misleading deceptive listing deserve neg?

I received these set of rubber feet, it is not genuine Lenovo, but third party copy. The quality is a lot worse than the genuine. I contact the seller, so he refunded payment, but the seller has wasted my time and I still have to buy and wait for geunine set, should I leave the seller with a neg for intentional misleading buyer? Selling fake as genuine?

 

 

Message 1 of 23
Latest reply
22 REPLIES 22

Re: misleading deceptive listing deserve neg?

lyndal1838
Honored Contributor

You have been buying on ebay for long enough to know that you will probably get fakes when you buy from China..

 

In view of your previous history on the boards I am not going to get into an arguement with you.....you will do what you want anyway.

Message 2 of 23
Latest reply

Re: misleading deceptive listing deserve neg?

Only one thing to say to he-of-many-aliases...stupid is as stupid does.

 

Do all sellers online a huge favour - and spend your money in B&M stores.

Message 3 of 23
Latest reply

Re: misleading deceptive listing deserve neg?

It is entirely up to you.

 

The seller did refund your money so that part is good, but at the same time, the ad definitely says Lenovo and if it is a fake then yes, that is misleading.

 

How about a neutral, with a factual statement about what happened-that the seller refunded payment because the item was not a genuine lenovo but a copy.

 

Yep, probably avoid China if you are after quality brands, you might end up with some dodgy deals. China seems okay for cheap stuff that you know is cheap stuff though.Man Happy

Message 4 of 23
Latest reply

Re: misleading deceptive listing deserve neg?

A case of  you get what you pay for? ($.7.71 AU incl postage from HK)

 

While sellers shouldn't mislead buyers as to whether a brand name item is genuine or not, there isn't much in that listing that points to the item being genuine.

 

If they were genuine wouldn't they be packaged, with the brand name on the package? The rubber feet are just sitting on pieces of white paper by the looks of it.

 

 

Message 5 of 23
Latest reply

Re: misleading deceptive listing deserve neg?


@kuromusha1 wrote:

 

I received these set of rubber feet, it is not genuine Lenovo, but third party copy. The quality is a lot worse than the genuine. I contact the seller, so he refunded payment, but the seller has wasted my time and I still have to buy and wait for geunine set, should I leave the seller with a neg for intentional misleading buyer? Selling fake as genuine?

 

 


Oh dear, here we go again, or is it still?Smiley Sad

 

Some people should NOT be buying items from / over the internet.Smiley Surprised

Message 6 of 23
Latest reply

Re: misleading deceptive listing deserve neg?

I think its strange he did not complain about the delivery time , he must of got his parcel in quick time for once,

so mr kuromusha maybe this time as your parcel came on time give the seller a tick , and maybe due to the plane trip from asia , the feet might of being better quality , but as you know feet do swell up on plane flights,mmmmm

and 1 more question mr kuromusha ,as you are  a delivery freak ,is it true you once gave your doctor a red dot feedback score ,when your wife had a child outside your doctors estimate time on the delivery day.mmmmmm  have a nice day

 

Message 7 of 23
Latest reply

Re: misleading deceptive listing deserve neg?

if they are no good for you lenovo then maybe you could use them on your wobbly wobbly joystick!

Message 8 of 23
Latest reply

Re: misleading deceptive listing deserve neg?


@k1ooo-slr-sales wrote:

if they are no good for you lenovo then maybe you could use them on your wobbly wobbly joystick!


He'd need to take his hand off it first!!!

Message 9 of 23
Latest reply

Re: misleading deceptive listing deserve neg?

*we may be human, but we are still animals*
Message 10 of 23
Latest reply