Sellers may get help from AusPost in INR cases.

[Anonymous]

I heard something totally creepy the other day which set the cogs turning.

A good friend of ours mentioned that she had to make excuses and leave a mothers club

meeting because of a particular topic of discussion.

Some of these creatures were talking about going through ebay listings looking for sellers that

didn't offer Signature on Delivery, with a view to snapping up free items.

Such a shame that C & S dropped the $1.50 SOD but they do have $100 insurance cover
for only $1.00

If a buyer hits me with an INR case then an AusPost investigation should sort them out.

It would be way to either officially confirm item delivery or for me to get my money back.

[Anonymous]

Are you sure YOU didn't make up those surveys...lol

[sparrow2207]

---

@i-love-my-sheep wrote:

---

@Anonymous wrote:

Ebay's reasoning for introducing changes in rules has always been laughable in a non-funny way.

Remember the justification for removing a seller's right to leave negative feedback.

"Buyers have indicated...."

For all we know 3 buyers planet wide were curled up in a foetal position as a result of being negged.

Quantification has never been ebay's strong suit.

They have used skewed surveys to justify changes.

As a buyer would you.

A. Want my money back if an item is not as described.

B. Want my money back if I woke up on the wrong side of the bed.

C. Not want any money back under any circumstances.

---

D. Want my money back because I'm a slimy askhole who likes to rip people off and get away with it.

E. Have no accountability because the buyer is always right

---

F. Get item for free because I do a good pouty face because I don't think I should pay anything if I can tell enough lies.

G. Everything on ebay should be free.