on โ28-10-2014 03:17 PM
Hello ๐ I sent out an Ebay item last week by large letter and today it came back to me marked RTS.
Do you think I should contact the buyer? Or wait for the buyer to contact me? If I do contact the buyer, what kind of message should I send?
Do I offer a refund? The entire amount or the amount minus postage? Or do I offer to resend it and ask politely if they could send a little extra for shipping? Or send it again for free?
Thank you!
Solved! Go to Solution.
on โ28-10-2014 08:51 PM
In my cases the PO said definitely NO ! They have delivered, or attempted delivery once, so they have met their obligation and I had to pay again - I should add, my PO staff are adorable and generally extremely helpful
on โ28-10-2014 11:06 PM
I suspect AP wouldn't make another attempt with my letter, either - the name / adress on the front has a black X through it, with RTS marked on the back, so they'd probably query why I'd want to attempt delivery to the same address, when appearances indicate it was refused. (Still none the wiser about exactly why it was returned, though).
on โ29-10-2014 10:57 AM
on โ29-10-2014 05:09 PM
Some buyers need to get a clue.
If wanting delivery to their work address they must put a C/- xyz as part of the address otherwise AP may not deliver. Sometimes there are more than one business at that address or on that floor and as a seller I don't know where that person works (my crystal ball is all foggy on these issues).
I just shake my head.
on โ29-10-2014 07:32 PM
โ29-10-2014 07:43 PM - edited โ29-10-2014 07:48 PM
I had one residence, two addresses.
one recognised at council level, the other recognised at State/Federal level.
exactly the same house...as some services recognised the one street but not the other, I had mail delivered to both. The posties knew of this ridiculous situation and were great at delivering the mail. If the regular posties were on holiday, sometimes mail would be returned. Both addresses were therefore accurate, but either might not be acceptable to use, depending on whether it was considered correct by the sender/online address database.
An unusual thing, I know, but just throwing it into the mix ๐
on โ29-10-2014 11:32 PM
on โ30-10-2014 08:09 AM
Yes, it meant training new posties ๐