on โ19-08-2014 09:28 PM
Just received a letter today stating the stamps I used were not valid for postage. The stamps I purchased were Un franked No Gum. I used them for postage as we all do. Where do I stand? Where does the seller stand that sold them to me? Who is responsible for the fine. The seller of the original List did state unfranked cheap postage contact Me. AP stated the stamps have been canceled. I bought the stamps in good faith thinking Cheap Postage.. I now have to outlay the original 70 Cents plus $4.90 Admin. costs and delivery fees Total $5.60 ??????????????????? Can I pass this to the seller of the stamps?. In my work Place There is a chain Of Responsibility
on โ21-08-2014 02:53 PM
valid point, I've had items returned to me too. altho i wondered if two addresses on the front would confuse the sorters, then you did say top lefthand corner. was that what the AP told you was best?
on โ21-08-2014 04:29 PM
@onekiwi0 wrote:valid point, I've had items returned to me too. altho i wondered if two addresses on the front would confuse the sorters, then you did say top lefthand corner. was that what the AP told you was best?
top LH corner in print smaller than the TO: address is printed is the correct positioning of the senders address
on โ21-08-2014 04:32 PM
Not sure what is going on.
My senders address is far larger than my Post To: address.
Tried everything to enlarge but can't - so far.
Think all at Aust Post will be going for eye tests.
Always put my stamp on the rear of the package.
on โ21-08-2014 11:45 PM
I think in the US they put the senders address in the top left corner. Every snail mail letter I've got from friends has always been done that way, for as long as I can remember. Even my pen pal when I was in high school used to do it that way and that was a LOOONG time ago!