Why do Alarmists, like David Suzuki and you Iza, always need to refer to oil and coal mining companies, when in a debate with
those who are more "Skeptical"......
If you watched the clip, you would see that David tried that one on........ changing the subject much..... Alarmists seem more
interested in creating conspiracy theories than answering questions.....hhmmmmmm.
on - last edited on by
pixie-six
siggie-reported-by-alarmists I see your ignorance of the Scientific Method, and understanding of data periods has not changed:
SRP: " His questioner tells him that the main climate data sets show no real warming for some 15 years.
Suzuki asks for the references, which he should have known if he knew anything of the science."
I will ask for a reference also SRP to confirm "no real warming for some 15 years" , because the systems you have mentioned produced this, also have a bonus: NOAA.
As you so rightly, and unusually, comment SRP , four of the most basic measurement systems (+1) of global temperature, but for some reason the concept of meaningful trend period is never addressed for the selected 15 years, because the observation data periods you mention are selected to prove a short term point, when global warming (or cooling) of any significance takes many decades.
Why not present 1900-1915 or 1940-1955 as portents of meaningful cooling? Whoops, they were not then, nor will the current 15 years be either..
Remember SRP (DLA), always use a significant trend period to produce a significant yearly running average.
nɥºɾ
@siggie-reported-by-alarmists wrote:Why do Alarmists, like David Suzuki and you Iza, always need to refer to oil and coal mining companies, when in a debate with
those who are more "Skeptical"......
If you watched the clip, you would see that David tried that one on........ changing the subject much..... Alarmists seem more
interested in creating conspiracy theories than answering questions.....hhmmmmmm.
__________________________________________________________________________________________
I'm posting about one of the most awe inspiring,beautiful,unique things I have ever seen in my life and something I as an Australian value and want to share with furure generations .
If that or anything else makes me a skeptic of Coal Mine Owners or an alarmist ...OK
I give a *bleep*
@monman12 wrote:DLA I see your ignorance of the Scientific Method, and understanding of data periods has not changed:
SRP: " His questioner tells him that the main climate data sets show no real warming for some 15 years.
Suzuki asks for the references, which he should have known if he knew anything of the science."
I will ask for a reference also SRP to confirm "no real warming for some 15 years" , because the systems you have mentioned produced this, also have a bonus: NOAA.
As you so rightly, and unusually, comment SRP , four of the most basic measurement systems (+1) of global temperature, but for some reason the concept of meaningful trend period is never addressed for the selected 15 years, because the observation data periods you mention are selected to prove a short term point, when global warming (or cooling) of any significance takes many decades.
Why not present 1900-1915 or 1940-1955 as portents of meaningful cooling? Whoops, they were not then, nor will the current 15 years be either..
Remember SRP (DLA), always use a significant trend period to produce a significant yearly running average.
nɥºɾ
Yes the last 15 years Monman,
Why does your graph not include the last 13 years.......... Typical Alarmist.
And you have the nerve to say - ignorance of the Scientific Method, and understanding of data periods has not changed
No Monman - yours hasn't changed.......ROFL.....
@siggie-reported-by-alarmists wrote:
@monman12 wrote:DLA I see your ignorance of the Scientific Method, and understanding of data periods has not changed:
SRP: " His questioner tells him that the main climate data sets show no real warming for some 15 years.
Suzuki asks for the references, which he should have known if he knew anything of the science."
I will ask for a reference also SRP to confirm "no real warming for some 15 years" , because the systems you have mentioned produced this, also have a bonus: NOAA.
As you so rightly, and unusually, comment SRP , four of the most basic measurement systems (+1) of global temperature, but for some reason the concept of meaningful trend period is never addressed for the selected 15 years, because the observation data periods you mention are selected to prove a short term point, when global warming (or cooling) of any significance takes many decades.
Why not present 1900-1915 or 1940-1955 as portents of meaningful cooling? Whoops, they were not then, nor will the current 15 years be either..
Remember SRP (DLA), always use a significant trend period to produce a significant yearly running average.
nɥºɾ
Yes the last 15 years Monman,
Why does your graph not include the last 13 years.......... Typical Alarmist.
And you have the nerve to say - ignorance of the Scientific Method, and understanding of data periods has not changed
No Monman - yours hasn't changed.......ROFL.....
Hows about you show us your chart ? whats stopping you ..
