on 07-02-2014 11:19 AM
...after the criminal banks!
Citizens Electoral Council leader Craig Isherwood today called on the Abbott government to finally hold the banks accountable for their financial crimes, before it goes off on its crusade against union corruption.
Isherwood said, “In 2009 I called for an Australian Pecora Commission, modelled on the U.S. investigation of Wall Street led fearlessly by Ferdinand Pecora from 1932-34, which exposed the financial crimes that led to the Great Depression, and the corrupt dealings between the Wall Street banks and American politicians that enabled the banks to get away with their crimes.
“So far, outside of some Senate inquiries there has been no serious investigation of financial crimes in Australia. Yet after a few high-profile examples of union corruption, people in the Abbott government are pushing for a Royal Commission into the unions.
“I say investigate both,” he said, “but unless the government goes after the banks with the same zeal it has to tear into the unions, it is being corrupt itself, by covering up for corruption on a scale that crooked unionists could only dream of.”
Isherwood cited examples of the banks not being held accountable:
Isherwood noted that there have been numerous corporate collapses in recent years in which the losses were borne by the mum and dad investors but not the banks or the well-connected.
Isherwood concluded, “It is time to clean up the criminal activity in the financial system that has been allowed to flourish under the cover of deregulation.
“We must also impose the only effective regulation which can protect ordinary people from the predations of financial speculators, which is a Glass-Steagall separation of retail banking from investment banking.
“The only reason for the government to not launch a thorough investigation of criminality in the banking system, and not go with Glass-Steagall, is to cover for the bankers.
"The relationship between Macquarie Bank, aka the Millionaires’ Factory, and numerous ex-politicians and public servants who have gone to work for Macquarie after, in many cases, being involved in public policy decisions such as privatisations and public-private partnerships from which Macquarie directly profited."
on 07-02-2014 10:40 PM
on 07-02-2014 10:45 PM
@poddster wrote:Let me relate what occurred when I was hired by a company.
H had not been there a week when I was lod by the union shop steward that this was a "closed shop" and that i had to join the union. I said that no desire to do so and I was told that unless I did would be made at odds with the rest of the workers int the "closed shop" I said I would handle that if it should arrive. After arounr 3 weeks of pressure being applied to no avail the shop steward approached the company and threatened to strike unless I joined the union. I was approached by the manager who asked me to join the union just to keep the peace. I told him that i would not join and would terminate my employment before joining a union.
it so happens that over the perion of my employment the company was more than happy with my performance and did not want me to leave.
A solution was found, I was made a member of staff. 🙂 the shop steward was miffed for years to come and about half of the other union members in the "closed shop" gave up their membership when they saw that it could be done 🙂
poddster, in my experience in most workplaces "staff" as you describe it above is usually management of some sort or another and most often than not - not union members - not usually covered by same awards or EBA;s.
That is why i posted what I posted, I assume you had other jobs - like the ABC that you have mentioned before.
on 07-02-2014 10:48 PM
If they are a valued employee and the pay rise is justifiable than it is in the interest of the employer to grant it. The alternative is hiring a new employee with associated skills and then taking the risk of training and the learning curve coming in under what the increase in pay increase that was requested.
on 07-02-2014 10:48 PM
Do we have a comment about the banks at all?
Or is that too big a picture to take in?
on 07-02-2014 10:55 PM
on 07-02-2014 11:01 PM
Donna, l in my experience I have managed to make it happen every time.
In my role as an employer I had the same attitude and never had a problem.
All it needs is mutual respect and and realism in wages and conditions on.
on 07-02-2014 11:02 PM
well froth, didn't you choose the topic heading Throw The Book At Corrupt Unions...........................
on 07-02-2014 11:05 PM
@poddster wrote:Donna, l in my experience I have managed to make it happen every time.
In my role as an employer I had the same attitude and never had a problem.
All it needs is mutual respect and and realism in wages and conditions on.
poddster,
that is not how it operates for workers, usually only management - in no place i have ever worked would this have been possible for workers or acceptable to the bosses.
on 07-02-2014 11:06 PM
on 07-02-2014 11:09 PM
Could it be that the vast divide was created by totally unrealistic demands made by unions in the past?
I would venture to say that those unrealistic DEMANDS are a contributory factor in the breakdown of employer/employee relations.