on 25-01-2015 04:38 PM
A reminder of the debt that Australia has, while Labor can bury their heads and deny it exists the fact remains we have a huge problem with debt and sooner than later the chips will fall, no business, no state and no country can keep operating in the red, eventually those we own the money to will own us. Who will own us?
The state of Qld has debt of $80 billion dollars, Labor are saying they don’t think it’s that bad, Bill Shorten on Australia’s debt, there is no debt crisis, there is a crisis and we are in this situation because of Labor, no one else and the bottom line is Labor can’t fix this problem, their speciality is creating debt not fixing debt.

Solved! Go to Solution.
on 24-02-2015 06:26 PM
Glee
I wonder if you commented when Sarah Hanson Young spoke loudly and down to in a very condescending way
to General Campbell, calling him Lt for a start and badgering him non stop.
So much so that she was censored and forced to apologise which she did through dritted teeth.
No, not a peep out of you or the left when that occurred.
24-02-2015 07:44 PM - edited 24-02-2015 07:45 PM
@vicr3000 wrote:
Glee
I wonder if you commented when Sarah Hanson Young spoke loudly and down to in a very condescending way
to General Campbell, calling him Lt for a start and badgering him non stop.
So much so that she was censored and forced to apologise which she did through dritted teeth.
No, not a peep out of you or the left when that occurred.
You don't have a clue what I make comment on. I don't care which side they are on if they are incorrectly addressing a person (and I was aware) I would comment and correct, as I have done live to my local Senator.
You seem to think we've all avid Labor supporters, which couldn't be further from the truth.
on 24-02-2015 08:17 PM
@vicr3000 wrote:
Glee
I wonder if you commented when Sarah Hanson Young spoke loudly and down to in a very condescending way
to General Campbell, calling him Lt for a start and badgering him non stop.
So much so that she was censored and forced to apologise which she did through dritted teeth.
No, not a peep out of you or the left when that occurred.
Labor appoint women because they are women, it doesn’t matter that they are incompetent, useless or out of their depth they must have a quota to fill.
Kristina Keneally was part of the team that wrecked NSW, Labor destroy, destruct and spend money like there is no tomorrow and achieve nothing.
However their worst trait is they despise anyone who is competent and can leave them for dead even with their eyes closed and hands tied behind their backs.
The moment you mention it’s because she’s a woman the Emily Listers scream blue murder, it seems misogynist is a word reserved for the Labor females, don’t throw it back at them because facts are not what Labor is about.
on 24-02-2015 08:24 PM
Labor appoint women because they are women, it doesn’t matter that they are incompetent, useless or out of their depth they must have a quota to fill.
That is a false claim.
Do you consider women to be less competent than men?
on 24-02-2015 08:29 PM
on 24-02-2015 08:31 PM
on 24-02-2015 08:57 PM
@vicr3000 wrote:
Glee
I think you misread what she meant.
No, women are not less competent.
She said they get the job even if they are the 3 things she said.
Men can be just as useless LOL
That's incorrect though. They do not get awarded the job if they are the things listed.
The quota system was introduced because competent women were not getting equal opportunity. It stands to reason if the population is 51% women and nominations are based on competency 51% of nominations would be women. Because traditionally males have dominated we ended up with incompetent men getting precedence over competent women.
Credit to the ALP for at least addressing the issue and doing something to rectify it.
on 24-02-2015 09:15 PM
I disagree.
It is still possible for an incompentent woman to get the job over a competant man, just because they are a woman
because of the quota system.
Might not happen often but it can occur.
on 24-02-2015 09:24 PM
@vicr3000 wrote:
I disagree.
It is still possible for an incompentent woman to get the job over a competant man, just because they are a woman
because of the quota system.
Might not happen often but it can occur.
What is it you disagree with?
Where did I say it was NOT possible for an incompetent woman to get the job over a competent man?
Even with a quota system there is competition so chances are the most competent women will be selected over those who are less competent.
on 24-02-2015 09:28 PM