Video footage not proof of assault, police say

Video footage of incident involving cyclist and pedestrian not proof of assault, police say

 

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-02-27/video-footage-alleged-cyclist-assault-not-sufficient-evidence...

 

allow a court to decide if it was an assault.

Message 1 of 14
Latest reply
13 REPLIES 13

Video footage not proof of assault, police say

and another thing....

 

Queensland Police Commissioner's wife has infringement notice for running stop sign torn up

 

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-02-27/wife-of-police-commissioner-has-infringement-notice-torn-up/1...

Message 2 of 14
Latest reply

Video footage not proof of assault, police say

imastawka
Honored Contributor

I agree it was assault, but no-one mentioned him riding on the footpath.

 

Was he on the footpath because it was a one way street and he was looking for a short cut?

 

If he'd stayed on the road, where cyclists should be IMO, then it wouldn't have happened.

Message 3 of 14
Latest reply

Video footage not proof of assault, police say

It is not illegal to ride on the footpath in Queensland, unless signs state otherwise, but cyclists must give way to pedestrians and ride in a way that does not inconvenience or endanger others.

Mr Stevenson said he was riding on the footpath because Hutton Lane was a one-way street, and he needed to travel in the opposite direction to get to work.

"I was as far over left as I could be. There was 2 metres to his left," Mr Stevenson said.

"One sidestep, that's all he needed to take and we would have both got past."

 

taken from the original story,

 

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-10-23/cyclist-pushed-off-bike-by-pedestrian-brisbane-qld/10418068

Message 4 of 14
Latest reply

Video footage not proof of assault, police say

if you watch the video the cyclist is well over to the left and the attacker is walking towards him and makes no effort to move over so the cyclist has more space.

Message 5 of 14
Latest reply

Video footage not proof of assault, police say

The attacker actually chased him down, after he'd passed him.

 

 

edit: my previous post was based on Victorian law.

Message 6 of 14
Latest reply

Video footage not proof of assault, police say

 

In Queensland the Rules state:

 

Riding on a footpath or shared path - 


On footpaths and shared paths, you share the space with pedestrians.


- You must: keep left and give way to all pedestrians
- Always ride to the left of bicycle riders coming toward you.

 

While the cyclist kept to the left he got awful close to the guy walking

and actually "brushed" him. He didn't give much way!

He even got close to the two people entering the crossing when he turned left.

 

I can understand the pedestrian getting p*ssed off, but he went out

of his way to physically assault the cyclist, and that's not on.

Message 7 of 14
Latest reply

Video footage not proof of assault, police say


@not_for_sale2025 wrote:

 

In Queensland the Rules state:

 

Riding on a footpath or shared path - 


On footpaths and shared paths, you share the space with pedestrians.


- You must: keep left and give way to all pedestrians
- Always ride to the left of bicycle riders coming toward you.

 

While the cyclist kept to the left he got awful close to the guy walking

and actually "brushed" him. He didn't give much way!

He even got close to the two people entering the crossing when he turned left.

 

I can understand the pedestrian getting p*ssed off, but he went out

of his way to physically assault the cyclist, and that's not on.

 

 

 


the cyclist couldnt ride much further to the left without going into the street from what i see. i'm thinking as it was a one way street going ino the street would have been against the law?

however, the walking guy made no effort to move across to avoid being 'brushed'

maybe he didnt have to by law but it looked to me like he was trying to get hit.

maybe he doesnt like cyclists using the footpath, cant say i dont agree, but if its legal and you cause yourself to be 'brushed' it sure doesnt give you the right to chase the guy and knock him down.

 

m personal view is footpaths are for walking traffic.

but those making the rules dont agree with me.

so if i saw a cyclist coming towards me i'd side step a bit just to be safe.

Message 8 of 14
Latest reply

Video footage not proof of assault, police say

The footpath outside my house has been made a shared path by 'the powers that be'

 

I sent a petition to the local council, but they don't care.

 

I have been narrowly missed by flying bicycles that don't bother slowing dow, or even using their bell to alert me.

 

Seems no-one has a bell anymore, let alone uses it.

 

They travel at a fair clip along this path.   Are there no speed laws for shared paths?

 

 

Message 9 of 14
Latest reply

Video footage not proof of assault, police say

The guy was actually looking to the left as he was coming up on a pedestrian walking the other way and he

 

couldn't go further left as the pace he was walking at he would've walked into them,(where they brushed the 2

 

pedestians would've been going past each other).

 

As stated the cyclist has to give way and he didn't.

Probably why the cops didn't pursue it as they would've maybe had to charge him with failing to give way,stubborn_smiley_by_mirz123-d4bt0te_zps12f1a5a3.gif

 

Pdestrian.JPG

 

Left.JPG

Message 10 of 14
Latest reply