on 10-09-2015 10:03 AM
a lot of posters keep thinking that if its written in the law ,thats it. well wrong ,ask any solicitor.
if that was the case we would not need any courts.
a law is written for instance law 1. then there is only if a or f or section bla , does not ocur.
lets talk about photos in a post office, once you hand over your letters and as soon as the postman stamps them ,they are deemed to be the property of the federal gov. once you touch or take a photo ,then theres privacy laws. its simple its not yours anymore.
we also have posters complaining about paypal taking money out of your account when there is a problem.
read your contract with them , you agreed to there policy ,if you dont agree dont sign up or take the contract to a solicitor.
just because something is said in the law , companies have agreements with them . like the bank on charge backs the law states a bank cant take money out of another banks client. but the banks have an agreement that allows that. and we all know that happens.
look at the law about porn movies , i still have had nobody answere that. its simple the law states porn movies can only be sold in canberra. have a look around most suburbs have an adult shop. i would say there is an agreement with the law. these shops are not hidden , some are the size of small supermarkets.
in fact a couple of months ago i won an auction on ebay for some new steel paint tins and lids , when she gave me the pick up details it was to an adult bookstore , i then looked at the item number in case i bid on the wrong line, but all correct. anyway i drive to the loading bay ,she opened up the roller door and my eyes nearly popped out , as i was loading the boxes , i did not ask why they had new empty paint tins , but i did ask why the girl on the corner wearing just underwear was smiling at me ,she said thats a blow up doll , yes but whats her name. lol
on 11-09-2015 10:05 PM
Joe, exactly what law is the above referring to? I suspect it might have to do with retail sales where the items for sale are in a shop or shopping mall environment that are open to the public.
Try looking up the rules for on line sales and distance sales. I think you will find they are two very different sets of rules.
Nobody has the right to demand to come onto your private property to collect goods and no courier is going to argue the point with someone who does not want them to take the goods.
on 11-09-2015 10:07 PM
padi padi look i knew about the photo part its only common sense , and i read about it a long time ago a few have know verified ,
this is from the horses mouth ,not mine come on as i said i sould not spell all those words in fact prob 5 words i dont even know what they mean . if nobody in the next couple of days verifys it i will give you a link there.
on 11-09-2015 10:12 PM
To me that says that once the carrier has it then it's the buyers.But how is it? The buyer physically doesn't have it.
So how can it be the same as if the buyer picked it up?
on 11-09-2015 10:12 PM
yes its correct it means if the buyer goes to the sellers place and picks it up , or his courier goes to the place and picks up its the same so if the buyer drops it its his business and if the courier drops it its between the buyer and his courier. in other words if you come to my place and pick up a can of paint there is no more responsibility with the seller or f you employ a carrier the same thing
on 11-09-2015 10:13 PM
Why can't you verify it or provide the link here and now joe ? Or does your horse's mouth with a law degree not know how to use a computer?
on 11-09-2015 10:18 PM
Why do we have to wait a couple of days for you to post a link to verify the information? Surely we are not going to keep arguing the point for a few more days?
And which horse is spouting forth these rules? I suspect it might be in relation to a completely different thread that has very little bearing on this one.
on 11-09-2015 10:20 PM
Thats how i read it to. The part about "handing" to carrier, so that would mean i hand the article over, not pickup the article...... Wouldn't it??
on 11-09-2015 10:20 PM
sorry for my delay i had to fix upa few things , i have always had a copy but its a very well respected law man on these posts , which i used to niggle with him and everybody told me and prob you that he should know not me anyway its the [tall bearded] post 404 message 44
on 11-09-2015 10:24 PM
its the seller handing it to the courier
lyndal link here surely you did not think it was my writing please i still dont have a dictionary.
by the way i used to argue the same way to the horses mouth like you guys are know, lol
on 11-09-2015 10:26 PM