Unhinged Vitriolic Speech

silverfaun
Community Member

This disgusting swan song from a Green was lauded on here as a milestone and a rival to Gillards misplaced misogyny rant.

 

The people who support this type of hate speech are not indicitive of the wider Australian people and to applaud this type of hate  is appalling.

 

I will stand up to this type of thing and so will the majority of Australians. This person is not fit to be in parliament and he should be rejected wholeheartedly by everyone, which he will be come the WA re election, and good riddance to him and his ilk:

 

 

SPORTING dark suit and speaking in a calm, measured tone, Scott Ludlam is the acceptable face of the Greens.

 

He has spoken out previously against the “people’s revolt” against the carbon tax that sparked the “Ditch the Witch” nastiness.

 

Ludlam’s style is the antithesis of histrionics such as the current appalling rock concert concoctions of a fake prime ministerial beheading.

 

This week the West Australian senator rose to a near-empty chamber and delivered a prepared speech without raising his voice and with no one around to interject. Later, the 7 1/2-minute speech went viral on YouTube, a hit with the young Green Left crowd, attracting 400,000 hits within a few days.

 

But forget the style of the speech; it merely disguised a message that was divisive, vindictive and in the end subversive.

 

“We want our country back,” he said, just six months after a federal election. This is a senator who, with his colleagues, holds the balance of power in the Senate on about 10 per cent of the vote.

 

Yet he told supporters they were somehow disenfranchised.

 

Ludlam spoke of “predator capitalism” and a “murderous horror unfolding on Manus Island” as he launched an attack on the Prime Minister and his government. He suggested Abbott treated WA as a “caricatured redneck backwater” and that it was “kind of revolting” that the Prime Minister consulted with “mining billionaires and media oligarchs on the other side of the world”.

 

Ludlam provided no serious evidence or justification for his slurs. He even talked about Abbott - who I first met 20 years ago through a mutual gay friend and who has been publicly loving and supportive of his gay sister - as “waving (his) homophobia in people’s faces”.

 

We know the Greens are a party of protest but this invective was simply hateful.

 

“Prime Minister,” said Ludlam, “you are welcome to take your heartless and racist exploitation of people’s fears and ram it as far from Western Australia as your taxpayer-funded travel entitlements can take you.”

 

So Ludlam used the Senate to denigrate a freshly elected Prime Minister who is implementing his agenda - to the extent that he isn't blocked by Ludlam’s party - as racist, cynically manipulative, heartless and exploitative.

On what evidence?

 

This vitriol is subversive because it suggests a democratic government has somehow stolen the country. If Ludlam and his supporters want their “country back” surely the way to do it is through fair-minded criticism and a viable alternative.

 

Message 1 of 265
Latest reply
264 REPLIES 264

Re: Unhinged Vitriolic Speech

Look what I can do  Woman LOL

Message 211 of 265
Latest reply

Re: Unhinged Vitriolic Speech

the targets of their exploitation can and will speak ....more so as we ended up with a dudd product from the bs campaign 

Message 212 of 265
Latest reply

Re: Unhinged Vitriolic Speech

If voters want to vote for TA because he takes his daughters out with him when campaigning, why shouldnt they? Not something I would be influenced by.

Message 213 of 265
Latest reply

Re: Unhinged Vitriolic Speech

If Australians want to discuss this or anything else why does anyone feel that they have the right to try to stop them ?

 

Message 214 of 265
Latest reply

Re: Unhinged Vitriolic Speech

It's amazing, Iza. Well done 😄

.
Message 215 of 265
Latest reply

Re: Unhinged Vitriolic Speech


@am*3 wrote:
I though you were worried about voters..not many in France eligible to vote in Aust elections.

We could publish some not nice things about the French president and his mistress... but that wouldn't achieve anything either. The French don't care about their Presidents affairs.

Is there some father/daughter angst here that runs deeper than election campaigns?

not relevant at all ...though lets just say that I have had a bit of experience with men and women with NPD 

everyone else is just something to be used for their own enjoyment 

 

Message 216 of 265
Latest reply

Re: Unhinged Vitriolic Speech


@icyfroth wrote:

wow Iza, I think you've managed to give unhinged vitriolic speech a whole new meaning

Lol obviously  you went to the school of witty quick repartee thats a 10 Smiley Happy

 

Message 217 of 265
Latest reply

Re: Unhinged Vitriolic Speech

Margie Abbotts speech

....but before all of that, there’s an election. Elections these days are different for our family than they were a few years ago. For most of the girls’ lives, Tony and I made a conscious decision to keep them away from politics and political campaigns. As they were growing up, they never appeared in a brochure and we kept them very much away from any of the campaigning at election time.

But the last election was different, the girls had grown up and they wanted to support their father.

So we all got involved, rolled up our sleeves. It was a real family effort and we want to do it again this time – we want to do so because we know that Tony is a good man, with a great heart – and we want all Australians to know that. As he has helped to shape my life and the lives of his daughters so to have we helped to shape his over the past 20 odd years. I am sure you can see this indeed within your own families.
Message 218 of 265
Latest reply

Re: Unhinged Vitriolic Speech

thats so sweet and folksy, peta credlin i reckon.

Message 219 of 265
Latest reply

Re: Unhinged Vitriolic Speech

whether the girls were exploited or not is in my opinion irrelevant - his comments about voting for him, he is the one with the good looking daughters, was inappropriate for any father to make, cringe worthy coming from the future leader of our country and just a tad creepy.

Message 220 of 265
Latest reply