on โ18-09-2013 03:20 AM
on โ18-09-2013 10:39 PM
From the UK hey....They must do things a little different over there. JMO of course. Something seems strange about your explanation.
on โ18-09-2013 10:42 PM
on โ18-09-2013 10:45 PM
What is wrong with what I have said?
on โ18-09-2013 10:46 PM
it's quite obvious, Lyndal. Your experiences don't align with others' prejudices.
on โ18-09-2013 10:52 PM
For a start your explanation does not make any sense. It is written as PJs writes. And you both have a connection to the UK. Seems sus to me.
on โ18-09-2013 10:53 PM
I judge the facts.......
on โ18-09-2013 10:59 PM
on โ18-09-2013 11:00 PM
To lyndal1838 . It is possible I guess that the seller got the insurance money back. In which case the seller I guess would lose the dispute.
on โ18-09-2013 11:01 PM
on โ18-09-2013 11:14 PM
It's not exactly inconsistent, since we're talking about an overseas transaction. A UK seller would need to provide proof of delivery to qualify for seller protection; a scanning event showing the parcel as delivered would have only worked in their favour if they also provided documentation that showed the delivery address (with matching tracking number).
That being said, I do not recommend relying on PayPal buyer protection, particularly for domestic transactions because the PP user agreement now states that a buyer is ineligible for protection if the seller has proof of postage.