on 06-07-2019 04:26 PM
I just completed the purchase on two items.
In checkout a notice came up stating that because the items were discounted, combined shipping is not available.
On this occasion it was still worth paying the postage twice, as the discount was significant.
I have written to the seller pointing out what has occurred and hopefully a small refund.
I find this situation perplexing, both as a buyer and seller.
As a buyer, if the discount is smallish, I could find the total cost more than if I paid full price but with combined shipping.
As a seller, this appears to be a disincentive for to customers purchase multiple items, if on sale at a discount.
on 08-07-2019 04:45 PM
No need to yell. I'm done.
on 08-07-2019 05:23 PM
No yelling. I often use capitals as I find it easier to read what I wrote.
08-07-2019 11:30 PM - edited 08-07-2019 11:30 PM
Internet etiquette, that is, netiquette, capitals means yelling. Internet 101. Has been since the dawn on the information super highway. I don't like being yelled at unless it's warranted. It's not warranted on these forums.
on 09-07-2019 12:20 AM
on 09-07-2019 09:18 AM
Given every other post by padraic doesn't contain ALL CAPS, I think tippy has a fair point.
on 09-07-2019 11:08 AM
@padraicpaul91 wrote:No yelling. I often use capitals as I find it easier to read what I wrote.
If you're having problems with reading the text, it might help to type it in a bigger font.
This is size 3, for instance.
Sometimes text that is all in caps can actually be harder to read.
on 09-07-2019 02:49 PM
, springyzone.
A minor frustration is in the way these forums have been coded - re the full and the mobile version.
The default text size, font and style on this forum are set by CSS properties and the size is probably something along the lines of 100%. The font and size options within the message body override the default text properties but frustratingly they are absolute browser-specific sizes (text size=1, text size=2, etc.) The browser default is 3 if no size is selected by the page designer.
Because the text size has been set (or I so assume) to a %, there isn't any match between the selectable text size options and the default size in these boards.
The frustration bit is when one uses the text size options here to change the text size for clarity or emphasis. How the text appears in the desktop version is not how the text appears on a mobile device even if one's using the "full" version. For example, springyzone, "This is size 3, for instance" is larger than the default text size when accessing this thread on a computer, but if I look at it on my iPhone (in the full version), it's smaller than the default text size (the rest of the text).
(Size 4 is closer to the default text size on a mobile device full version, but larger on a desktop. Oh, the joys of inconsistent web architecture!)
Re text in ALL CAPS being harder to read - yes. I have seen one paper discussing an extremely limited study (using 2 visually impaired participants and 2 normal-visioned participants) where the conclusion was different to that normally found, but the limits and methodology of the study had me tsk-tsking.
In general, reading a substantial amount of text in upper-case is not as easy as reading a substantial amount of text in sentence-case. One reason is that this is how we normally read text, so we are "trained" to be able to read such text relatively swiftly. An associated reason is that we are used to the shape of letters and words, primarily by seeing the top half, as we quickly distinguish between low letters (a, c, e, g, i, j, m, n, o, p, q, r, s, u, v, w, x, y, z) and high letters (b, d, f, h, k, l, t). It seems to allow the eye to make an instant recognition of a word rather than a more laborious process of visually tracing each letter and putting them together to form a word.
For example,
ALL CAPS
Sentence case
@padraicpaul91, you may want to take the challenge and see which of the above examples you find easier to read (and more, to comprehend). Obviously I am approaching this with my own reading and comprehension in mind, and I'm a natural speed reader... I race through b) without hesitation or pause, but have to go "block by block" with the all-caps example in a). It's also harder in a) to carry the sense of the first two sentences through to the third (complex) sentence, so that the paragraph as a whole is more difficult to absorb than if I read b) (the sentence case paragraph).
There's also an interesting phenomenon in how easily we can recognise words even if the bottom half is removed, whereas we would have quite a lot of difficulty in recognising the same words with the top half removed. This appears to lend weight to the contention that part of fluent reading comes from our ready recognition of the shape of the top half of words, which again lends weight to the low letters/high letters idea.
on 09-07-2019 08:06 PM
on 10-07-2019 09:08 AM
Thanks, Countessalmirena.
I had not thought of the differences in the way the board works on various devices.
It's interesting to look at your sentences where one half has been removed. When teaching writing, we (or at least I) used to tell children that almost all letters need to start at the top. Most of what I would call the important parts of the letter formation are also along the top.
I had prep classes for quite a few years and I was given a bit of grief at one stage for teaching handwriting. I was told that children should be allowed to develop their own style, which I think is fine-after they learn the basics. And I am genuinely up in arms about the current notion fizzing through the school system that children do not need to learn handwriting at all now, because the digital age is upon us and 'it isn't a skill they will need'.
I think that is premature. We are not at that stage yet.
One other interesting fact I found out about letter recognition is that children cannot really start to read independently till they can recognise about 15 letters of the alphabet. After that though, they can fly. They don't need all the letters. Our powers of prediction can leap the gaps.