on โ16-10-2013 09:11 PM
can someone explain it to me in simple terms. I'm really dense when it comes to global economy.
on โ16-10-2013 10:40 PM
You will have to ask the ex super treas, Swannie, he could tell you a good yarn ๐
on โ16-10-2013 10:46 PM
other nations call on the US to intervene because that's what the US has trained them to do.
The US put themselves into that position, they wanted to be the global leaders that all other countries depended on.
on โ16-10-2013 10:49 PM
on โ16-10-2013 10:50 PM
on โ16-10-2013 10:51 PM
@poddster wrote:You will have to ask the ex super treas, Swannie, he could tell you a good yarn ๐
but posters on here were recently trying to convince me that debt was good for Australia.
If this is an example of the ramifications of debt, then what is so good about it?
I don't understand why, when we are already in so much debt that instead of tightening our belts for a while and stopping the spending and introduction of new schemes and policies until we can pay for them.
on โ16-10-2013 10:51 PM
I dont know on many nation who would ask for American intervention. Most nations would fight that eventuality tooth and nail, but tooth and nail are not vert effective against high tech mechanised weapons and warfare.
โ16-10-2013 10:52 PM - edited โ16-10-2013 10:54 PM
Crikey you don't expect any country to have no debt do you (or very little debt)?
If the Govt spends money on infrastructure that can stimulate the economy.. more employment, more building materials etc bought.. how can they pay for that if not by borrowing?
As this thread is about US debt ceiling.. I guess we should actually stick with discussing the US economy.
on โ16-10-2013 10:54 PM
Around the 17 trillion figure doesn't sound much like a ceiling. Sounds more to me like nudging the stratosphere.
on โ16-10-2013 10:55 PM
on โ16-10-2013 11:06 PM
@kopenhagen5 wrote:Or crikey, is it because the rest of the world (parts thereof) have put the USA in that position?
I don't think so.