Re: Terrorist attack in sydney

The dilemma for some Muslims in Australia is that if they report other Muslims whom they suspect of maybe having an involvement in radical Islam, they are demonstrating a loyalty to a govt of an infidel country while at the same time, betraying members of the Umma.

 

 

This has been a problem for rulers/govts for ages.

 

To whom do the people owe their primary allegiance; to their God or to their State? . . .  and what happens when there exists a conflict of  loyalties?

 

Or, what happens where no conflict exists at all and it is accepted that loyalty to the god and the religion supercedes all other loyalty obligations?

 

Message 118 of 230
Latest reply

Re: Terrorist attack in sydney


@iapetus_rocks wrote:

The dilemma for some Muslims in Australia is that if they report other Muslims whom they suspect of maybe having an involvement in radical Islam, they are demonstrating a loyalty to a govt of an infidel country while at the same time, betraying members of the Umma.

 

 

This has been a problem for rulers/govts for ages.

 

To whom do the people owe their primary allegiance; to their God or to their State? . . .  and what happens when there exists a conflict of  loyalties?

 

Or, what happens where no conflict exists at all and it is accepted that loyalty to the god and the religion supercedes all other loyalty obligations?

 


I think you mean the loyalty goes with the dollars. Seems to be so from She-El's post

Message 119 of 230
Latest reply

Re: Terrorist attack in sydney

No, I meant just what I wrote.

 

Should loyalty to one's god (and religion) take precedence over loyalty to one's State?

 

 

Message 120 of 230
Latest reply