on 19-02-2013 06:30 PM
I guess these greedy people earning under $37,000 won't be buying Flatsceen Tv's, cigarettes and cartons of beer come tax time
As a Galaxy poll shows 62 per cent of women harbour concerns over the Opposition leader, Australia's peak welfare body and Labor are targeting Mr Abbott over the $800 million savings measure.
The Coalition plans to scrap the $500 co-contribution for workers earning less than $37,000, a move that will affect thousands of women in some of the country's most marginal seats.
In western Sydney, around 25,000 women will lose the benefit in the Labor-held seats of Lindsay and Greenway, while nearly 13,000 low-paid women in the Victorian regional seat of Corangamite, held by Labor's Darren Cheesman, will also miss out.
Brisbane, one of the Liberals' most marginal electorates, also has a high number of working women, around 15,000, who stand to lose the $500 payment.
The Gillard Government hopes that Mr Abbott's negative standing with many women will allow it to "sandbag" crucial marginal seats at the September 14 poll.
Around 60 per cent, or 2.1 million, of the 3.6 million workers hit by the Coalition super policy are women, and female workers generally hold around 50 per cent of the total super savings held by men.
on 19-02-2013 06:33 PM
The Coalition has today confirmed that they would re-impose a 15 per cent tax on Australia's lowest paid workers (earning below $37,000) including 2.1 million women.
When asked today during his appearance at the National Press Club whether he would maintain the Low Income Superannuation Contribution (LISC) Tony Abbott confirmed the Coalition would not keep this important Labor tax cut.
JOURNALIST: The Coalition's promised to scrap all expenditures relating to the mining tax, I believe. And also in your document at the weekend you said there wouldn't be substantial changes to superannuation. But there's something called the low income super contribution, which I think is funded from mining tax?
ABBOTT: Yes.
JOURNALIST: And scrapping it I think would make superannuation more expensive for people earning under $37,000 a year. So I'm just wondering if you can – does it stay or does it go? Can you just reconcile that?
ABBOTT: Well I said there'd be no unexpected detrimental changes and the change you allude to is one we've put on the record many months ago and yes, that stands.
This development constitutes a superannuation tax increase of up to $500 on every Australian worker earning below $37,000.
The Low Income Superannuation Contribution has been in place since 1 July 2012 at a cost of approximately $1 billion per annum.
The purpose of the Low Income Superannuation Contribution is to effectively refund the tax paid by low income earners on their concessional superannuation contributions, including the superannuation guarantee, up to $500 per annum. Because of their lower income tax rate, lower income earners otherwise don't get the same concessional benefit as workers on higher incomes.
Treasury analysis says the 3.6 million workers earning under $37,000 includes:
Around 1.1 million workers in NSW
Around 910,000 workers in Victoria
Around 800,000 workers in Queensland
Around 260,000 workers in South Australia
Around 360,000 workers in WA
Around 90,000 workers in Tasmania
Around 30,000 workers in the NT
Around 50,000 workers in the ACT
3.6 million people equates to 3 in every 10 workers.
Far from decreasing taxes and increasing retirement savings of Australians, the Abbott Coalition will go into the election opposing the Low Income Superannuation Contribution while also opposing Labor's policy to raise the Superannuation Guarantee from 9 to 12 per cent.
It also immediately destroys Mr Abbott's so called commitment earlier in the week to make no changes to the superannuation system. The re-imposition of a $1 billion per year tax on 3.6 million Australians is an unexpected and dramatic change by any assessment
on 19-02-2013 06:35 PM
and that's just the entree
on 19-02-2013 06:35 PM
on 19-02-2013 06:39 PM
little john killed off robin and his philosophy.
on 19-02-2013 06:39 PM
Russel Crowe?
or
Kevin Costner?
on 19-02-2013 06:43 PM
errol flynn
on 19-02-2013 06:48 PM
He might be hard to get a hand of
on 19-02-2013 07:09 PM
by the way....his name is Abbott....not abbot
on 19-02-2013 07:11 PM
as is my maiden name