Tony Abbott's Support Page

A reminder of the debt that Australia has, while Labor can bury their heads and deny it exists the fact remains we have a huge problem with debt and sooner than later the chips will fall, no business, no state and no country can keep operating in the red, eventually those we own the money to will own us. Who will own us?
The state of Qld has debt of $80 billion dollars, Labor are saying they don’t think it’s that bad, Bill Shorten on Australia’s debt, there is no debt crisis, there is a crisis and we are in this situation because of Labor, no one else and the bottom line is Labor can’t fix this problem, their speciality is creating debt not fixing debt.

 
Message 1 of 1,773
Latest reply
1,772 REPLIES 1,772

Re: Tony Abbott's Support Page

Bill Sherten was described in QT as ' the David Copperfield of the Labor Party ' because he made two Prime Ministers disappear !

Woman LOL:Woman LOLWoman LOL

 

Message 1691 of 1,773
Latest reply

Re: Tony Abbott's Support Page

lol

Message 1692 of 1,773
Latest reply

Re: Tony Abbott's Support Page

And it'll be 3 at the next election 😉
Message 1693 of 1,773
Latest reply

Re: Tony Abbott's Support Page

What a beautiful gesture, such a change from the hate filled protests we see coming from the radical gays.

Message 1694 of 1,773
Latest reply

Re: Tony Abbott's Support Page

Time for the narrow minded cons to get back in the Tardis,methinks.The 1950's are thataway <------ 🙂
Message 1695 of 1,773
Latest reply

Re: Tony Abbott's Support Page

Poll: Who would you like to see as leader of the Coaltion at the next election?
Tony Abbott

14%

Malcolm Turnbull

56%

Julie Bishop

7%

Scott Morrison

4%

Joe Hockey

1%

Someone else

9%

No preference

9%

Total votes: 16943.

Poll closes in 2 days.

 

Disclaimer:

These polls are not scientific and reflect the opinion only of visitors who have chosen to participate.

 

http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/shock-jock-ray-hadley-tells-scott-morrison-pet...

 


The Libs might need to start thinking about a change with those poll results.

Joono
Message 1696 of 1,773
Latest reply

Re: Tony Abbott's Support Page


@myoclon1cjerk wrote:
Time for the narrow minded cons to get back in the Tardis,methinks.The 1950's are thataway <------ 🙂

that's sounds very intolerant of those

with different beliefs, methinks    Smiley Sad

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A bark petition signed by a delegation of indigenous Australians opposing same-sex marriage has been presented to the Coalition, calling on the government to “honour the sanctity” of traditional unions.

 

Yuminia Ken, an elder from Ernabella in the Anangu Pitjantjatjara Yankunytjatjara Lands, said she wanted “proper marriage” to be maintained. “We want husband and wife, not woman to woman or man to man.”

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Some Indigenous women from the Northern Territory have made a public appeal against moves to legalise gay marriage.

 

The Australian Christian Lobby organised a forum in Darwin on Thursday night about the Greens push to change current marriage laws.

 

At the meeting two Aboriginal women raised cultural concerns about the impact of the change.

Connie Nungarrayi Walit says allowing gay marriage conflicts with both Christian principles and Aboriginal law.

"I feel really very strong about this you know," she says.

"Because it can't be taken away from us.

"It's a law that we feel comfortable with, we fit in.

"Without it we're nothing."

 

abc 

 

 

Message 1697 of 1,773
Latest reply

Re: Tony Abbott's Support Page

Grattan said this morning that ther was "chatter" about changing leaders, but no more than that.

Message 1698 of 1,773
Latest reply

Re: Tony Abbott's Support Page

http://blackfeministranter.blogspot.com.au/2015/08/the-uluru-bark-petition-they-dont-speak.html

 

The Uluru Bark Petition - They don't speak for me

Celeste Liddle

 

extract -

 

There are several reasons I am incensed to see this petition, and I will go into them shortly. First and most importantly though, it's because the Arrernte are named as being one of the groups of which support has been derived for this petition. I am Arrernte and I say plainly and clearly that THESE PEOPLE DO NOT SPEAK FOR ME. Indeed, I strongly doubt that they speak for many, if any, of the groups they have named and the fact that they have named these groups is a rude and despicable act. They have not consulted, they have not polled and they have certainly not discussed widely. They have claimed authority on this stance while having none and I am so offended by their actions that I am calling it out. 

I have seen some "Stockholm Syndrome" stuff in my time in activism, but this really stands out. And it is news to me from an Arrernte perspective that marriage between a man and a woman is tradition and that other forms of marriage would be an affront. Last I checked, traditional marriage in Arrernte customs tended to include polygyny as well as monogamous pairings and certainly, we were not unique in this across the country. Polygyny, as opposed to the broader "polygamy" is the marriage of one man to several women. So this "tradition" that the signatories, that Brandis and that the media are crowing about - does it stretch to include actual traditions or are we conveniently overlooking some practices in order to be compliant and in accordance with the wishes of our oppressors?

 

Update:

A Facebook site calling themselves "The Marriage Alliance" posted the below photo on their page. When I responded by posting a link to this blog, I was banned from the page within three seconds. Check out the language used in it. I'd go out on a limb and say it is almost worse.

Joono
Message 1699 of 1,773
Latest reply

Re: Tony Abbott's Support Page


@j*oono wrote:

http://blackfeministranter.blogspot.com.au/2015/08/the-uluru-bark-petition-they-dont-speak.html

 

The Uluru Bark Petition - They don't speak for me

Celeste Liddle

 

extract -

 

There are several reasons I am incensed to see this petition, and I will go into them shortly. First and most importantly though, it's because the Arrernte are named as being one of the groups of which support has been derived for this petition. I am Arrernte and I say plainly and clearly that THESE PEOPLE DO NOT SPEAK FOR ME. Indeed, I strongly doubt that they speak for many, if any, of the groups they have named and the fact that they have named these groups is a rude and despicable act. They have not consulted, they have not polled and they have certainly not discussed widely. They have claimed authority on this stance while having none and I am so offended by their actions that I am calling it out. 

I have seen some "Stockholm Syndrome" stuff in my time in activism, but this really stands out. And it is news to me from an Arrernte perspective that marriage between a man and a woman is tradition and that other forms of marriage would be an affront. Last I checked, traditional marriage in Arrernte customs tended to include polygyny as well as monogamous pairings and certainly, we were not unique in this across the country. Polygyny, as opposed to the broader "polygamy" is the marriage of one man to several women. So this "tradition" that the signatories, that Brandis and that the media are crowing about - does it stretch to include actual traditions or are we conveniently overlooking some practices in order to be compliant and in accordance with the wishes of our oppressors?

 

Update:

A Facebook site calling themselves "The Marriage Alliance" posted the below photo on their page. When I responded by posting a link to this blog, I was banned from the page within three seconds. Check out the language used in it. I'd go out on a limb and say it is almost worse.


and ???????

 

 

the christian federation doesn't speak

for all christians either, so what's your point?

 

 

 

 

 

Message 1700 of 1,773
Latest reply