on 26-10-2015 07:35 PM
Congratulations to the Anangu people, who had Uluru handed back to them thirty years ago, today. A day worth celebrating.
Solved! Go to Solution.
on 27-10-2015 09:58 AM
@bluecat*slowdancing wrote:Congratulations to the Anangu people, who had Uluru handed back to them thirty years ago, today. A day worth celebrating.
ABSOLUTELY.
I still havent been there yet, but i am looking forward to seeing it in all its wonderful glory.
on 26-10-2015 07:52 PM
and boy they know how to charge ( rip off ) the tourists up there as well
on 26-10-2015 08:07 PM
Yeah I worked there in the 70s
They were practicing even
Then
Old Capt no 7
I think they called him that
Because he had 7 women
If anyone took their picture
With a camera they wanted
20c
If you had a video camera
On the other hand they asked
For $1.00
They no silly
on 27-10-2015 12:24 AM
Their land.
27-10-2015 06:22 AM - edited 27-10-2015 06:23 AM
@bluecat*slowdancing wrote:Their land.
You know there may be some full bloods up there but in NSW ,VIC and Qld the vast majority are not.In fact there are many that are as white as white bread that claim to be "black".I have seen a woman with blonde hair blue eyes snow white skin state "that as a black woman ....."
Many say "if the whites never came here we would be better off ........."
If white s didnt come here they would not exist.Simple logic tells that.
It may be that if no one from outside came that someone would exist but not one of those of mixed blood would exist.Not one.So that argument has no legs at all.
on 27-10-2015 09:42 AM
The housing trust waiting time for the general
Population in Adelaide is 23 years.
Refugees are placed immediately as soon as a house
Unoccupied
Abirigimals have been known on several occasions
To have burned down their houses twice or even
Thrice and are given a replacement
And I went with a builder to a new building site
For aboriginal housing in Alice Spings
Beautiful new houses he said before long they
Move in the first thing they do is tear down
The doors and every piece of wood in the house
And have some lovely big bonfires
on 27-10-2015 09:58 AM
@bluecat*slowdancing wrote:Congratulations to the Anangu people, who had Uluru handed back to them thirty years ago, today. A day worth celebrating.
ABSOLUTELY.
I still havent been there yet, but i am looking forward to seeing it in all its wonderful glory.
on 27-10-2015 12:34 PM
Many say "if the whites never came here we would be better off ........."
If white s didnt come here they would not exist.Simple logic tells that.
It may be that if no one from outside came that someone would exist but not one of those of mixed blood would exist.Not one.So that argument has no legs at all.
That would have to be one of the fuzziest piece of logic I have ever seen on these boards. Of course the 'mixed blood' individuals at Uluru wouldn't be here today if the whites hadn't come - chances are none of todays 'full bloods' inividuals would exist either. The group dynamics - and therefore the population - would have developed completely differently.
If one of Mr Elephant's ancestors hadn't stolen 48 bottles from the back of a pub in 1791, or if I hadn't got bored with my life in London and decided to become a 10 quid tourist in 1962, none of my children, grandchildren or great grandchildren would be here today. Every single individual living on this planet is only here because of an eons long sequence of random events so coincidental as to be almost beyond the bounds of probability.
on 27-10-2015 12:39 PM
Of course the 'mixed blood' individuals at Uluru wouldn't be here today if the whites hadn't come - chances are none of todays 'full bloods' inividuals would exist either.
so why would they be "better off"?
on 27-10-2015 01:04 PM
@*julia*2010 wrote:Of course the 'mixed blood' individuals at Uluru wouldn't be here today if the whites hadn't come - chances are none of todays 'full bloods' inividuals would exist either.
so why would they be "better off"?
The words used were 'we'd be better off' not "I'd be better off" - which implies the alleged speaker was talking about the present day Aboriginal population of Uluru, not any particular Iindividual. Therefore the argument about whether alleged speaker would or would not be here today is irrelevant.
(And I use the word alleged because I suspect the poster in question is relying on hearsay and has never actually had that comment made to them by any individual)