were is coustermer service

[imaguy_392000_1]

there ar purchase pending how do i delete them i dont want them

[k1ooo-slr-sales]

---

@k1ooo-slr-sales wrote:

padi, they are not screenshots.

You should try reading the posts on a mobile.  I gave up ages ago . . . as many others probably did too!

I’ll go to my mobile and take a screenshot to show how those posts appear on my mobile.

---

@4channel 

this is an example of how badly your recent posts with new method of quoting can appear on my mobile:

[audistarelectronics]

If you have ever had an item go under auction, for say, 7 or even 10 days, only to find that the ''winning '' bidder was just playing games, and had no intention of making payment, you might share my frustration. I have had it happen several times and not once has the ''second chance'' offer being accepted by the next highest bidder. I suspect the reason for this is that ''shill bidding'' could be suspected, even though it was not. But, as it does go on, I can understand the refusal of the offers. So, people such as the OP can really inconvenience sellers with their game playing. Some potential buyers get a bit suss when they see items relisted also, I know I do. It comes down to more than just a ''little game'' to play, it is a PITA , and a waste of a sellers time, not to mention, maybe the seller was relying on the funds from a sale, only to end up with nothing because of someone who we dont need as a buyer, and who has to break the rules over and over before we see the back end of them.

[tazzieterror]

C'mon K1000, maybe it doesn't suit you, but there are others for whom that kind of formatting is perfect...

Spoiler

[padi*0409]

What a mess SLR, but then I guess one man's trash is another man's treasure............maybe.

[4channel]

---

Re: were is coustermer service

in reply to 4channel

4 hours ago

@audistarelectronics wrote:

If you have ever had an item go under auction, for say, 7 or even 10 days, only to find that the ''winning '' bidder was just playing games, and had no intention of making payment, you might share my frustration. I have had it happen several times and not once has the ''second chance'' offer being accepted by the next highest bidder. I suspect the reason for this is that ''shill bidding'' could be suspected, even though it was not. But, as it does go on, I can understand the refusal of the offers. So, people such as the OP can really inconvenience sellers with their game playing. Some potential buyers get a bit suss when they see items relisted also, I know I do. It comes down to more than just a ''little game'' to play, it is a PITA , and a waste of a sellers time, not to mention, maybe the seller was relying on the funds from a sale, only to end up with nothing because of someone who we dont need as a buyer, and who has to break the rules over and over before we see the back end of them.

---

Well, I doubt very much that the OP is playing games. Shill bidding or bidding using sock-puppets is a problem all around. I'll agree there.

[audistarelectronics]

Well, whatever you wish to call it then, but bidding or ''buying now'' when one has no intentions of completing the contract and making the payment, is some type of  event that defies description really. Certainly doesn't fit into the catagory of common sence, or decency and respect to others.

[4channel]

If people bid or buy in an auction or sale then they need to do the right thing and follow though with it. That's where I stand. It's all about responsibility.

[audistarelectronics]

I think that is what we have been on about, and good that we can come to an agreement on that one, finally.