on โ06-02-2015 09:57 AM
on โ06-02-2015 11:00 AM
Creative
That also doesn't factor in the make aspect either, both for sex and for creating babies that carry on his genes in the world.
Just a thought !
I don't have kids.
on โ06-02-2015 11:02 AM
In Africa and to our north it is.
And a fair few live there.
And who said women go hunting ?
Men going hunting, women go gathering !
on โ06-02-2015 11:04 AM
on โ06-02-2015 11:05 AM
@creative*crisis wrote:
Marriage is an institution created by humans mainly for financial reasons, nature is more interested in creating as much diversity in the species to insure it's survival
Some birds pair for life. However genetic test show that some species, are quite promiscuous, and many babies in one nest are fathered by different male. Which is good for maintaining diversity of the species, while staying with one partner assures welfare of the babies.
on โ06-02-2015 11:06 AM
on โ06-02-2015 11:09 AM
@vicr3000 wrote:
And who said women go hunting ?
Men going hunting, women go gathering !
Yes, and if man had 3 wives and each had number of kids, he would have to hunt enough for all of them.
โ06-02-2015 11:13 AM - edited โ06-02-2015 11:15 AM
This guy can hunt, and shoot, in fact he is damn good at both.
Problem is, welfare, a supermarket and Fray Bentos pies are far easier.
Standard diet in camps
on โ06-02-2015 11:15 AM
I might say it's not wrong, Bob. Can't wait to meet your 10, 15 or 20 wives..
on โ06-02-2015 11:26 AM
@**bob_on_the_go** wrote:Go.
Regarding the original question.......
Obviously for some people in some situations it works , while for others it would be unthinkable. I say let each of us tread the path that works best for us and most importantly for the children of the union/s
on โ06-02-2015 11:27 AM
@***super_nova*** wrote:
@vicr3000 wrote:
Then why is Polygamy so widespread ?Is it?
In the distant past child needed 2 parents to survive, at least for few years. Woman alone could hardly go hunting with an infant or 2 in her arms. So, one woman and one man would have usually baby every 2 years. It would be hard for man to provide for 2 families, until the society became more developed, and man did not have to personally do all the work.
I do not have a problem with what ever structure of family people choose; their lives, their choice.
I depends how distant the distant past is..... if it was caveman times they lived in tribes didn't they? So everyone would provide for each other. It's probably the same in some other tribes now. Interesting idea to explore.