on 25-01-2015 04:38 PM
A reminder of the debt that Australia has, while Labor can bury their heads and deny it exists the fact remains we have a huge problem with debt and sooner than later the chips will fall, no business, no state and no country can keep operating in the red, eventually those we own the money to will own us. Who will own us?
The state of Qld has debt of $80 billion dollars, Labor are saying they don’t think it’s that bad, Bill Shorten on Australia’s debt, there is no debt crisis, there is a crisis and we are in this situation because of Labor, no one else and the bottom line is Labor can’t fix this problem, their speciality is creating debt not fixing debt.
Solved! Go to Solution.
on 26-03-2015 10:03 AM
it must've been a police conspiracy
in this case though. it did happen
In late 2012, Ramjan sued over vehement remarks made by Kroger on The Bolt Report on 23 September 2012, an interview he gave to Alan Jones on 2GB, and two articles in The Australian.
By August 2013 The Australian and Kroger had settled and the newspaper published an apology for saying she had lied. Channel 10 had also apologised.
26-03-2015 10:03 AM - edited 26-03-2015 10:06 AM
You are wasting your time as the far left leaning bondi dwellers dont care as billy and labor can do no wrong and its all a lie.... in fact the hard core left leaning dont care and think everything is a lie about labor
on 26-03-2015 10:06 AM
@idlewhile wrote:The charge was spurious and no possible conviction could be ascertained therefore no conviction was recorded. Your perpetuating of this lie reflects on you and your ilk nobody else.
Please don't put words in my mouth, I simply pointed out the charge. 🙂 and Abbott confirmed it as fact.
on 26-03-2015 10:11 AM
A rape accusation he rushed out to defend himself of using he wife as a handbag shades of the gulity (Bill and Hillary)??
He is a well known woman abuser, he has a problem keeping his pants zipped (pregnant staffer) and he is an abuser of defenseless women and shop staff (see the pie rant and abuse).
These are well documented RECENT offences and yet the leftist feminists choose to ignore it. It's rank double standards and just what is expected from the leftists on here.
on 26-03-2015 10:11 AM
@donnashuggy wrote:
@idlewhile wrote:The charge was spurious and no possible conviction could be ascertained therefore no conviction was recorded. Your perpetuating of this lie reflects on you and your ilk nobody else.
Please don't put words in my mouth, I simply pointed out the charge. 🙂 and Abbott confirmed it as fact.
The fact that she represented herself while he ahd the big brass including a QC in tow didn't have an effect. Of course, the innocent students are the ones whose parents pay mega bucks to make it go away. Or do you just think it's ok to grab females by the crotch while they're delivering a speech?
on 26-03-2015 10:35 AM
@gleee58 wrote:
@donnashuggy wrote:
@idlewhile wrote:The charge was spurious and no possible conviction could be ascertained therefore no conviction was recorded. Your perpetuating of this lie reflects on you and your ilk nobody else.
Please don't put words in my mouth, I simply pointed out the charge. 🙂 and Abbott confirmed it as fact.
The fact that she represented herself while he ahd the big brass including a QC in tow didn't have an effect. Of course, the innocent students are the ones whose parents pay mega bucks to make it go away. Or do you just think it's ok to grab females by the crotch while they're delivering a speech?
A lie and spurious accusation and here you are perpetrating it again. This is what happens with the leftists on here, no regard for truth when lies will suit.
on 26-03-2015 11:44 AM
@crosbystills wrote:
@idlewhile wrote:PM Abbott..... university degree in economics, Rhodes scholar, Oxford Boxing Blue.
Tony's a bright lad (and a champion boxer / wall puncher).
Here's just one example: http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-opinion/tony-abbott-proves-hes-the-new-einstein-met...
"In the days when I was a journalist," he revealed to seekers of truth, "there were no metadata protections for journalists and if any agency, including the RSPCA or the local council, had wanted my metadata, they could have just gone and got it on authorisation. Look, I was perfectly comfortable as a journalist."
Mr Abbott was a journalist in the second half of the 1980s. He quit the craft in 1990.
The first commercially available internet web browser, Netscape Navigator, appeared in 1994. Internet Explorer appeared in 1995. And even then, a computer with access to the internet was scarcer in the Australian news industry than a sober lunch.
Mr Abbott, in short, had managed to bend time.
Don't be mean. Abbott had a lot of metadata just as Shakespeare had more than one typewriter.
26-03-2015 11:52 AM - edited 26-03-2015 11:52 AM
@idlewhile wrote:
@gleee58 wrote:
@donnashuggy wrote:
@idlewhile wrote:The charge was spurious and no possible conviction could be ascertained therefore no conviction was recorded. Your perpetuating of this lie reflects on you and your ilk nobody else.
Please don't put words in my mouth, I simply pointed out the charge. 🙂 and Abbott confirmed it as fact.
The fact that she represented herself while he ahd the big brass including a QC in tow didn't have an effect. Of course, the innocent students are the ones whose parents pay mega bucks to make it go away. Or do you just think it's ok to grab females by the crotch while they're delivering a speech?
A lie and spurious accusation and here you are perpetrating it again. This is what happens with the leftists on here, no regard for truth when lies will suit.
No, it's not a lie. He admitted to groping her from behind as she delivered her speech. He fought the charge so it didn't tarnish his record and downplayed the significance of grabbing a females crotch as harmless boy being boy antics.
on 26-03-2015 12:12 PM
Lefties are so funny. When we talk about past misdemeanours by Labor ministers we are sternly reminded that we are in the here and now.
When it's on about Liberal minister's misdemeanours, it's open slather
on 26-03-2015 12:15 PM
no I don't think that's it at all. when someone points out that shorten "allegedy' did this that and the other in the past, you should expect that everyone will also remember tony's misdemeanours. they both have have them- perhaps Tony has a few more