on โ27-08-2013 07:51 PM
on โ27-08-2013 11:05 PM
on โ27-08-2013 11:27 PM
I don't send a message, unless I have to clarify something about the sale.
I do try to ensure that I leave feedback before buyer leaves feedback for me and that in the feedback I leave I confirm actual post date sent and I post within the timeframe required for automatic five and upload tracking details.
My communication DSRs are at a consistent five - so I am going to keep on doing what I am doing.
on โ28-08-2013 12:22 AM
I send one message confirming that payment has been received and the item has been posted. Many buyers thank me for letting them know. I have DSR of 5 for communication over 13000 sales.
on โ28-08-2013 12:54 AM
Dave, I think you are exactly right.
In my experience, on any survey you care to name, it isn't often most people will mark the extremes.
Even if they liked something, they would often give it a 4 out of 5 and would never realise that was any problem.
on โ28-08-2013 09:11 AM
I will be repeating myself here, but I maintain the star ratings should be a buying guide only, not a hidden demotion system.
Just recently I received one star for 'item as described' from a buyer who didn't read the description, on an item they won for less than $2. Not only did it have what it was in the title, it was also written in the description and pictured. I have no idea how they got it wrong. They also marked me one star on postage, although it was posted within 12 hours of payment and she received it three days later. Yet because they are supposed to be 'anonymous' I can't even mention it or get it removed.
It irritates me that someone who can't be bothered to read the description or look at the pictures can actually have an affect on my standing with ebay. And consequently my income. Stupid system.
on โ28-08-2013 01:50 PM
"Iโve heard from a number of sellers that their DSRs as off 31st of July has mysteriously improved overnight with a sprinkling of low 1 or 2 star ratings disappearing. Suddenly from being in danger of losing TRS theyโre safe, or for sellers who donโt qualify for TRS suddenly theyโre very close to hitting the level required.
Now it appears itโs an official eBay program which is actively searching for low DSR scores that appear unfair, and removing them. On a thread on the Business Seller board a seller reports their dashboard displaying โYour seller performance level has been adjusted. Your seller performance level has been adjusted in your favor. Because your low detailed seller ratings (DSRs) were from a small number of buyers and these ratings were inconsistent with your performance history, they did not count in your current evaluation.โ
eBay are proactively looking for checking for malicious DSRs to address the โone buyer can take me downโ concern that many sellers have. Interestingly eBay told us that โIn those cases, the Feedback is not removed โ we reduce the impact of the low DSRs from those few buyers so that a single buyer does not have an undue impact on a sellerโ.
DSRs, especially due to their anonymity, are the hardest form of feedback eBay sellers have ever had to manage. Probably the only thing that comes close is from the very early days of eBay when you could leave feedback for members with whom you hadnโt even transacted.
As sellers are in the main unable even to identify which buyers have left them low DSR scores itโs reassuring that eBay are actively managing feedback on sellerโs behalf. Itโs even more reassuring to keep hearing from sellers who have benefited from DSR adjustments. If you believe youโve received some unfairly low DSRs get in touch with support and ask them to take a look at your scores and ask if there is a case for them to be adjusted"