on 25-05-2020 11:55 AM
It used to be 3 months a ways back in the 2000s. Over the last few years I have had some difficult-to-deal-with sellers, and to get a problem reciified it has taken a long time. At least three have taken a very very long time. Two of them took longer than two months to resolve.
Now we have this viirus problem, some postal services have slowed down. A non eBay transaction had to be cancelled and me refunded. It was from the UK. Then last week, 3 days off of 2 months, the item arrived. I have informed seller and will refund later this week.
So, in light of what is going on, I think eBay should change it back to 3 months instead of the current 2 months to leave feedback. What are your thoughts?
19-06-2020 02:57 PM - edited 19-06-2020 03:02 PM
@lyndal1838 wrote:
@digital*ghost wrote:I've been on eBay since 2008 and it wasn't 3 months back then, and that is over a decade ago. I tried to google for a reference time on when it was 3 months, and either my google skills suck or it was so long ago very few people remember it, because all I found was this thread and an old thread on the US forums where someone else was talking about how it was changed "many years ago".
Digi, I have been on ebay since July 2005 and it was already 60 days then.
I think we would be hard pressed to find anyone who would remember just when it was 90 days.
If the item arrives one day after the three months to leave feedback is up what then?
There is only solution...there should be no time limit on feedback...so that those who have a pressing need to leave feedback can also make provision in their will allowing their relatives to do so.
In addition there should be a required field that sellers must complete at time of listing...they must include their bin collection days,who the contractor is,what time they usually collect & the detination of the refuse.
on 19-06-2020 07:11 PM
@lyndal1838 wrote:I think we would be hard pressed to find anyone who would remember just when it was 90 days.
Can't help there...I do remember 90 days being the thing, but no idea when that changed. Pretty sure I've been buying on eBay since before the 2002 mentioned on my profile, but that must have been before the Au site was a thing. Maybe I joined ebay.com in '97-'98? Not sure. I remember that there wasn't a whole lot there that I could buy. So...let's say that feedback cutoff went from 90 days to 60 days maybe sometime between 2002 and 2005 it was still 90 days, and at some point in changed. Who cares...it's not all that relevant to the OP's post. It was 90 once...now it is 60. That is all.
Anyway...this thread appears to have strayed a little from the OP's original point, which was around feedback cutoff times and how it relates to extended shipping timeframes (and shipping still is very slow from some countries, and even still locally at times). Seems that the consensue on returning to 90 day feedback might be 'no'. I disagree somewhat, but think that it should be tied to expected delivery dates and/or maybe actual recorded delivery if that info available. As a seller, I think a couple of weeks from when somebody receives the item is a good enough time frame to allow feedback. As a buyer, I just want the opportunity to received the item, unpack it and try it out, before I leave positive feedback if everything is ok (add time if there's a problem so that the seller and I have breathing space to resolve it).
I think the side of the fence you favour here= probably depends on whether you largely buy or sell on eBay. I can see that it would be silly for a buyer to be able to receive an item promptly, and then hold off on feedback for 85 days and drop a neg in at the last minute. At the same time, it doesn't make much sense for somebody to receive a purchased item 10 days after feedback has cut off.
TBH, I kind of thought this was already tied up to shipping time (why not...eBay already usually has this info). Guess I need to go back and read the guides again.
19-06-2020 09:42 PM - edited 19-06-2020 09:45 PM
The last post explains about the change from 90 to 60 days.
Leave feedback after 60 daysgspadariScoutJun 4, 2012 7:25:01 PMI've received an item after 60 days and I can't see it in my "awaiting feedback" list.
How can I leave feedback on those items?
If this is not possible, I suggest the extension of time because each item I buy takes aprox. 2 months to arrive.
Thanks.
... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
It used to be 90 days. Why they changed it to 60 I'll never know.
... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
I wanted to leave positive feedback for a seller but I can't, because the auction ended 60 days ago.
I only leave feedback when I receive the items, otherwise I could end up receiving less items than ordered, or items different to what was listed.
So I think it would be a good measure to extend the feedback time when an order is shipped to a country different to the seller's home country
https://community.ebay.com/t5/Archive-My-Account/Leave-feedback-after-60-days/td-p/2924887
The timeframe for leaving feedback was shortened from 90 days to 60 in May 2008, during the wave of policy changes that also eliminated a seller's option to leave neutral or negative feedback.. Before that change, there were also "back door" ways to leave it later than 90 days if you had the listing number, but the implementation of the 60-day limit also closed the back doors.
It has certainly never been just 30 days -- that would have been completely unworkable back in the days of "snail mail" payments.
Here's the Announcement:
http://announcements.ebay.com/2008/05/a-message-from-brian-burke-upcoming-feedback-changes/
https://community.ebay.com/t5/Archive-My-Account/Leave-feedback-after-60-days/td-p/2924887
on 19-06-2020 09:54 PM
So, multiple buyers have been asking eBay to extend the time limit for various reasons (some reasonable, not denying that), for years....and eBay hasn't.
Why?
One of the first things eBay did when they introduced protections for members during this time was to more than quadruple the amount of time a buyer gets to do certain things, like return items, and yet nothing was done for FB except - in a particularly rare move for eBay - introduce protections for sellers surrounding the removal of bad feedback.
Why?
Come up with a couple of astute answers to those questions, and you'll probably start to understand what is most important to eBay.
Or not, you almost never reply to my posts, I've noticed.
on 19-06-2020 10:43 PM
@digital*ghost wrote:So, multiple buyers have been asking eBay to extend the time limit for various reasons (some reasonable, not denying that), for years....and eBay hasn't.
Why?
One of the first things eBay did when they introduced protections for members during this time was to more than quadruple the amount of time a buyer gets to do certain things, like return items, and yet nothing was done for FB except - in a particularly rare move for eBay - introduce protections for sellers surrounding the removal of bad feedback.
Why?
Come up with a couple of astute answers to those questions, and you'll probably start to understand what is most important to eBay.
Or not, you almost never reply to my posts, I've noticed.
I do reply to your posts digital ghost. Anyway, one of the trade-offs eBay did was also take away the seller's ability to leave negatives and neutrals as many sellers were revenge-negging buyers who gave them a negative. This also forced many sellers to lift their game. And obviously nonsense FB and whatever other kind of FB that was obviously unwarranted wouldn't stick. But let's not get distracted from this issue here which is the "time thing", OK!
Anyway, in answer to something previous, you don't sell international so this wouldn't concern you in that respect and if you don't buy much overseas then it hardly would.. I still buy a bit overseas but if I didn't I'd still be concerned. Why? Well there are besides myself and yourself who are going to be affected. Now the world has changed, we need to change feedback to be in line with the current and continuing situation concerning this Corona virus.Two months is simply not enough. Wasn't it you who said somewhere that you use FB as a guide to working out what kind of seller someone is?
The change as you can see by looking at the C&P of the post by bostongrammy took place in May 2008 which was 2 years before you registered. I registered in July 2002, nearly 18 years ago. I remember having few years of 90 days to leave FB. Now my local PO lady tells me that my still waiting for an item to come from the US on its 6th week is nothing unusual. She also said some people have been waiting for up to 3 months.
Like I said, "We either have feedback or we don't (I think I said that). So?
on 19-06-2020 11:08 PM
@4channel wrote:...
Now my local PO lady tells me that my still waiting for an item to come from the US on its 6th week is nothing unusual. She also said some people have been waiting for up to 3 months.
Like I said, "We either have feedback or we don't (I think I said that). So?
If leaving feedback is such a critical part of your purchase regime, perhaps limit yourself to domestic purchases until international shipping times are approaching pre-covid durations.
You're really making a mountain out of a molehill - your insistence that eBay must change this or needs to do that because of a relatively minor idiosyncrasy that affects a tiny proportion of eBay transactions (and keep in mind, leaving feedback is not mandatory) is starting to remind of another international shipping related topic you gave too much attention, to the detriment of many topics.
19-06-2020 11:32 PM - edited 19-06-2020 11:34 PM
Once in a blue moon you reply, but usually don't (I should know, lol, I'm always curious about your response but often disappointed - not that it's enough to keep me up at night, it's just something that hasn't gone unnoticed and I decided to comment on it). Also, I said I joined in 2008 (January, to be exact - this account is not my first account, it's my second, and I only buy with it) and your posts indicate it was changed in May of 2008. I didn't even know what feedback was when I joined, though, so by the time I started participating in the system it would have changed, if that's all true.
My post wasn't a distraction, I was asking you to think about what might be behind eBay's decision to choose not to extend FB timeframes in the face of well-known world-wide postal delays, particularly considering (as you have evidenced) there's been semi-consistent calls for an extension for a long time, and despite making very quick adjustments to timeframes for other things.
Why would they choose to protect sellers around feedback, over or without giving buyers more time to leave it? That is the question I am asking you to think about.
And, I do sell internationally. I also buy internationally. Just not on eBay, as a general rule.
Here's an easily dismissable anecdote for ya... I'm in a group on Facebook for sellers who sell on a different site, which is where I do sell internationally, and they have a feedback system too. Buyers can leave feedback for up to 100 days from purchase.
Every. Single. Day. in that group, there's at least one post from a seller who's received a 1-star review for items "not arriving" - some of the comments I have seen are absolutely disgusting and the protections / support being offered by the site are virtually non-existent. Quite often the buyer will receive their purchase not long after leaving their feedback. You might be reasonable, be fully aware of and willing to work around extended delays, and / or give sellers heaps of time to work on solutions to problems, but for everyone like you, there's at least one other person who's the opposite, and the damage they can do is not always negligible. You may dismiss this as irrelevant, but it's not. It's indicitave of a widespread problem that is affecting buyers & sellers no matter where they sell.
Here, instead it's been post after post of buyers accessing other options they have on eBay, leaving sellers without their goods and without the money they received for it, but at least no neut / neg that will affect their business for 12 months.
A very different kind of damage indeed, but buyers are largely insulated from it all, except for the lack of ability to comment on eBay, I s'pose.
I am watching this happen, in real time, in the context of all the ramefications to covid-19 and multiple other important events having massive, lasting impact on people and their livlihoods, and this request - no matter how well reasoned it is - just seems so darn trivial and unimportant to me.
Sorrynotsorry.
20-06-2020 03:06 AM - edited 20-06-2020 03:07 AM
@digital*ghost wrote:.
My post wasn't a distraction, I was asking you to think about what might be behind eBay's decision to choose not to extend FB timeframes in the face of well-known world-wide postal delays, particularly considering (as you have evidenced) there's been semi-consistent calls for an extension for a long time, and despite making very quick adjustments to timeframes for other things.
Why would they choose to protect sellers around feedback, over or without giving buyers more time to leave it? That is the question I am asking you to think about.
I doubt that eBay has made a decision as you put it to "choose not to extend FB timeframes in the face of well-known world-wide postal delays". I would say that it just hasn't been put up for consideration yet. Unless you have a line to a source of info that others don't have then I'd say that was the case. And like I said before, there was a trade-off. Personally I can see some folk thinking that buyers have been given the illusion that the getting rid of the sellers potential to revenge-neg and punish buyers was done to improve things. IMO, it worked better for buyers but kept them from throwing the towel in and shopping elsewhere. Many sellers would see the ability to have unfair negs removed as something to protect them. Some folks would think that it all balances out. At the end of the day it's the people who host the venue who do things for their own benefit.
@digital*ghost wrote:
I am watching this happen, in real time, in the context of all the ramefications to covid-19 and multiple other important events having massive, lasting impact on people and their livlihoods, and this request - no matter how well reasoned it is - just seems so darn trivial and unimportant to me.
Sorrynotsorry.
Nothing is trivial in the grand scheme of things. The bringing restoration of allotted time to leave feedback to three months makes sense and causes no harm. It can actually protect sellers too and I'll explain that more another time. Since being here I have seen what appears to be some very selfish attitudes towards buyers by a small core group of people who work together.. I'm not the only one who has noticed this. .The ones with this attitude sometimes seem to almost have a god complex, delusions of grandeur actually. And with some others, it seems that they just think the plebs do nothing but complain and they should be thankful for what they get. I'm not going to lump you in with those individuals as I haven't seen you carry on in the fashion they do. However I really do think your view on this issue is influenced by your being a seller. Well, if so I can understand that. But it's not right!
on 20-06-2020 09:49 AM
According to my feedback profile page, I registered on eBay on 31st May 2005.
I do remember feedback being longer than 60 days when I first joined eBay, but I don't remember the specifics of it. The main reason that I'm aware it was longer than 60 days is because of one particular purchase. I don't know the date of the purchase, as eBay helpfully refer to it only as being "More than a year ago". I'm sure that it was prior to 2008. I don't remember exactly what the item was, but I think it was a non-fiction history book for research purposes.
My feedback comment states:
As a recap, here's what we announced in January that is scheduled to launch the week of May 19th in North America (which includes eBay.com in the US, as well as eBay.ca and eBay.cafr in Canada):
@4channel wrote:
[...] You may buy a lot of new stuff and you're careful. But for others that buy collectablle things, many which are old and condition often being the deciding factor in their decision to buy, it's not always going to be smooth sailing. With collectable things, electronic or certain types of media, there can be problems.
My early purchases on eBay were primarily of collectables, antiques, o/p books, o/p CDs... things of that sort. Among my purchases were:
I made it a point to check media items as quickly as possible after they arrived. I'd play those old games on the old 486 which I still own; quite a few of the games still needed to be loaded into DOSBox in order to run. As long as I could start the game and save and load saved games, all was good.
CDs - well, I'd play them as soon as they arrived.
DVDs - load into DVD player, and watch the whole thing at least within 2 weeks of arriving as a general rule.
Antique items - examine immediately, look at marks closely, check for anomalies or signs of damage. (I only ever had 1 problem with a collectable antique item purchased on eBay; it arrived broken in two, and I could see the glue where those two parts had come apart during shipping. Every other antique item has been authentic, undamaged, gorgeous.)
I would not leave something for weeks and weeks after arrival, without checking that it was in the condition described.
However, the collectables became increasingly more difficult to find on eBay, and I now primarily purchase online antiques and collectables from other sites. (There is also the problem of authenticity. I purchase from well-established antiques shops whose reputation is important to them. Quite a few of these once upon a time sold on eBay, but gradually ceased to do so.)
For perhaps 10% of my purchases in the early days of my eBay membership, the 90-day feedback period was probably appropriate.
For 100% of my purchases nowadays on eBay, 60 days is well and truly adequate.
The current pandemic with its effect upon both domestic and international postage delivery times has undoubtedly changed the landscape... and I can understand your point in thinking that the feedback timeframe should be extended to 90 days. Your point would particularly apply to reasonable buyers, who make international purchases at this time with a reasonable understanding of the devastating effects of COVID-19 on shipping/postage services and timeframes. These buyers would hold off on giving feedback until the very last day of this suggested 90-day feedback timeframe, and their feedback (when finally made) would not include comments such as "Delivery took AGES!"
However, I am only too aware that many buyers today are not "reasonable buyers" in that sense. There are all too many buyers in the US who don't even believe that COVID-19 is a real issue. (A significant percentage of Americans say that they think it's a hoax.) Even in Australia, there are eBayers who seem not to believe that domestic postage is/should be affected by COVID-19.
Buyers are opening INR cases for refunds very readily and quickly today. (This is not from my own experience, as I don't sell. It's evident from the Sellers boards, however.) In conjunction with that, buyers are also giving feedback quickly, at the same time as (or even before) they open disputes. I know from this page that sellers can set their handling time to a maximum of 30 business days (so... 42 days), so delivery time (and also the Estimated Delivery Date shown on the transaction) could be well and truly past 60 days. This may seem like a reason to have a longer feedback timeframe... and I'd agree to an extent. (A narrow extent.) But bear in mind that ❝A buyer can report in My eBay that they didn't receive an item once the latest estimated delivery date has passed, and for 30 days after the latest estimated delivery date.❞ That means that buyers can wait to open an INR dispute, to make allowances for extended delivery delays due to COVID-19 - but the anecdotal evidence shows that they are in many cases NOT waiting to do so.
Given this demonstrated impatience from buyers who are opening disputes almost as soon as they are able to do so, and given the different seller protections on different eBay sites (where such things as EU distance selling regulations leave sellers very vulnerable to buyers who either cannot or will not accept that the pandemic is significantly affecting delivery times), I think that there'd be enough buyers punishing sellers (via both feedback and disputes) for something entirely beyond those sellers' control to make the suggestion of extended feedback timeframes an unviable one.
I believe that eBay won't consider it, even if many buyers request it.* I don't believe that most buyers even want it. I believe that the very very great majority of sellers wouldn't want it.
I also believe that eBay are very unlikely to listen to suggestions by eBay members. (See this post where I refer to the specific eBay policy where they say as much.)
That doesn't mean that you can't make a suggestion. Here's the link to do so if you're interested in putting forward your idea of extending feedback.
* eBay have already considered the implications of COVID-19 and delayed deliveries. Their response is shown in Additional support during COVID-19 for buyers and sellers on eBay, where they say:
❝Seller protections
Some postage carriers are facing operational challenges at the moment and we understand there may be cases where your handling time and the speed of your deliveries are affected. [...]
We're also protecting your late shipment rate, defect rate and item not received (INR) count in service metrics. For transactions between 1 March to 30 June 2020, we'll automatically remove:
To me, this indicates that eBay sees a very considerable risk to sellers being penalised by impatient buyers. This is unusual... and in my view it contra-indicates any possibility of extending feedback timeframes.
on 20-06-2020 11:35 AM
@4channel wrote:...
Nothing is trivial in the grand scheme of things. The bringing restoration of allotted time to leave feedback to three months makes sense and causes no harm. It can actually protect sellers too and I'll explain that more another time. Since being here I have seen what appears to be some very selfish attitudes towards buyers by a small core group of people who work together.. I'm not the only one who has noticed this. .The ones with this attitude sometimes seem to almost have a god complex, delusions of grandeur actually. And with some others, it seems that they just think the plebs do nothing but complain and they should be thankful for what they get. I'm not going to lump you in with those individuals as I haven't seen you carry on in the fashion they do. However I really do think your view on this issue is influenced by your being a seller. Well, if so I can understand that. But it's not right!
Rubrications mine.
4channel, some observations for you.