on 25-07-2013 03:45 PM
Some may remember the last time the opposition had to formulate 'something' to deal with problems in indigenous communities.
known as The intervention" disgraced Ashby plotter and former Howard minister Brough took charge and brought in the army.
well we all know how well that went .the net result of brough's 'intervention' amounting to a show and little more.. Now, faced with another problem that seems beyond them, that is.. managing asylum seeker arrivals.. what do this sad bunch of gits offer up as a Policy ? why, they dress it up as a military operation.. in conjunction with customs and Dept of immigration. this is pretty much as we have now so it isn't new or innovative .. its a knee -jerk panic move , more slogan than action which simply by existing and having been announced demonstrates that even the coalition have doubts about the discredited policy of Towback they have pushed for years now..
its an admission that previous policy was carp. unfortunately , so is the new policy.
on 25-07-2013 04:28 PM
on 25-07-2013 04:31 PM
Mugssy, Muggsy, Muggsy... straight to the chuckle store
25-07-2013 04:34 PM - edited 25-07-2013 04:37 PM
@mugssy65 wrote:
Not buying into the politicle crap here, my vote, my business!
BUT as a West Australan I think we do need a bigger navel presence off our shores, wonder how you guys would feel if these boats were landing on your shores? FFS one got in as far as geraldton!
During Howard's term, 11 refugee boats reached Western Australia's shores undetected.
on 25-07-2013 04:34 PM
on 25-07-2013 04:37 PM
"Now there was an orator.
"was", pity what she said did not resonate with the electorate/Caucus.
nɥºɾ
on 25-07-2013 04:39 PM
@spotweldersfriend wrote:
My navel's big enough already.
Somebody a while ago sold on Ebay a jar of whatever he found in his navel. Was it you?
on 25-07-2013 04:40 PM
on 25-07-2013 04:42 PM
25-07-2013 04:45 PM - edited 25-07-2013 04:47 PM
It was me polksaladallie. The ADF bought it and fashioned it into a gunship-HMAS Lint.
on 25-07-2013 05:16 PM
operation look more serious than the other guy there is something major missing that i noticed in Abbotts policy, its only a little thing.. a destination.that would be a thoughtful inclusion.
i hate both policies personally, but if you support the idea behind the policies there doesn't seem to be much choice..
in the days of hawke howard and keating the coastline used to be patrolled by 2 Orions.. one would fly one way and one the other .. around the australian coast. they used to wave as they passed going in opposite directions (somewhere roughly north of darwin if i remember correctly) i doubt the navy has the capacity to up the level of surveillance from where it is now without affecting other operations long-term. they could for a while, but more ships don't come cheaply or in a hurry so its hard to see it happening in any real or sustained way.