Unhinged Vitriolic Speech

silverfaun
Community Member

This disgusting swan song from a Green was lauded on here as a milestone and a rival to Gillards misplaced misogyny rant.

 

The people who support this type of hate speech are not indicitive of the wider Australian people and to applaud this type of hate  is appalling.

 

I will stand up to this type of thing and so will the majority of Australians. This person is not fit to be in parliament and he should be rejected wholeheartedly by everyone, which he will be come the WA re election, and good riddance to him and his ilk:

 

 

SPORTING dark suit and speaking in a calm, measured tone, Scott Ludlam is the acceptable face of the Greens.

 

He has spoken out previously against the “people’s revolt” against the carbon tax that sparked the “Ditch the Witch” nastiness.

 

Ludlam’s style is the antithesis of histrionics such as the current appalling rock concert concoctions of a fake prime ministerial beheading.

 

This week the West Australian senator rose to a near-empty chamber and delivered a prepared speech without raising his voice and with no one around to interject. Later, the 7 1/2-minute speech went viral on YouTube, a hit with the young Green Left crowd, attracting 400,000 hits within a few days.

 

But forget the style of the speech; it merely disguised a message that was divisive, vindictive and in the end subversive.

 

“We want our country back,” he said, just six months after a federal election. This is a senator who, with his colleagues, holds the balance of power in the Senate on about 10 per cent of the vote.

 

Yet he told supporters they were somehow disenfranchised.

 

Ludlam spoke of “predator capitalism” and a “murderous horror unfolding on Manus Island” as he launched an attack on the Prime Minister and his government. He suggested Abbott treated WA as a “caricatured redneck backwater” and that it was “kind of revolting” that the Prime Minister consulted with “mining billionaires and media oligarchs on the other side of the world”.

 

Ludlam provided no serious evidence or justification for his slurs. He even talked about Abbott - who I first met 20 years ago through a mutual gay friend and who has been publicly loving and supportive of his gay sister - as “waving (his) homophobia in people’s faces”.

 

We know the Greens are a party of protest but this invective was simply hateful.

 

“Prime Minister,” said Ludlam, “you are welcome to take your heartless and racist exploitation of people’s fears and ram it as far from Western Australia as your taxpayer-funded travel entitlements can take you.”

 

So Ludlam used the Senate to denigrate a freshly elected Prime Minister who is implementing his agenda - to the extent that he isn't blocked by Ludlam’s party - as racist, cynically manipulative, heartless and exploitative.

On what evidence?

 

This vitriol is subversive because it suggests a democratic government has somehow stolen the country. If Ludlam and his supporters want their “country back” surely the way to do it is through fair-minded criticism and a viable alternative.

 

Message 1 of 265
Latest reply
264 REPLIES 264

Re: Unhinged Vitriolic Speech

No it's isn't if he stood in parliament and cast racist homophobic slurs on the PM of this country.

He stood up in parliament and cast these putrid slurs, he didn't dare say any of this outside of Parliamentary privilege.

 

It was a racist insulting speech and instead of looking at what he said people should look at what he stands for.

 

 

Message 91 of 265
Latest reply

Re: Unhinged Vitriolic Speech


@silverfaun wrote:

@izabsmiling wrote:

Silverfaun, I take great care now to make sure I write your full id and spell it correct ...not as your avitar suggests.I have learnt that if i do otherwise it will be corrected and quickly .I'm sorry that upsets you  as you expressed when I get it wrong ..please feel free to refer to me as Iza if you wish ...I don't see doing that (shortening my id or even getting that wrong like say isa as unfriendly) as a problem for mod attention.If I got such an error edited and made a fuss ..that imo would be unfriendly and would make others cautious .


This new restriction is not anything I reported but has seen many left  posters getting people either edited or s....  if they have shortened their name.

 

I could name them  but that  would not result in a good outcome for me.

 

This has been happening lately because some want to distort an id for insult. I made a typo on an ID and even though I pointed out it was a typo I was ......

 

Now whether this is a new way of getting posters banned or something the powers that be have been instructed to do then we will never know.

 

For the many years I have been on here I have never been pulled up by another poster for shortening their ID.

 

So I would not refer to you with the dimunitive you so kindly offered,   others could take it as an excuse and let's face it some don't need much of an excuse.

 

 

 

______________________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

it was the reaction after the event which gave it away 

If you can actually name posters this is serious .The mods can not rightly give such info away...just reading what you have claimed is not right ... it sounds threatening and intimidating 

 

 

Message 92 of 265
Latest reply

Re: Unhinged Vitriolic Speech

total bs and belongs with all the nasty gossip and lies published about our former Government.

Message 93 of 265
Latest reply

Re: Unhinged Vitriolic Speech


@polksaladallie wrote:

Apt title.


I wish that I could give you an extra kudo 

Message 94 of 265
Latest reply

Re: Unhinged Vitriolic Speech

So this puts paid to any sensible debate with you. Intimidating and threatening??? what on earth is that about.? it was nothing of the sort wheras your reply is.

Message 95 of 265
Latest reply

Re: Unhinged Vitriolic Speech

I also NEVER  said the mods gave any info away. sheesh!

Message 96 of 265
Latest reply

Re: Unhinged Vitriolic Speech

i hope that this doesn't put paid to all sensible discussion 

 

Message 97 of 265
Latest reply

Re: Unhinged Vitriolic Speech


@silverfaun wrote:

No it's isn't if he stood in parliament and cast racist homophobic slurs on the PM of this country.

He stood up in parliament and cast these putrid slurs, he didn't dare say any of this outside of Parliamentary privilege.

 

It was a racist insulting speech and instead of looking at what he said people should look at what he stands for.

 

 


Why don't you watch it before passing such judgements?

Message 98 of 265
Latest reply

Re: Unhinged Vitriolic Speech


@silverfaun wrote:

No it's isn't if he stood in parliament and cast racist homophobic slurs on the PM of this country.

He stood up in parliament and cast these putrid slurs, he didn't dare say any of this outside of Parliamentary privilege.

 

It was a racist insulting speech and instead of looking at what he said people should look at what he stands for.

 

 


It wasn't a vitriolic speech silver, it was very honest and matter of fact

 

are you sure we're talking aboiut the same speech here??

Message 99 of 265
Latest reply

Re: Unhinged Vitriolic Speech

I just watched it to see what all the hullabaloo was about.

 

It was racist and homophobic and vitriol. Strangely delivered in rather an unenthusiastic and dispassionate manner by a rather anaemic looking man groomed to perfection, reading his speech off as if he'd seen it for the first time. Also he appeared to be speaking to no-one in particular.

It actually read better in Faun's OP than it was spoken, when I finally saw it on Bolt this morning, lol.

 

It did however have a kernel of truth in it, as Cassandra Wilkinson said on Bolt this morning, people of Australia do want to know why they're being priced out of affordable housing and losing their jobs to overseas manufacturing.

 

 

Message 100 of 265
Latest reply