What About The Children?

I am amazed and disgusted that in all the indignation over what Gillian Triggs should or shouldn't have done or who said or didn't say what to her, not ONE SINGLE POLITICIAN  except, finally, Malcolm Turnbull, has commented in any way on the contents of her report..

 

She found that  over a 15-month period from January 2013 to March 2014, spanning both the Labor and Coalition governments  there were 233 recorded assaults involving children and 33 incidents of reported sexual assault. 

 

If these findings are true - and as far as I know nobody has so far disputed them -   then what is going to be done about it? Who had the duty of care? who is going to be held responsible. What measures are going to be put in place to stop this abuse happening in future?

 

Both Gillian Triggs and George Brandis are astute and comparitively wealthy adults able to instruct top  legal practitioners to protect their reputaions - but who is going to protect the safety of these children? How many more children have been abused since March 2014? Is a child perhaps being abused in a detention centre  even while you are reading this post? 

 

Surely to goodness after all that was learned from the Children In Care Royal Commission this report cannot simply be put in a "don't want to know" basket while both sides of Pariament try to gain political mileage out the motives of the Human Rghts Commissioner or the behaviour of the Attourney General.

 

At some point -though probably not in the lifetime of this government  or even  the one that follows it - there will inevitably be a Royal Commission into the treatment of children in detention centre. what do you imagine its findings are likely to be?

Message 1 of 421
Latest reply
420 REPLIES 420

Re: What About The Children?


@vicr3000 wrote:

 

He should have just binned the report and got on with life.

 

It's not like he is going to do anything about it.

 

 

Glee,

I am still waiting for an answer

 

 


If the question was worthy of an answer an answer would have been given already.

Message 131 of 421
Latest reply

Re: What About The Children?


That is pathetic.

You can't deny that having no one arrive and no one in detention solves the problem.

Please explain how it wouldn't be a solution ?

Message 132 of 421
Latest reply

Re: What About The Children?


@gleee58 wrote:

@vicr3000 wrote:

 

Glee

 

You wants facts.

 

Here are the basic, absolutely raw facts.

 

 

"We wouldn't be in this mess if the Rudd (and Gillard) hadn't dismantled Howards system and allowed the flood

of Asylum Seekers to arrive.

 

No arrivals, no need for detention, no one in detention, no child abuse. Simple."

 

 

 

And I'll add, we wouldnt have had any drownings either, 1200 of them !


No, that is your opinion only and far removed from fact.


It's a valid opinion and a simple fact.

Message 133 of 421
Latest reply

Re: What About The Children?

It is simple yes. Simple does not equate to fact.

 

 

Message 134 of 421
Latest reply

Re: What About The Children?

So whats the answer then?

 

Anyone that arrives in Australia as a refugee, who has kids with them, should be just let into the community, given a house and welfare to live on?

or

Kids are removed from parents and placed in foster care. If the parents are found to be illegal, then the kids are given back to them and they are all kicked out of the country?

 

 photo walkingdeadtag_zpsbaca2fdd.jpg
Message 135 of 421
Latest reply

Re: What About The Children?


@gleee58 wrote:

It is simple yes. Simple does not equate to fact.

 


 

Glee

 

What is more factual than this occuring, in sequence ?

 

 

No arrivals, no need for detention, no one in detention, no child abuse. Simple.

 

Therefore problem solved.

 

Message 136 of 421
Latest reply

Re: What About The Children?

 

Definitely no house and definitely no welfare.

 

Adults stay in detention.

Foster care for kids is fine if they find someone willing.

 

"If the parents are found to be illegal, then the kids are given back to them and they are all kicked out of the country?"

 

YES, Definitely

 

 

 

And Sarah Hanson Young should be made to pay for it.

 

 

Message 137 of 421
Latest reply

Re: What About The Children?


@vicr3000 wrote:

glee

 

I can't believe you said that.

 

Please explain how if no one is in detention abuse can still occur in detention ??????

 

And how can it be removed from fact when if no boats come, their is no one new to detain.

 

 

I await your reply.

 

 


There were people in detention long before any boats arrived, and there will be people in detention long after any boats are stopped.

 

Why do you people fixate on boats?

Message 138 of 421
Latest reply

Re: What About The Children?


Yes, we know their are always people in detention, awaiting various things to happen.

But the BULK of them came from the illegal boats arriving.

You are always going to get trickles arriving by aircraft etc.


Message 139 of 421
Latest reply

Re: What About The Children?

Trickle?    Smiley LOL   50,000 a trickle?

Message 140 of 421
Latest reply