wasnt joe so good on q and a

[dellynt]

He rocked and preformed  and well

well done joe......

[dellynt]

Joe was Great! There was not a moment in the whole of Q&A tonight that I thought he was behind, and this is enemy territory. But most importantly, this was even when the one-eyed Tony Jones tried to sandbag the Treasurer with a NATSEM study that had not been released EXCEPT TO THE ABC!!! And without showing the level of disgust he no doubt felt at such obvious ALP-ABC gotcha attempts to undermine the Treasurer, he simply turned it aside. He embarrassed the ABC for its obvious duplicity.

[icyfroth]

---

@konadely wrote:

Joe was Great! There was not a moment in the whole of Q&A tonight that I thought he was behind, and this is enemy territory. But most importantly, this was even when the one-eyed Tony Jones tried to sandbag the Treasurer with a NATSEM study that had not been released EXCEPT TO THE ABC!!! And without showing the level of disgust he no doubt felt at such obvious ALP-ABC gotcha attempts to undermine the Treasurer, he simply turned it aside. He embarrassed the ABC for its obvious duplicity.

---

That was funny about the GST on Tampons. I've been listening to that debate on Hack lately. Apparently there's a GST on feminine hygiene products but not on condoms or lubricants.

I agree that's not right.

They should either drop GST on Tampons, or put it on Condoms and lubricants.

[polksaladallie]

Why?

[icyfroth]

---

@polksaladallie wrote:

Why?

---

to make it fair

[polksaladallie]

You know there is madness behind my comment.  Both M and F use all of them.

And of course I agree with you.

[gleee58]

---

@icyfroth wrote:

---

@polksaladallie wrote:

Why?

---

to make it fair

---

Tampons are surely not in the same category as condoms and lubricants.  

No, no, no.  

There is no similarity in any way.

[icyfroth]

---

@gleee58 wrote:

---

@icyfroth wrote:

---

@polksaladallie wrote:

Why?

---

to make it fair

---

Tampons are surely not in the same category as condoms and lubricants.  

No, no, no.  

There is no similarity in any way.

---

well they are related lol.

[gleee58]

---

@icyfroth wrote:

---

@gleee58 wrote:

---

@icyfroth wrote:

---

@polksaladallie wrote:

Why?

---

to make it fair

---

Tampons are surely not in the same category as condoms and lubricants.  

No, no, no.  

There is no similarity in any way.

---

well they are related lol.

---

Who uses lubricant or condoms with their tampons?

They're not related in any way and while women might use all three at different times, men never need a tampon.

[the_great_she_elephant]

Who uses lubricant or condoms with their tampons?

They're not related in any way and while women might use all three at different times, men never need a tampon.

Using a tampon as a contraceptive or a condom in place of a tampon could have rather unpleasant consequences.