on
12-01-2014
08:52 AM
- last edited on
12-01-2014
09:20 AM
by
pixie-six
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
THE left, be they from the ALP or the ABC, oppose free speech when it is their ideology which is under scrutiny.
That's why there was a sustained outbreak of clamorous opposition to Senator Cory Bernardi's middle-of-the-road discussion of cultural values last week.
The South Australian Senator broke two of the rules laid down by the left.
He asked why no discussion of abortion is permitted in Australia though there are anything from 70,000 to 100,000 abortions carried out in this country each year, according to evidence given in Senate estimates - and he questioned whether single-parent families are the golden standard for child rearing.
Under leftist dogma, abortion, or the more politically correct euphemism, termination, should only be discussed by women. Then, using the usual distortions of the language which have seen homosexuals insist that they be called gays and that the descriptive noun marriage be corrupted to include same sex unions, the so-called progressives say they are in favour of a pro-choice policy on abortion which means in fact that women are rarely presented with any options, in effect - no-choice.
By breaking these taboos, Senator Bernardi aroused the slumberous feminist lobby, few of whom it would seem have actually read his book, The Conservative Revolution, which was published almost a month ago and has been reviewed in numerous forums.
Senator Bernardi does not hide behind weasel words.
He is so plain spoken that most of the commentators who have attacked him have revealed their ignorance of his writings or have taken his words totally out of context.
He believes in the battle of ideas and thinks it is important for politicians to stand up for what they believe in. Indeed, he believes it's the right and responsibility of every member of the parliament to engage in the battle of ideas.
"It's absolutely critical that politicians are prepared to discuss ideas that are controversial," he told me.
"Otherwise we are stuck with a tyranny of political correctness. That's a stifling doctrine we need to rebel against in this country - that's the revolution I am calling for."
The Senator understands that abortion is an emotive topic, he understands - as most people do - that it can cause enormous stress and anguish, but he is also concerned that one in five pregnancies in this country are being terminated and believes that should be a cause for concern and debate.
He has not said we should outlaw or prohibit abortion but that was certainly the insinuation made by his critics.
His position on abortion is exactly the same as that as that held by former US president Bill Clinton - that it "should not only be safe and legal, it should be rare".
Last January, in his State of the Union address, President Barack Obama echoed president Clinton's remarks saying: "Today and every day, my administration continues our efforts to reduce unintended pregnancies, support maternal and child health, and minimise the need for abortion."
That view is also held by Prime Minister Tony Abbott, whom the members of the ALP and some commentators from the ABC have attempted to link to extreme anti-abortion views on numerous occasions when they attempt to drag his personal and private religious views into the political debate.
Senator Bernardi was also attacked by ABC breakfast presenter Beverley O'Connor for mentioning single-parent families in his book.
She framed her question: "The book really rails against non-traditional families; children within a gay relationship, children of marriage breakdowns. In 2014 now, this is a fact of life, this is not necessarily a fact that families want but it's a fact of life isn't it?"
In defence of traditional families, Senator Bernardi had written: "Why then the levels of criminality among boys and promiscuity among girls who are brought up in single-parent families, more often than not headed by a single mother?"
Had O'Connor wished to put the argument in an intelligent context, she might have noted that there was a footnote in the book which referenced a New York Time article on a Father's Day address delivered by President Obama which said: "We know the statistics - that children who grow up without a father are five times more likely to live in poverty and commit crime.
"Nine times more likely to drop out of schools and 20 times more likely to end up in prison.
"They are more likely to have behavioural problems, or run away from home, or become teenage parents themselves. And the foundation of our community is weaker because of it".
O'Connor's approach to the Bernardi book exemplifies the arrant hypocrisy taken by so many at the ABC when they are wittingly or subconsciously taking up the cudgels for the left and Labor against conservative figures.
They so obviously inject and infect their interviews and assaults with their own personal political prejudices.
While O'Connor may not like the mainstream moral compass which has served society well for millennia, she and other critics should note that on these issues, Senator Bernardi is actually in excellent company.
on 12-01-2014 12:53 PM
So you think that the "100,000" women having abortions each year are having them because some random man (they have picked up off the street) is "dumping sperm into them" so they can get some welfare?
Makes sense.
Not.
on 12-01-2014 01:33 PM
polocross58 , there is nothing in Koran about female genital mutilation, and the practice is usually performed by the women, not by men. FGM is practised as a cultural ritual by ethnic groups in 27 countries in sub-Saharan and Northeast Africa, and to a lesser extent in Asia, the Middle East and within immigrant communities elsewhere. Contrary to popular believe the procedures are not required by Islam. It is in fact, a cultural practice that transcends religious affiliation as it is practiced among Christian, Islamic, and Shamanistic communities in Africa, Asia, and the Middle East.
on 12-01-2014 01:57 PM
@polocross58 wrote:
So that should put a stop to women who get any guy from the street to impregnate them in order they can gain single-mother's welfare
Until governments get serious about stopping kids being forced into a life
abortions will continue
Right, that would stop abortions!? If a girl gets drunk, has sex with somebody she met in the pub and in the morning does not ever recall she did have a sex, and later finds out she is pregnant, and knows she will not be able to get welfare? Her only option will be an abortion. Actually, in such a cases i think abortion would be the most preferred option. The other option is totally irresponsible teenage mother trying to cope with possibly alcohol brain damaged child, without any income or support. Of-course, she could then offer the baby for adoption - I am sure that prospective adoptive parents are just queueing up for such babies, especially as it is now quite obvious that genetics play a bigger role in what we are than we previously thought.
However, that is the very wrong steroetype of "single mother". Most single mothers are NOT like that, most were in a long time relationship or marriage that breaks down, most do manage to get education (some already have that before they have baby), and good jobs. Yes, unplanned baby makes life more difficult, but women do manage. And there are many prominent Australians who were brought up by single parents: number of politician on both sides, as well as prominent people in other walks of life, here and overseas; one is the present US president. 🙂
12-01-2014 02:05 PM - edited 12-01-2014 02:05 PM
Polocross, there is one four letter word missing from all your rants that, if used, might lend them at least a faint air of credibility. that word is
S O M E
on 12-01-2014 02:07 PM
I don't believe that it was the ABC made my post just vanish.
on 12-01-2014 02:11 PM
@lakeland27 wrote:good luck with that . the best thing men can do is allow freedom of choice, one don't have to embrace abortion but simply realise they do not and should not dictate women's choices. people such as bernardi want to control others genitals, he's the freak.
he only wants to control the females genitals.
all this has little to do with the male of the species apparently .
on 12-01-2014 02:14 PM
Only SA,WA and NT actually keep a record of abortions so the accuracy of the stats quoted is questionable.
Safe abortions need to be readily available. The death rate of women caused by botched backyard abortions has been dramatically reduced since legal termination.
Abortions occur for many reasons and is a personal choice. Pregancy occurs under various different circumstances and condemning one particular group of people is myopic at best.
Education is key.
on 12-01-2014 02:37 PM
Getting back to original topic, does Amazon also not believe in the right to free speech. Were all those satirical reviews a con job perpetarted by a left leaning international company? did Amazon suppress an equal number of genuinely positive reviews? Or could it be that the published reviews actually represent the true opinions of the majority of the book's reviewers?
on 12-01-2014 06:40 PM
I would like for that Man and others who quote figures to speak and clarify the numbers of abortions he/they quotes as happening in Australia each year in his book.
Are they based on medicare figures ? Does he include spontanious abortions in his fugures ? Does he know the difference ?
and do his figures include ALL currettes...which many women have for various reasons ?
on 12-01-2014 06:51 PM
Exactly, Iza.