Victim not allowed to know where paroled attacker lives to protect his privacy :(

http://www.news.com.au/national-news/victoria/victim-not-allowed-to-know-where-paroled-attacker-live...

 

inShare
 
Domestic vioence victim

Domestic vioence victim Jeannie Blackburn is lobbying the government to release information regarding the whereabouts of violent criminals who have been released on parole.

A VICTIM of terrifying domestic violence has been told she is not allowed to know the area where her paroled attacker is living because of HIS right to privacy.

Jeannie Blackburn suffered 18-months of unprovoked violent abuse at the hands of Paul Francis McCuskey, culminating in her losing sight in one eye after he dragged her from her bed and stomped on her head.

Medical experts said her injuries were similar to that of a high impact car crash.

McCuskey was released from prison in April - with two and a half years to serve on parole - but pleas to the Adult Parole Board and Victims of Crime Register to know the area where he is living have been denied.

In a bizarre twist, McCuskey has been informed of where Ms Blackburn lives, as he is not allowed to go near her address.

"I don't want to know what street or even what suburb he is in, but just a general area to avoid for my own protection." Ms Blackburn said.

"I am being made to feel like a prisoner in my own home while he is free to walk the streets as he pleases.

"Why does he have more rights than I do, when I have done nothing wrong?"

domestic violence

Paul Francis McCuskey who is on parole for domestic violence against his ex-partner Jeannine Blackburn, who is fighting to know where her attacker is now living.

The woman beater also caused Ms Blackburn to miscarry after kicking her in the stomach in another sickening attack.

McCuskey, who received a bravery award for being one of several CFA volunteers who rescued an elderly woman at Cambarville during the 2009 Black Saturday bush fires, later had the honour stripped after intervention from the Governor General of Australia, Quentin Bryce.

He was sentenced to five years and six months in prison, with a minimum of three years, in April 2010.

Ms Blackburn said she contacted the Adult Parole Board to find out the general area of where he was living after his release on April 27 this year.

She claims she was told they could not tell her due to his right to privacy. The allegation is denied by the Adult Parole Board.

Ms Blackburn said she then contacted the Victims of Crime Register and wrote a letter requesting the information early last month without reply.

Domestic vioence victim

Domestic vioence victim Jeannie Blackburn is lobbying the government to release information regarding the whereabouts of violent criminals who have been released on parole.

Its website states: "Inclusion on the Register does not entitle you to information about… Where the prisoner / offender lives or intends

to live upon release from prison."

Ms Blackburn now intends to lobby the State Government to change the law.

"He lost his privacy rights when he pleaded guilty to intentionally, recklessly and seriously injuring me, at least while on parole" she said.

"Laws should be in place to protect the innocent, not the guilty."

A spokesman for the Adult Parole Board said McCuskey is subject to a "strict supervision regime."

"If Mr McCuskey fails to comply with any condition of his order, he will be immediately reported to the Board," he said.

jon.kaila@news.com.au


Read more: http://www.heraldsun.com.au/national-news/victoria/victim-not-allowed-to-know-where-paroled-attacker...

Message 1 of 99
Latest reply
98 REPLIES 98

Re: Victim not allowed to know where paroled attacker lives to protect his privacy :(

At least with him knowing where she is and her not knowing where he is, only one person, the original victim, can be destroyed. Wonderful justice system we have. 

Message 31 of 99
Latest reply

Re: Victim not allowed to know where paroled attacker lives to protect his privacy :(


@*elizabeths-mum* wrote:

@crikey*mate wrote:

 


Cherry Picking, eh?

 

When is parole cancelled?




 

when another crime is committed


 As yet, this offender has not committed another crime (that we are aware of) He is serving his sentence for the crime he has been found guilty of, and clearly the law (as inefficient or ineffective as we may believe it to be) has said that he has served the appropriate amount of his time incarcerated and now is to serve out the remainder on parole inclusive of it's restrictions, in the general community.


Some people can go their whole lives and never really live for a single minute.
Message 32 of 99
Latest reply

Re: Victim not allowed to know where paroled attacker lives to protect his privacy :(

I'm sorry, was the question about when is parole cancelled specifically about this person? it sounded like a general inquiry (or challenge)

 

 

Message 33 of 99
Latest reply

Re: Victim not allowed to know where paroled attacker lives to protect his privacy :(


@*elizabeths-mum* wrote:

At least with him knowing where she is and her not knowing where he is, only one person, the original victim, can be destroyed. Wonderful justice system we have. 


It seems to be the way it works, they wouldnt want to empower a victim

Message 34 of 99
Latest reply

Re: Victim not allowed to know where paroled attacker lives to protect his privacy :(


@*elizabeths-mum* wrote:

At least with him knowing where she is and her not knowing where he is, only one person, the original victim, can be destroyed. Wonderful justice system we have. 


EM, I understand that too.

 

Hypothetical - I am not saying that this woman or any of her associates would behave in this manner.

 

Lets say a victim of crime or one of their associates is so distraught that they decide to administer their own justice. Then what happens? What happens when they kill or maim the offender? What happens when they inturn break the law themselves? Then , where does that stop? How many chain reaction crimes does it take before everyone receives the justice to which they believe they are entitled?

 

The law cannot punish for crimes that have not yet been committed, but it can try to prevent them for the protection of everyone.

 

Have you seen the movie Minority Report?

 

 


Some people can go their whole lives and never really live for a single minute.
Message 35 of 99
Latest reply

Re: Victim not allowed to know where paroled attacker lives to protect his privacy :(


@crikey*mate wrote:

@*elizabeths-mum* wrote:

At least with him knowing where she is and her not knowing where he is, only one person, the original victim, can be destroyed. Wonderful justice system we have. 


EM, I understand that too.

 

Hypothetical - I am not saying that this woman or any of her associates would behave in this manner.

 

Lets say a victim of crime or one of their associates is so distraught that they decide to administer their own justice. Then what happens? What happens when they kill or maim the offender? What happens when they inturn break the law themselves? Then , where does that stop? How many chain reaction crimes does it take before everyone receives the justice to which they believe they are entitled?

 

The law cannot punish for crimes that have not yet been committed, but it can try to prevent them for the protection of everyone.

 

Have you seen the movie Minority Report?

 

 


Thats great in theory but in practice its BS, what happens when the guilty person wants revenge for being put in jail and is then given information including the address for his intended victim? 

 

Its a great system, not

 

 

Message 36 of 99
Latest reply

Re: Victim not allowed to know where paroled attacker lives to protect his privacy :(


@the_hawk* wrote:

@*elizabeths-mum* wrote:

At least with him knowing where she is and her not knowing where he is, only one person, the original victim, can be destroyed. Wonderful justice system we have. 


It seems to be the way it works, they wouldnt want to empower a victim


Sounds like a dumb ass system to me.

He should not know her address nor she his.

 

Message 37 of 99
Latest reply

Re: Victim not allowed to know where paroled attacker lives to protect his privacy :(

**meep**
Community Member

Well, she has put his identity 'out there' so maybe she i counting on being alerted by someone who recognises him, if that will make her feel 'safer'.

Message 38 of 99
Latest reply

Re: Victim not allowed to know where paroled attacker lives to protect his privacy :(


@the_hawk* wrote:

@crikey*mate wrote:

@*elizabeths-mum* wrote:

At least with him knowing where she is and her not knowing where he is, only one person, the original victim, can be destroyed. Wonderful justice system we have. 


EM, I understand that too.

 

Hypothetical - I am not saying that this woman or any of her associates would behave in this manner.

 

Lets say a victim of crime or one of their associates is so distraught that they decide to administer their own justice. Then what happens? What happens when they kill or maim the offender? What happens when they inturn break the law themselves? Then , where does that stop? How many chain reaction crimes does it take before everyone receives the justice to which they believe they are entitled?

 

The law cannot punish for crimes that have not yet been committed, but it can try to prevent them for the protection of everyone.

 

Have you seen the movie Minority Report?

 

 


Thats great in theory but in practice its BS, what happens when the guilty person wants revenge for being put in jail and is then given information including the address for his intended victim? 

 

Its a great system, not

 

 


You're shooting the messenger here - I don't make the laws!

 

Should the offender or the victim break the law, then they will be punished *cough*accordingly*cough*

 

I study the law because I wanted to know why it works the way that it does. It doesn't mean that I agree with it.


Some people can go their whole lives and never really live for a single minute.
Message 39 of 99
Latest reply

Re: Victim not allowed to know where paroled attacker lives to protect his privacy :(


@i-need-a-martini wrote:

@mtnlane wrote:

Your assumption that she wants his address to act as some sort of vigilante has no basis in fact.

 

Unless you have been in that woman's situation or something similar to it, you have little idea of her motivation so I have to suppose that you have not been in a similar situation.

 

 

 

 


You've also made an assumption. 

 

Crikey wasn't referring to this woman in regards to vigilantes but in general.

 

And I 100% agree - if the law is changed and address of ex-criminals are disclosed as this woman is suggesting then the implications of this are enormous.

 

It doens't matter what crime you have committed, once you are deemed fit to be set free by law, then you are also entitled to be left to get on with your life. Unsavoury for some but for good reason.


what about notifying the victim when the offender moves close to her residence?  without disclosing the actual address. 

Message 40 of 99
Latest reply