on 29-11-2014 05:46 AM
BE real careful who you vote for today.
If you vote the same old way we'll get the same old result SO make sure you vote for RISE UP AUSTRALIA PARTY
I urge you to vote in protest of unAustralianism.... LETS make a stand today!
on 29-11-2014 09:08 PM
@myoclon1cjerk wrote:
@village_person wrote:
@myoclon1cjerk wrote:
..by 2050 a lot of our intake could be from Bangladesh and the Pacific islands due to rising sea levels.I thought the future was uncertain? How do you know that sea levels will rise? If we can't predict the population how can we predict sea levels?
Google is your friend.:)
Google is projecting population trends for Australia. Is Google correct or incorrect? Is Google to be believed on predicted rising sea levels but not on population predictions?
on 29-11-2014 09:09 PM
on 29-11-2014 09:14 PM
on 29-11-2014 09:29 PM
@myoclon1cjerk wrote:
Google isn't predicting sea level rises.Why do so many people here have an aversion to scientific data?
Because they've fried their brains on Krispy Kremes, bottles/cans of fizzy soft drinks and other sugary, fatty, highly-processed junk food?
on 29-11-2014 09:35 PM
@myoclon1cjerk wrote:
Google isn't predicting sea level rises.Why do so many people here have an aversion to scientific data?
NO HUMAN-CAUSED SEA LEVEL RISE SAY GERMAN SCIENTISTS
German scientists show that constant alarmist messages about dramatic and dangerously rising sea levels cannot be confirmed by raw tidal measurements. According to expert Klaus-Eckart Puls “measurements are actually showing the opposite.” Only "mysterious" government computer models show rises in sea levels, says the report.
Making the announcement on behalf of the European Institute for Climate and Energy Klaus-Eckart Puls says:
“Worldwide, neither tidal gauge data (200 years) nor satellite data (20 years) show any acceleration of sea level rise. That is in stark contrast to all past and current statements by the IPCC and several climate (research) institutes and climate-models. Moreover, there are indications that the satellite data (showing a higher [double] rate of increase) are significantly “over-corrected.”” [See ref 28 in the report]
http://www.principia-scientific.org/no-human-caused-sea-level-rise-say-german-scientists.html
I give up: why do people have an aversion to scientific data?
on 29-11-2014 09:50 PM
RUAP didn't win. Who won? Was it labor or liberal? oh.... it is labor.
You still haven't learned, yet another SAME RESULT....labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal labor liberal
WHY?
Always the same parties.
Why did youse vote like this?
on 29-11-2014 09:58 PM
The greens vote increased.
Why did RUAP fail? Becuase people don't like bigoted migrants who come here, hate on Aussies, and abuse our systems to fill their own pockets with cash..
on 29-11-2014 09:58 PM
on 29-11-2014 10:08 PM
@village_person wrote:
@myoclon1cjerk wrote:
Google isn't predicting sea level rises.Why do so many people here have an aversion to scientific data?NO HUMAN-CAUSED SEA LEVEL RISE SAY GERMAN SCIENTISTS
German scientists show that constant alarmist messages about dramatic and dangerously rising sea levels cannot be confirmed by raw tidal measurements. According to expert Klaus-Eckart Puls “measurements are actually showing the opposite.” Only "mysterious" government computer models show rises in sea levels, says the report.
Making the announcement on behalf of the European Institute for Climate and Energy Klaus-Eckart Puls says:
“Worldwide, neither tidal gauge data (200 years) nor satellite data (20 years) show any acceleration of sea level rise. That is in stark contrast to all past and current statements by the IPCC and several climate (research) institutes and climate-models. Moreover, there are indications that the satellite data (showing a higher [double] rate of increase) are significantly “over-corrected.”” [See ref 28 in the report]
http://www.principia-scientific.org/no-human-caused-sea-level-rise-say-german-scientists.html
I give up: why do people have an aversion to scientific data?
I asked you first. // Meteorologist Klaus-Eckart Puls of the European Institute for Climate and Energy; // Taking this in reverse order - The European Institute for Climate and Energy (EIKE) is a climate sceptic ginger group in partnership with the Heartland Insititute. They count among their advisors Chris Monckton, Lubos Motl, & Marcel Leroux (deceased). Klaus-Eckart Puls is listed as "Spokesman" and, from a variety of identically-worded search results, is prone to such over-specific pronouncments as the above & that "99% of Antarctica cooling" and that "Sea Level Rise Has Slowed 34%". Here's how he produced that last conclusion. [by playing with someone's elses's graph] And "Meteorologist" -- that's a weatherman, right?
on 29-11-2014 10:25 PM
@myoclon1cjerk wrote:
All looks a bit suss to me.The ALP wins AND it just so happens the results are broadcast on the ABC.Coincidence¿
Ummaaah. That is a bit suss. Maybe it is bias.