What About The Children?

I am amazed and disgusted that in all the indignation over what Gillian Triggs should or shouldn't have done or who said or didn't say what to her, not ONE SINGLE POLITICIAN  except, finally, Malcolm Turnbull, has commented in any way on the contents of her report..

 

She found that  over a 15-month period from January 2013 to March 2014, spanning both the Labor and Coalition governments  there were 233 recorded assaults involving children and 33 incidents of reported sexual assault. 

 

If these findings are true - and as far as I know nobody has so far disputed them -   then what is going to be done about it? Who had the duty of care? who is going to be held responsible. What measures are going to be put in place to stop this abuse happening in future?

 

Both Gillian Triggs and George Brandis are astute and comparitively wealthy adults able to instruct top  legal practitioners to protect their reputaions - but who is going to protect the safety of these children? How many more children have been abused since March 2014? Is a child perhaps being abused in a detention centre  even while you are reading this post? 

 

Surely to goodness after all that was learned from the Children In Care Royal Commission this report cannot simply be put in a "don't want to know" basket while both sides of Pariament try to gain political mileage out the motives of the Human Rghts Commissioner or the behaviour of the Attourney General.

 

At some point -though probably not in the lifetime of this government  or even  the one that follows it - there will inevitably be a Royal Commission into the treatment of children in detention centre. what do you imagine its findings are likely to be?

Message 1 of 421
Latest reply
420 REPLIES 420

Re: What About The Children?


She should know the answers and they didn't hound her.

That part was all voluntary, not under pressure.


She is so partisan, has been since 2001 when she criticised the war and 2003 when she said Howard should be tried for war crimes !

ie She hates the LNP


Message 311 of 421
Latest reply

Re: What About The Children?

 

Shamelessly copied from a post by     myoclonjerk    on another thread.

 

Thanks myoclonjerk 

 

 

Between 2000 and 2007 (the period which includes the introduction of the “Pacific Solution" for asylum seekers travelling by boat under the Coalition government), the database documents 746 reported deaths of asylum seekers. Of those, 363 asylum seekers died at sea while on their way to Australia. As well, 350 were presumed dead (their status is missing at sea with status yunknown); 22 died in detention (the majority of those cases were suicide, but there were some deaths of natural causes); and 11 people were returned to Afghanistan and reportedly murdered for being “Australian spies"


Between 2008 and July 2013 (under Labor), 877 asylum seekers have reportedly died. Of those, 15 committed suicide or died of natural causes in detention centres.

 

So during this period of Labor Governement, approximately 862 individuals died trying to reach Australia's mainland to seek asylum.


During the 2000-2007 period of Coalition government, 363 died, with the status of additional 350 individuals unknown.


Sara Davis-Griffith University. Factcheck.

 

 

 

Message 312 of 421
Latest reply

Re: What About The Children?


@vicr3000 wrote:

She should know the answers and they didn't hound her.

That part was all voluntary, not under pressure.


She is so partisan, has been since 2001 when she criticised the war and 2003 when she said Howard should be tried for war crimes !

ie She hates the LNP



What are you talking about?

 

Anyone who has seen her give evidence has to know she was hounded.

She has every right to take questions on notice.

 

At the recent hearing she answered every version of the same question over and over with consistency and evidence to back up her statements.

 

If you're going to accuse her of making a recommendation that Howard should be tried for war crimes back it up with some sort of proof.

Message 313 of 421
Latest reply

Re: What About The Children?


Suggested might be a better word and could be charged by the ICC.

The ICC, Another thing we should never have signed up for.
We don't need it, we have a perfectly good system here.


Message 314 of 421
Latest reply

Re: What About The Children?

 

IF she was hounded, well maybe she is coping exactly what Gov't minister and Others (non elected people)

cop from the likes of that useless SHY.

 

SHY has the audacity to hound others then complain when she perceives one of her own is hounded.

 

Hypocrisy !

 

 

Message 315 of 421
Latest reply

Re: What About The Children?

Thank goodness Brandis was censured for lying about Gillian Triggs.

 

Of course Abbott defends him.

 

http://thenewdaily.com.au/news/2015/03/02/brandis-condemned-triggs-saga/

Joono
Message 316 of 421
Latest reply

Re: What About The Children?

Bully boys and misogynists.  Back slappers.

Joono
Message 317 of 421
Latest reply

Re: What About The Children?


@vicr3000 wrote:

 

IF she was hounded, well maybe she is coping exactly what Gov't minister and Others (non elected people)

cop from the likes of that useless SHY.

 

SHY has the audacity to hound others then complain when she perceives one of her own is hounded.

 

Hypocrisy !

 

 


That's just rubbish. 

 

You clearly haven't watched the recording, which a blind person could see was hounding.

Message 318 of 421
Latest reply

Re: What About The Children?

 

Censured means nothing, they can't do nothing and Brandis will wear it as a badge of honour !

 

 

Sarah Two Dads should have been censured for some of her performances in the past,

but all she was made to do was apologise !

 

 

 

 Glee

 

I have watched it, thanks.

 

That's not hounding, she should be able to take questioning like that, after all, everyone else does in those committees,

 

WHAT MAKES HER ANY DIFFERENT ?

 

 

Message 319 of 421
Latest reply

Re: What About The Children?


@vicr3000 wrote:

 

Censured means nothing, they can't do nothing and Brandis will wear it as a badge of honour !

 

 

Sarah Two Dads should have been censured for some of her performances in the past,

but all she was made to do was apologise !

 

 

 

 Glee

 

I have watched it, thanks.

 

That's not hounding, she should be able to take questioning like that, after all, everyone else does in those committees,

 

WHAT MAKES HER ANY DIFFERENT ?

 

 


Proof or it didn't happen.

Message 320 of 421
Latest reply