on 10-09-2015 10:03 AM
a lot of posters keep thinking that if its written in the law ,thats it. well wrong ,ask any solicitor.
if that was the case we would not need any courts.
a law is written for instance law 1. then there is only if a or f or section bla , does not ocur.
lets talk about photos in a post office, once you hand over your letters and as soon as the postman stamps them ,they are deemed to be the property of the federal gov. once you touch or take a photo ,then theres privacy laws. its simple its not yours anymore.
we also have posters complaining about paypal taking money out of your account when there is a problem.
read your contract with them , you agreed to there policy ,if you dont agree dont sign up or take the contract to a solicitor.
just because something is said in the law , companies have agreements with them . like the bank on charge backs the law states a bank cant take money out of another banks client. but the banks have an agreement that allows that. and we all know that happens.
look at the law about porn movies , i still have had nobody answere that. its simple the law states porn movies can only be sold in canberra. have a look around most suburbs have an adult shop. i would say there is an agreement with the law. these shops are not hidden , some are the size of small supermarkets.
in fact a couple of months ago i won an auction on ebay for some new steel paint tins and lids , when she gave me the pick up details it was to an adult bookstore , i then looked at the item number in case i bid on the wrong line, but all correct. anyway i drive to the loading bay ,she opened up the roller door and my eyes nearly popped out , as i was loading the boxes , i did not ask why they had new empty paint tins , but i did ask why the girl on the corner wearing just underwear was smiling at me ,she said thats a blow up doll , yes but whats her name. lol
on 12-09-2015 06:07 PM
@joethenuts wrote:i think ima can handle her self lyndal she can give as good as she takes, but if it did upset her i apoligise.
by he way thats the second larest panties i have seen today lol
Whether stawka can handle herself or was upset is not the issue here.
You ridiculed completely correct information and if nothing else that is rude.
12-09-2015 06:23 PM - edited 12-09-2015 06:26 PM
@meekamag2 wrote:By the way, haven't seen anything from him in a long time. Hope he's OK. Can somoneone please put my mind at rest? He has given so much good avice to so many of us.
funnily enough, TB stopped posting a couple of weeks after joethenuts started posting and questioning his posts and the validity of the information based on the low feedback and buying/selling experience of the tall_bearded01 posting ID and not the content of the posts. The experience of the TB ids has not changed, but joe's view of the advice from TB has done a full 180 degree turnaround. It is a shame that TB is not around here to offer comment on joe's interpretations of his advice. There are some comments on the last thread TB posted on.
12-09-2015 06:36 PM - edited 12-09-2015 06:38 PM
we all have opinions
maybe you should apologise to michele they way you talked to her was very rude
but if thats the way you are fair enough
on 12-09-2015 06:37 PM
. . . . . . and, while looking back at TB's posts in March, I found this one regarding ownership of items sent by carrier
If TB's advice is deemed to be accurate/true then I guess nothing more needs to be said about who owns lodged items, as HE posted that they belong to the buyer while in custody of the carrier, just as many of us have been posting for the last couple of days.
12-09-2015 06:44 PM - edited 12-09-2015 06:45 PM
oh you agree with the tallbearded1 now a person who sits on 2 fences , he is right thats why the seller cant photo it because the seller dont own it, once its transfired to aus post. anyway k1000 do you still have that pretty dress you wore when you came to my place early this year to pick up paint or did you sell it on ebay.
on 12-09-2015 06:58 PM
on 12-09-2015 06:59 PM
joe, I have never bought paint from you!
I have taken each post of TB on its merits, just as everyone should for posts on a public forum. I have agreed with some of his posts, and disagreed with others (most notably the one where he said a buyer can pickup even if pickup wasn't offered, or insist on the use of a courier of the buyer's choice).
What you call fence sitting I call scrutiny. I scrutinised TB's posts and make up my mind about each one based on a number of factors. It doesn't pay to blindly agree with a poster on every one of their posts.
I posted the screengrab about item ownership during transit because I know you now worship the posts of TB and thought that that one may have been one you had forgotten about.
on 12-09-2015 07:05 PM
well i dont know with all your ids who you were , but did you not post today you brought paint from me this year. yes or no
on 12-09-2015 07:09 PM
@joethenuts wrote:well i dont know with all your ids who you were , but did you not post today you brought paint from me this year. yes or no
I'll take as long to answer your question as you took to answer mine in this thread . . . . okay!
on 12-09-2015 07:13 PM
cut and paste , i wont use it anyway i think we have had enough for another topic good to hear from you again , i love it when you get going . i am going to watch my bulldogs now catch up with you at our next meeting love joethenuts