on 18-09-2014 07:34 AM
Solved! Go to Solution.
24-09-2014 11:41 AM - edited 24-09-2014 11:43 AM
Actions taken out of fear and hatred are nothing more than radical barbarism. I have no faith in the honesty of this government so Iam unsure as to what to believe in regards to "the terrorist threat".
so you can reads the words again LD
I think Blue is merely saying that a lot of fear and hatred has been created here recently, also that she has no faith in the honesty of this govt ( neither do I , they've lied about everything else so far)
there is no reference in her post that resembles your interpretation "the govt hates muslims"I cannot see those words written in her post
on 24-09-2014 11:48 AM
on 24-09-2014 03:33 PM
@bluecat*dancing wrote:
I think I see where the misunderstanding is. Lightening, I wrote two separate paragraphs. A paragraph is at least one sentence per subject, hence, two separate paragraphs. If I believed that this government hated Muslims, I would have said so in the first paragraph.
umm......ok
on 24-09-2014 03:55 PM
@debra9275 wrote:Actions taken out of fear and hatred are nothing more than radical barbarism. I have no faith in the honesty of this government so Iam unsure as to what to believe in regards to "the terrorist threat".
so you can reads the words again LD
I think Blue is merely saying that a lot of fear and hatred has been created here recently, also that she has no faith in the honesty of this govt ( neither do I , they've lied about everything else so far)
there is no reference in her post that resembles your interpretation "the govt hates muslims"I cannot see those words written in her post
Are we all reading English here?
“ACTIONS TAKEN OUT OF FEAR AND HATRED ”
I have no trouble grasping the meaning of said post but if you want to put your own interpretation on them then go for it.
on 24-09-2014 04:07 PM
You seem to be the only one to misinterpret my words.
on 24-09-2014 04:11 PM
Context is what a lot of people have problems with......... and the need to dissect and place words, that are in direct contrast to, what was actually written.
on 24-09-2014 04:17 PM
bluecat*dancing wrote:
You seem to be the only one to misinterpret my words.
I have not misinterpreted your words, they are in plain English aren't they? You believe that the raids were taken out of fear and hatred and that you do not believe the government. You accused the police, and therefore the government, of radical barbarism in regard to the "terrorist threats", you put in inverted commas, so you are underlining your statement.
I am not adding ot subtracting any of your words to suit it is simply what you wrote.
debra9275 wrote:
Actions taken out of fear and hatred are nothing more than radical barbarism. I have no faith in the honesty of this government so Iam unsure as to what to believe in regards to "the terrorist threat".
on 24-09-2014 04:41 PM
@lightningdance wrote:@bluecat*dancing wrote:
You seem to be the only one to misinterpret my words.
I have not misinterpreted your words, they are in plain English aren't they? You believe that the raids were taken out of fear and hatred and that you do not believe the government. You accused the police, and therefore the government, of radical barbarism in regard to the "terrorist threats", you put in inverted commas, so you are underlining your statement.
I am not adding ot subtracting any of your words to suit it is simply what you wrote.@debra9275 wrote:
Actions taken out of fear and hatred are nothing more than radical barbarism. I have no faith in the honesty of this government so Iam unsure as to what to believe in regards to "the terrorist threat".
Why the argument with the author about the authors meaning?
The poster has stated over and over and over what they meant and still the argument continues. Surely the author is the ONLY person who can honestly clarify a comment they have written. It seems like bullying to force meaning onto a post to then castigate the poster for that interpretation.
There is not need for it. The word muslim does not even appear in the sentence.
on 24-09-2014 04:45 PM
on 24-09-2014 05:08 PM
And why are you responding over and over when it is not directed to you.
I have a right to get clarification and If I am accused of "misinterpreting" the actual words, then I am entitled to a straight answer.