Voting age debate hits Australia

Austria has lowered its voting age to 16, and Scotland may follow for its upcoming independence referendum.


But Australia should not follow suit, according to an ANU academic.


 


Professor Ian McAllister said allowing 16 and 17-year-olds to vote would not make young people more politically engaged or create a fairer democratic system.


 


In his study "The Politics of Lowering the Voting Age in Australia: Evaluating the Evidence," Mr McAllister used data from the Australian Election Study survey to evaluate some of the most commonly used arguments for giving younger people the vote.


 


Mr McAllister said 18, or sometimes 17, was the age when young people gained the right to do many things, including marry and drive a car, so a similar rule on voting age was not inequitable.


 


He said there was no evidence young people would become more engaged with the political process if the voting age was lowered, and young people had no more politic al knowledge now than they did two decades ago.


 


"In terms of political interest there's been very little change over the past 25 to 30 years, which surprised me a bit because if you look at the expansion of tertiary education... to 30 per cent of the population, you'd expect young people to be more interested in politics, but in fact they're not," he said.


 


ANU Politics and International Relations undergraduate student Amy MacKinnon, 23, disagreed.


 


Ms McKinnon recently debated Professor McAllister on the subject of lowing the voting age, and she said allowing 16-year-olds to vote would fight voter apathy.


 


"I think we need to catch people at a really young age and really teach them what the consequences of their vote really is," she said.


 


Ms McKinnon said older people were more aware of how public policy could change their lives.


 


"They've owned a house, they've paid rent, they've had a job, they've been tax payers and they've really had to stand up and pay attention because it has effected them, I don't think young people are aware of how significant the debates going on in Australia are," she said.




Read more: http://www.canberratimes.com.au/act-news/voting-age-debate-hits-australia-20130404-2h8ol.html#ixzz2P...


Message 1 of 12
Latest reply
11 REPLIES 11

Re: Voting age debate hits Australia

Reading letters in my newspaper from people who describe themselves as older  I could say that there would not be a problem with immaturity when it comes to 16 year olds being included in   politics, the same with watching  question time.


 


Just as many children who call themselves 'ministers'.

Message 11 of 12
Latest reply

Re: Voting age debate hits Australia


Trying to engage the twiterati & fbook users is a good thing but I feel that it's not going to work as most young teens don't even listen to the news, read papers, watch 4 corners or the drum or any other political forum.


 


They are not really engaged & therefore their vote would be purely on what their parents do.


 


I feel that many adults only vote because they have to & many vote for the "what's in it for me" mindset.


 


I feel that compulsory voting should be abolished.



 


If you did that the spending for political advertising would skyrocket and only the wealthy would  be able to afford run (like the US).


Also you know that the only party that wins would be the one with the most die hard voters and voters who do not work saturdays.

Message 12 of 12
Latest reply