11 quotes from Julia Gillard’s interview.

[***super_nova***]

1. On how she chose to conduct herself immediately after losing the Prime Ministership: 

Gillard thought it best to “give a gift of silence to the Labor party throughout the course of the campaign; to do absolutely nothing”.

2. On the key difference between herself and Kevin Rudd:

“I think the key difference is every day I was deputy prime minister I spent all of my time doing everything I could to have the Labor government prosper.”

3. On seeing sexist and offensive cartoons and statements about herself on social media:

She felt not sadness or hurt but, ”more like murderous rage really”.

“For my personal liberty, it’s probably a good thing that I didn’t focus on them… At the end of the day, yes, it happened to me, but it’s not, you know, about me. It’s about all of us, about women and about the kind of society we want to be for all of us.”

4. On playing the so-called ‘gender card’:

“It just amazes me that we can be having this infantile conversation about gender wars, and … you just feel like saying: ‘Well, if it was your daughter and she was putting up with sexist abuse at work, what would you advise her to do?’” Gillard said.

“Because apparently if she complains, she is playing the victim, and playing gender wars, and if she doesn’t complain, then she really is a victim.”

5. On what an average day was like in her job as Prime Minister:

Gillard would go through the papers in the morning, remaking most days to her Deputy Prime Minister Wayne Swan: “Polls are **bleep**. Papers are **bleep**. Yep, yes they are, Wayne.”

6. On what advice she would give to new Prime Minister Tony Abbott:

“It is a big step from criticising what you think is wrong to working out and implementing what you think is right. On current indications, Prime Minister Abbott is intending to take that step slowly. And for all of us, I think that might well be a good thing.”

7. On whether she would like to see Hillary Clinton run for the American Presidency in 2016:

“Wouldn’t it be fantastic to follow the first African American president, with the first woman president?”

8. On what advice she would give Tony Abbott now that’s he’s brought the women’s portfolio within his own Government department.

“Ask Tanya [Plibersek].”

9. On how she managed to stay motivated in the face of “horrible sexism”:

Gillard first responded to the question, asked by an 11-year-old girl, cautioning: ”I now need to answer [the question] not using words that are inappropriate… How old are you again?”

She continued, “In moments of some, you know, stress and pressure, for example, when I was getting myself together to go out and give my final speech as Prime Minister, I certainly did say to myself that I wouldn’t give those people the satisfaction of seeing me shed a tear – I wouldn’t do that.”

10. On whether she would encourage women to think about pursuing politics:

If she could go back and advise another woman in her own position – about to be the nation’s first female PM – Gillard said she “…would still say to her: do it. Because the benefits of what you get to do are far superior to the burdens”

11. On what it will be like for Australia’s next female Prime Minister:

“I think even people who may not remember me as a good PM, I think for whoever the next woman is, there will be a bit of a pause, breathe, whatever else this female Prime Minister does, we don’t want it to be like that for her again.”

[the_great_she_elephant]

---

@monman12 wrote:

A few men made the mistake of putting a woman without the strength and personal toughness into the PM role. Likewise it would seem so with Rudd. The sad thing is that her Poor   Me  performance has sullied  the opportunity for women in the future,  and there are sure to be plenty stronger than Gillard, and more than capable of being PM in the future.

---

So has Rudd's failure sullied the opportunity for men in the future?

A politician's shortcomings, be they real or merely perceived, may sully the opportunities for their party, but in a supposedly non-sexist society, what should any of that have to do with gender?

[monman12]

Anybody notice the demise of our last PM, or feel like giving him some equal thread space?

I think there is more than a touch of matriarchal , dare I suggest, resonant  sexism here, even  perhaps a  few cathartic posts.

[freakiness]

---

@monman12 wrote:

A few men made the mistake of putting a woman without the strength and personal toughness into the PM role. Likewise it would seem so with Rudd. The sad thing is that her Poor   Me  performance has sullied  the opportunity for women in the future,  and there are sure to be plenty stronger than Gillard, and more than capable of being PM in the future.

---

What a load of rubbish.

She had more strength than most men and women. 

As I've said before, it was not her talking about sexism. It was the people observing the blatant sexist attacks talking about it.

She did not react. She did take it in her stride. And she certainly did not sully the opportunity for any women in the future.

Do some research with an open mind!

[j*oono]

---

@monman12 wrote:

A few men made the mistake of putting a woman without the strength and personal toughness into the PM role. Likewise it would seem so with Rudd. The sad thing is that her Poor   Me  performance has sullied  the opportunity for women in the future,  and there are sure to be plenty stronger than Gillard, and more than capable of being PM in the future.

---

MM I really can't discuss sexism or misogyny with you.  I remember when my older son came home from hospital after an appendectomy one Friday morning and my younger son also arrived home from year 7 camp with gastroenteritis (most likely food poisoning) in the afternoon.  

I was panic stricken because I was worried that older son would get it when he still had stitches.

All you bothered to read was that younger son had spewed in his bedroom and you told me "You're a mother,  clean it up."    

That was your bmw rider ID

[the_great_she_elephant]

I'm still waiting for someone to explain to me why, if we live in a non-sexist society, Gillard's perceived failure should be presumed to have stuffed things up for other women.

[poddster]

And did you do what was suggesterd J?

[poddster]

Thats easy to answer.

The men who installed her in the role, her own team, wont make the same mistake again 🙂

Others might , in a few generations

[j*oono]

Exactly She_el.  Brian Burke was not the best for WA but other men have taken his place without being super dodgy.

[the_great_she_elephant]

---

@poddster wrote:

Thats easy to answer.

The men who installed her in the role, her own team, wont make the same mistake again 🙂

Others might , in a few generations

---

So you are saying tthe men who installed her presume she failed beacuse she was a woman? 

Do the men who installed Rudd presume he failed because he was a man?

[j*oono]

---

@j*oono wrote:

Exactly She_el.  Brian Burke was not the best for WA but other men have taken his place without being super dodgy.

---

That was so wrong of me to say.

Brian Burke was super dodgy.  

Julia Gillard is a brilliant woman and let's hope that many more like her are capable of filling her shoes in the future in politics.