on 08-06-2013 12:29 PM
Zip-pah-dee-dew-dah, zippadie-eh
My oh my what a wonderful May,
Just a Minnie --
I think it is June
Zippa-a-dee-do-dah-zippahdee-moon!
on 08-06-2013 07:54 PM
There was an amethyst on offer as well but that was a shoddy article
ROFLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
FUNNIEST COMMENT OF THE YEAR!!!!!!
on 08-06-2013 07:55 PM
Good story.;-):-D:-x
See you don't know every/anything, am*3 😉
on 08-06-2013 07:58 PM
It's a fallacy to believe that just because something does not cost much it is not of quality.
For instance I purchased a .73 carat solitaire diamond in a white gold setting for just under $1000.
Both the gold and the diamond have lasted the test of time, millions of years, and no doubt they will still be around when all of us here are either vampires or dust.:)
So true, poddster. I believe good quality jewellery to be one sound investment when collecting. Other things like autographs, antique furniture, paintings, are so easy to fake but it is relatively easy for a reputable jeweller with the right tools to unmask a fake stone.
Having said that, the items I bought were not in the league of your ring at all, and I have no problem with that, as I'm sure I'll find a use for them 🙂
on 08-06-2013 07:59 PM
You bought from the OP of the Woeful Sales thread, didn't ya! LOL
I bought from some very nice sellers. Actually, they had some nice, more expensive items for sale that I may buy in future.
on 08-06-2013 08:02 PM
See you don't know every/anything, am*3 😉
Yes, I do;-)
on 08-06-2013 08:04 PM
There was an amethyst on offer as well but that was a shoddy article
You can give me a .73 solitaire diamond over an amethyst any day...;-)
on 08-06-2013 08:05 PM
Yes, I do;-)
"It's what you learn after you know it all that counts." John Wooden
on 08-06-2013 08:05 PM
Yes, I do;-)
Then you must have very low self esteem.
on 08-06-2013 08:08 PM
Lame comeback:-D
on 08-06-2013 08:12 PM
$12.20 is great value for quality items.
are you seriously spying on the purchases this person makes?
for what reason?