30-08-2013 10:19 AM - edited 30-08-2013 10:20 AM
We all seem to be ignoring the elephant in the room ( no offence intended to our resident pink pachyderm):
UN powers deadlocked as Assad vows resistance
NEW YORK (AFP) - The United States made it clear Thursday that it was ready to act alone to launch a punitive strike against Syria's chemical-armed regime, as top UN powers remained deadlocked.
Syrian strongman Bashar al-Assad vowed to resist any military intervention, and the governments of US allies Britain and France struggled to win domestic political backing for action.
Key US ally Britain had mounted an improbable bid to win UN backing for military action, but a meeting of the permanent Security Council members broke with no apparent breakthrough.
The 45-minute meeting was the second since Britain proposed a draft resolution to permit "all necessary measures" to protect Syrian civilians after a suspected chemical weapons attack last week.
US warships armed with scores of cruise missiles are converging on the eastern Mediterranean, and US military officials have said they are ready to launch a powerful barrage against regime targets in Syria.
Assad's ally Russia has blocked all attempts to toughen international sanctions against Damascus or authorize outside force to punish or unseat the regime.
Assad remained defiant in the face of the Western threats.
"Syria will defend itself in the face of any aggression," state television cited him as telling a visiting delegation of Yemeni politicians.
He vowed that any attack would result in "victory" for the Syrian people.
His regime has denied using chemical weapons and blamed "terrorist" rebels.
Click here to read whole article: http://au.news.yahoo.com/world/a/-/world/18700561/assad-vows-to-defend-syria-amid-military-buildup/
The US would have to be the most war-mongering nation since Rome!
Why don't they butt out of middle-eastern politics?
They say they have a humanitarian duty to intervene but they are just destabilising the whole region and contributing to civilian deaths.
on 01-09-2013 06:22 PM
Well, it's up to the congress now
on 22-06-2020 08:04 AM
@ashjoma wrote:apparently Assad does not allow genetically modified crops in his country to preserve the health of his people, so why use chemical weapons on them.
but then there is this
“We’re going to take out seven countries in 5 years, starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and, finishing off, Iran” —
General Wesley Clark. Retired 4-star U.S. Army general, Supreme Allied
Commander of NATO during the 1999 War on Yugoslavia .
Yeah how about that! Yes we here in a democracy don't have that right to say if our crops should be
tampered with or not. I believe Russia is the same. Putin has gotten rid or stoppped at lot of GM tampering in Russia.
And to the second part, all I can say is that these people are beyond insane. The PNAC group aka The Neo-Con Crazies were fanatics.
on 22-06-2020 09:00 AM
How bored is that - LOL.
A 7 year old thread.
on 22-06-2020 10:49 AM
on 23-06-2020 12:42 AM
I noticed not much air time now - and someone muffed north-west Syria , with another player running around there now
on 23-06-2020 01:57 AM
@rogespeed wrote:I noticed not much air time now - and someone muffed north-west Syria , with another player running around there now
How can we even begin to adress what has gone wrong there? What was a productive country is now wrecked. Greed is one of the big factors. Lybia was wrecked too.
on 23-06-2020 02:00 AM
@icyfroth wrote:
@poddsterwrote:It seems like just another war that the US has to have to keep its economy buoyant and clear the streets of thugs by turning them into cannon fodder in another country.
Anyone ever wondered if perhaps the US may have had a hand in the use of chemical weapons as part of a false flag covert op?
There's talk that the US is supporting the rebels by supplying arms and ammunition. Assad says that the rebels staged the attack in order to frame the government.
Well, that wouldn't be the first time it has happened.