on 24-10-2015 01:18 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ayaItdH5huc
The bleeding hearts think just let them in as many as want to come.When you show them what is happening they refuse to listen.
on 24-10-2015 03:14 PM
And the fact that they come and then try to impose their values is lost on you isnt it?
Which particular values have any of them tried to impose on you?
on 24-10-2015 03:20 PM
@*julia*2010 wrote:Has it ever occurred to you that the handful of Nazi war criminals who managed to escape justice by travelling with false papers, comprised only an insignificent percentage of the refugees resettled after WWll and that the same ratio applies to all those currently seeking asylum in Europe
i have never come across this information.
where did you obtain the statistics from?
what are they exactly?
what were those nazi war criminals' plans
in their new countries?
why are you making this comparison?
http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/very-last-hunt-for-war-criminals-20120818-24f3e.html
on 24-10-2015 03:20 PM
@the_great_she_elephant wrote:And the fact that they come and then try to impose their values is lost on you isnt it?
Which particular values have any of them tried to impose on you?
i think the op is talking about what
is happening in europe and has given
examples.
where did the op say he/she was personally
affected?
on 24-10-2015 03:24 PM
@*julia*2010 wrote:wow did you read the comments
under the video?
Yes many are very unhappy in europe at what their so called leaders are doing.
on 24-10-2015 03:28 PM
@the_great_she_elephant wrote:
@*julia*2010 wrote:Has it ever occurred to you that the handful of Nazi war criminals who managed to escape justice by travelling with false papers, comprised only an insignificent percentage of the refugees resettled after WWll and that the same ratio applies to all those currently seeking asylum in Europe
i have never come across this information.
where did you obtain the statistics from?
what are they exactly?
what were those nazi war criminals' plans
in their new countries?
why are you making this comparison?
http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/very-last-hunt-for-war-criminals-20120818-24f3e.html
ok thanks.
that answers a couple of questions such
as what were their plans:
All had done well in Australia, where they had raised families and had become well-regarded in their communities. Almost 10 years ago, all were 85 or older. They had retired and were living out their days in varying degrees of health. Some lived independently alone or with their wives, while others were nearing the end in nursing homes.
it does not answer the question:
why are you making this comparison?
on 24-10-2015 03:38 PM
@*julia*2010 wrote:
@the_great_she_elephant wrote:
@*julia*2010 wrote:Has it ever occurred to you that the handful of Nazi war criminals who managed to escape justice by travelling with false papers, comprised only an insignificent percentage of the refugees resettled after WWll and that the same ratio applies to all those currently seeking asylum in Europe
i have never come across this information.
where did you obtain the statistics from?
what are they exactly?
what were those nazi war criminals' plans
in their new countries?
why are you making this comparison?
http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/very-last-hunt-for-war-criminals-20120818-24f3e.html
ok thanks.
that answers a couple of questions such
as what were their plans:
All had done well in Australia, where they had raised families and had become well-regarded in their communities. Almost 10 years ago, all were 85 or older. They had retired and were living out their days in varying degrees of health. Some lived independently alone or with their wives, while others were nearing the end in nursing homes.
it does not answer the question:
why are you making this comparison?
Oh, well that makes it alright then - I'm sure the families of their victims were all very happy for them.
No hey weren't trying to impose their ideology on us -.they had already tried and failed and there weren't enough of them left.
The point is they were no more representative of the displaced persons given sanctuary in Australia then than the (alleged) extremists currently entering Europe are representative of sll those fleeing the turmoil in the Middle East.
on 24-10-2015 03:44 PM
@the_great_she_elephant wrote:Has it ever occurred to you that "Europe not able to accept everyone who wants a better (safer) life" does not equate to "These people are scumbags who don't deserve a better (safer) life."
Has it ever occurred to you that thousands of innocent people are going to die because Europe is not able to accommodate them, and that acknowledging the inability of europe to take them all does not and should not prevent one's heart from bleeding for for them.
Has it ever occurred to you that the handful of Nazi war criminals who managed to escape justice by travelling with false papers, comprised only an insignificent percentage of the refugees resettled after WWll and that the same ratio applies to all those currently seeking asylum in Europe
The difference between you and me is clear.I remember you saying several years ago that it would be better to convert to islam rather than die.I do not accept that.
But no matter what is going on in the world too many try to say "these poor people just want a chance" and bury their heads to what is really happening.
In UK now they have sharia law courts.They have sharia patrols telling people not to drink etc.You seem to think that is ok.
on 24-10-2015 03:49 PM
Sharia Courts are not recognised in the UK as Courts of Law.
They can perform legally binding marriages - that is it.
They mostly deal with disputes within the Muslim Community.
on 24-10-2015 03:52 PM
@cmcoins2000 wrote:Sharia Courts are not recognised in the UK as Courts of Law.
They can perform legally binding marriages - that is it.
They mostly deal with disputes within the Muslim Community.
They deal with disputes.A 2 tier legal system.
on 24-10-2015 03:55 PM
Oh, well that makes it alright then - I'm sure the families of their victims were all very happy for them.
no, it doesn't make it alright - it makes
it totally irrelevant to this topic.
The point is they were no more representative of the displaced persons given sanctuary in Australia then than the (alleged) extremists currently entering Europe are representative of sll those fleeing the turmoil in the Middle East.
the point is moot because the op is talking
about a percentage of people whose goal is
completely different to that of escaping nazi
criminals.
the 'point' is irrelevant and detracting from the
real issue of the current situation re EU open
borders policy. maybe watch the content of
the op before commenting?