on 11-04-2013 09:21 AM
on 13-04-2013 10:14 AM
Good article this morning
http://www.smh.com.au/technology/technology-news/building-todays-tech-tomorrow-20130412-2hqt0.html#
on 13-04-2013 06:21 PM
It will mean that you will get a message faster than from a runner with a note wedged into a forked stick.
on 13-04-2013 07:05 PM
this is malcolm turnbull's site.
take a look at the comments, would appear that they don't believe the (expletive expletive) (expletive) either
http://www.malcolmturnbull.com.au/media/launch-of-the-coalition-nationwide-broadband-survey/
on 14-04-2013 12:47 PM
FN, Sorry, the quote "I use Sat for everything and get great speeds, far better in fact than other people get via land based services," was in fact from MN12. So I will ask MN12:-
I am curious fron a technical point of view MN12FN as to what speeds you have and data allowance that will underwrite your above statement?
I have been on HFC (Telstra) land based cable for some years, could have a broadband connection of up to 100/2 Mbps. but happy with 10/1!
FN: ".....It will prove to be a barrier to investment. It will not offer the upload ability people want."
Considering that the accepted domestic download:upload ratio is 10:1, the bread and butter NBN plan is 12:1 for their 12Mbs plan, and the proposed FTTN easily covers this, where do you get the idea that "people" want greater upload ability?
Not that most people have any idea what their actual upload speed is, or their download, and it is the latter which is the most important for the average domestic user.
However, there are plenty of plans that allow greater upload speeds to the point of 1:1, and of course cost more.
on 14-04-2013 12:55 PM
from eloi's link
AFR, 21/8: “Malcolm Turnbull [...] has a fully costed policy document ready to go”
ABC, 24/9: “The Coalition says it will not be able to provide a fully costed broadband policy by the next election”
on 14-04-2013 01:06 PM
Considering that the accepted domestic download:upload ratio is 10:1, the bread and butter NBN plan is 12:1 for their 12Mbs plan, and the proposed FTTN easily covers this, where do you get the idea that "people" want greater upload ability?
Not that most people have any idea what their actual upload speed is, or their download, and it is the latter which is the most important for the average domestic user.
However, there are plenty of plans that allow greater upload speeds to the point of 1:1, and of course cost more.
The out dated domestic ratio might be 10:1, which is proving to be a serious limitation these days for many. In the old days we did not upload much at all. These days we are uploading more and more. 10 years ago we didn't even use phones as cameras like so many do now. We didn't backup online either or work collaboratively online. 20 years ago hardly anyone had heard of the internet. Times change and our habits and needs change with the times.
The 12/1 plan is not the NBN bread and butter plan. It is expected that only light users will take up the 12/1 plan. Telstra don't even offer a 12/1 plan. The 2 most popular plans are 100/40 and 25/5.
The idea of the NBN is ubiquity. So everyone can access the network for a reasonable price. So those in all areas can connect to minimum 12/1 broadband. The wholesale price is the same on all technologies. The competition is at the retail level.
Yes, we all know if you've got enough money you can get a 1/1 connection but most are not able to afford anything like that. Most businesses can't even afford a fibre connection if they are not in a FTTP area.
on 14-04-2013 01:13 PM
on 14-04-2013 02:09 PM
coalition's nbn will mean a pain in the rrrs, for residents/owners of flats and units
read up, from delimiter
http://delimiter.com.au/2013/04/10/25mbps-in-flats-turnbull-dreaming-says-strata-association/
familiar avatar there, one of the comments, tom
on 14-04-2013 07:52 PM
on 14-04-2013 07:54 PM
this is a 50/20 result
the other one was a 100/40